I gotta agree with Enmos here. I don't see how anal sex could be pleasurable, it just seems equivalent to taking a dump except with a repeated in and out motion.
It feels absolutely wonderful if done right with the right person. It's very different. It's like comparing a clitoral orgasm to peeing. Vaguely related, but much, much better.
I still don't get the fact that people actually dare to compare breastfeeding with ...defecation.
a) there's no bodily waste left after breastfeeding contrarily to ..."shitting and pissing"
b) the milk that the breasts produce is actually...drinkable while sh*t and piss isn't something I'd pour down my throat..but yeah, whatever floats your boat.
c) breastfeeding can be at the most be as disgusting as when some ugly fat twat noms on some really really greasy steak and eats with an open mouth. Well, do you want to ban fat people with no manners, too? I find it obscene how some people consume their food.
d) breastfeeding doesn't reek contrarily to faeces and urine.
e) you're a sicko if you compare breastfeeding to public sex. What's with those twats who get a hard one when they see a mum feeding her baby? If someone needs to get banned then it's those sickoes.
f) if customers cause such a ruckus because a mum is breastfeeding her kid which generally takes like..20 minutes if I'm not mistaken, then I must say..what the Hell is wrong with them? You don't stare at other people. That's not well-mannered.
Etc.
Heh. You said it. I didn't. Every psycho go yell at her!!!
They may have to. What if they can't afford a wheelchair or a vehicle capable of transporting one?
What if I can't afford formula or have a preemie I have to feed on the spot? That's a strawman.
And you still are ignoring the fact that one is a voluntary behavior that resulted from a series of choices and the other is a physical injury/flaw that is almost always involuntary.
Uh, no. Lactating is not voluntary. Trust me. Ever have your titties go off because a baby's crying? Great way to end up with a sopping wet shirt. For some women, it's feed or make a mess RIGHT THEN.
That's like arguing that a business that refuses to hire someone covered with tattoos and piercings is doing the same thing as the business that refuses to hire a black person. One is voluntary and a possible consequence of behavior and life choices. The other is mistreating someone for something they can't help.
As someone who has piercings and tattoos: Bullshit. You cannot compare race or tattooing to motherhood.
Are you a disabled person who is confined to a wheelchair?
At least I've been pregnant and given birth and studying medicine and am somehow vaguely qualified to take part in the conversation rather than just blurting my thoughts based on a gross misunderstanding of private property and discrimination law. And I was married to someone who was disabled. I think I know something about this.
And saying, "That's a good argument!" shows what a good argument it is.There's a pretty valid argument that it isn't discriminatory. Prudish and lame, maybe, but not discriminatory in any sensible use of the term.
Believing that, "You aren't allowed to engage in that activity on our property." is exactly the same as, "We don't allow your race/gender/ethnicity/sexual orientation/etc. on our property." doesn't seem particularly sensible to me.[/QUOTE]
Then you're just clueless. I'm done here.