I agree. Many modern feminist women are not for equality anymore. They just want to rise above men and keep men down.
For example, feminists say they should be allowed to be sluts and wear sexy clothes. But where are they defending the man's right to wear makeup and sexy clothes? Where do they defend's man's right to be a slut and have sex with as many women as he pleases? No, they praise themselves for being a slut but shame men for being sluts. In fact, some of these TERF feminists deny a man's right to have a sex change and be a beautiful woman who wears cool clothes.
I believe the true feminists of equality are the feminists who support musicians such as David Bowie and Michael Jackson, men who wore makeup, slutty men of glamour. This is the type of Feminist I would wish to marry. But where are these feminists now? I see no men on makeup anymore on stage. Where is the equality when men are no longer allowed to be beautiful? People like Marilyn Manson are not on CNN anymore, all you get is generic cis men. Feminism does not stand for equality.
I am the one who stands for Equality. I believe Women should get equal pay as man. It makes no sense, legally speaking, that they receive less pay for the same job. Women should also be equal to die on the Titanic. If there is a Titanic I demand that an equal amount of women die as the men. If there is a World War, I demand that an equal amount of female soldiers be drafted and die. If there is sexual frustration in a nation, I demand that an equal amount of women be as incel as men. I am all for equality. I believe Women should play NFL football in the same league as men, since women want to be equal to men after all. NFL is boring without women in it.
Moderns are not really for equality. For instance, if a black person fails a test, they get paid fines and fees, and have to restructure their tests so that blacks have an advantage. I am saying if a black fails at the same test a white person has to take, so be it, they shouldn't be forced to pay fines and fees because the black person happened to fail. I am saying all races should be given the same tests, it is racist to go easy on black people and make whites have a harder time of it than minority races.
I am all for equality. Anyone with an IQ less than 125 should not be allowed to vote or be a politician. This is fair standard and empirical. If a woman has a 130 IQ she should be allowed to vote. If a man has a 130 IQ he should be allowed to vote. It's that simple. It is nonsensical that a 150 IQ is forced to obey the laws rules and dogma of someone with a 100 IQ. It is nonsensical that the visionary, free thinker free spirit has to follows the laws rules and dogma of a simpleton. It is like a Great Tiger, having to obey the laws and rules of a mouse.
you raise some excellent points.
my post of
equality
was equally a critique of the nature of the thread seeming to be a whimsical patriarchal song book paying homage to the effeninisation of women above their own individual status as a human being.
... a near victimisation process undermining the nature of independance by attributing a secondary subjective analysis to frame the gender as having traites that define the way people should percieve them.
like stripping off their individuality.
and as you point out, often inside such supposed championing of the female gender discussions is an undercurrent of gender bigots who claim effeminate nature of female gender to be a state of genderbias naturalness.
gender conformity dictated by parents upon girls is still very fashionable in most cltures,
specificaly to make them physically weaker than males.
i find that quite disheartening, yet a feature of the species.
these things take time.
much soo in how i might dissagree with you with quota systems.
if there is no physical benefit of breeding physical reality created by hundreds of years of slavery of people by race or gender, then let all finnancial access be equal to the lowest minimum wage.
yet... reality is still reality. most humans kill animals to survive.
killing is a natural part of the human psychye and thus so to kill other humans.
suddenly expecting the species to jump into a state of respecting all life is unrealistic.
equally, respecting both genders equally.
the discord is that we can see the difference, we can see the vast and staggering collosis of human intellect devoid of gender and often inspite of it and in so we are privilaged.
the question is, how do we exercise that privilage ?
should we give others a helping hand ?
i say yes. many say no.
