UFOs (UAPs): Explanations?

Now with the insults on my own character and intelligence. You haven't learned a thing have you? Why don't you go read the Sci Forum rules on proper netiquette that you supposedy authored?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

You get off on putting people down. It's what you do.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

And again:

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

MR, you keep equating insults with "getting off".
You can only guess at JamesR's kinks, but you know your own kinks.
You are revealing more about yourself than about anyone else.

Also, you have a dirty mind.

 

Whatever makes you feel better about yourself.

 

Inanity is what I speak of James on this thread ? ( context is High lighted ) .

Not to me though , for me my thinking is more knowledgeable and advanced . You just spout mainstream ; political correct thinking .

When one is conservative in ones thinking , as you are , your thinking becomes restricted to your own narrow view . Inanity is everywhere , but not in yourself ; not in your thinking . You put limitations on others because you have limitations of what you can conceive , imagine and understand ; and want to really .

Being conservative is where most people , like yourself are . Its a mindset . A mindset that is stagnant , and a more comfortable place in which to understand things . A comfort zone of thinking . I get it . I get where your coming from .

Have a good day James R .

river

 

And clearly you have no curiosity nor motivation to seek knowledge on the subject ; what evidence does the pro-alien have ? Should be a question that you want answered . But you refuse to do so , why who knows .

For me the evidence is clear .

There are more advanced living Beings than our selves in this Universe . Simple as that .

And I prefer Written testimony . Details .

 

Let me put it this way ; what books have you read on the subject ?

Name one or two , and if I don't have this book , I will buy it . Then we can discuss page by page .

 

Books are not evidence. And we certainly shouldn't need to read a specific book to analyze evidence.

If you have a book that references evidence you find compelling, that evidence will exist outside the book, and we can analyze it at our leisure and in our own way. That's the nature of science - it's public, not secret, and withstands multiple independent methods of analysis.

Got some evidence?

Because without it, your claim, here, is a completely unfounded opinion - formed by someone(s) who wants you to read their book(s).

 

So you haven't read just one book on the subject !

So what you get then any information from mainstream tv ? Are you kidding me . Seriously

 

Name one

No

 

Have you heard of Blue Book? Well, I read a book once, it was green. I also read a little book, I think it was red.

 

I think MR is ''defending space aliens'' based on what he believes to be true. Nothing more or less. Why all the fuss?

 

TV shows are also not evidence.

You need to get away from the idea that some specific source - such as an author of a book or a TV show - can be convincing.

Books and shows don't own facts or evidence. Those things are public.

Things that are not public - such as those only found in a book or a TV show - are not facts; they're narrative.

So all we've heard from you so far is "I believe this guy that wrote this book."

If you ever ave any evidence, we're here.