Do you as a man have a sexual need for other men

Do you as a man have a sexual need for other men

  • Yes, all the time

    Votes: 9 9.7%

  • Yes, sometimes

    Votes: 9 9.7%

  • no, never

    Votes: 67 72.0%

  • I'm not a man.

    Votes: 8 8.6%
  • Total voters
    93
Light said:
When it comes to being a source of information, Buddha is worse than useless. He claims to be a researcher but his research has actually been nothing more than an attempt to find writers who offer at least some vague support for what he wants to find.

The real truth is that he's a fraud - through and through. What he offers as information is nothing more than his own personal opinion.

He's an individual with a very serious sexual-identity crisis. I honestly suspect that when he first displayed his homosexual tendencies that he was subjected to great humiliation by his family and friends. As a result of that his wishing for a warped, twisted sexuality on the part of everyone else, he's gone to great lengths in an attempt to justify his own personal sexual preference.

If he could succeed in convincing just a few people that his warped theory is correct - that all men are homosexual by nature and have been pressured by society to be otherwise - he'd feel more comfortable with his on personal demon. He's had very little success, though, and he's frustrated to the point that he sees sexuality in practically every sort of human encounter. Regardless of the subject matter of a thread, if he gets involved in the discussion sooner or later he'll bring his obsession - sexuality - into it.

He needs professional help. Serious help. But I'm certain he would reject it because it goes against his agenda which is to convert the entire world to his sick vision of how it should (meaning as HE wants it) be.
Click to expand...
I won't comment on the rest of your complaints, you're just a big complaining mouth, who knows nothing about the subject but is obviously very perturbed by what I have been saying. I don't what it is exactly, that disconcerts you so much about the issue --- is it that you'r part of the 'vested interest group' or that you're a religious nut or a cultural one.......and frankly I hardly bother. There will always be nuts like you, and I don't want to change everyone.

But this thread, and the number of people who have been pouring out their frustration here, when hardly any of them have been able to answer to the points that I've raised or even touch the evidences that I've given to show how they are invalid or wrong --- it is all a concrete proof that I've made some mark, some dent into the heterosexual power base --- if only on this thread.

By the way, you're nothing more than a stuck up, grouchy, bastard, wimp!
 
Last edited:
I, for one, recognize that Buddha1’s thesis has had a profound influence on me and, I hope, many others, who are now questioning their sexuality and preparing the world for the future herbivorous, homosexual man living a “meaningful existence”, to come and calim his heritage.

It is undeniable that Buddha1’s well crafted and well thought out positions will have greater political and cultural effects in the years to come and that he has started a tide of change that will sweep across the globe and bring mankind back to its ass-pounding pasts.

In time we will remember him as our homo-sage, the prophet of posterior penetration, the guru of gayness, and his name …Buddha1?...will live in infamy.

The scientific community denies his greatness, afraid to give up its hold on human minds, but truth cannot be denied for long.
Already the sound of closets being opened and men shopping for glitter echo across the landscapes.
I would suspect the first sign of the homo revolution will be an increase in Butt-plug sales….*caching*!!!
 
spuriousmonkey said:
Why don't you go sick my duck.
Click to expand...

... and I'm not ashamed to say the roar of guns and cannons almost made me cry...

There was something in the air that night, the stars so bright, Fernando...

They were shining there for you and me, for liberty, Fernando...
 
spuriousmonkey said:
What risk is there in an anonymous poll?
Click to expand...

Perhaps you don't know much about straighthood (and you call yourself straight!)

The basic ethos of the straight identity --- and that is what men learn subconsciously about it --- is that --- if you can't suppress your sexual feelings for men, then you can have them, you can even indulge in them in limited ways, do whatever you want --- just never, never acknowledge that you have them, as long as you do that, you're straight.

This applies to an anonymous poll!
 
Light said:
When it comes to being a source of information, Buddha is worse than useless. He claims to be a researcher but his research has actually been nothing more than an attempt to find writers who offer at least some vague support for what he wants to find.
Click to expand...

Hey, Light! What was it you were saying about cancer and mutations? I don't quite remember what exactly it was that you said. Please refresh me!
 
Or were you going to discount me on a technicality? Is THAT why you didn't bother to respond? Or did you just have better things to do? Of COURSE! That must be it!
 
Buddha1 said:
Leopold,

Desist! If you consider yourself a friend, desist from making personal insults!
Click to expand...
it wasn't intended to be an insult buddha.
it was an honest question on my part.

it's interesting that you would consider me refering to you as a homosexual an insult.
it seems that you have just contradicted your own theory.
 
They are the only women who arent supressing their homosexuality to fit in in our hetero world. Women and men both suppress their latent homosexuality for fear of public ostrazation.

(these arent my thoughts, just paraphrasing what buddha has said elsewhere... how did i do?)
 
leopold99 said:
it wasn't intended to be an insult buddha.
it was an honest question on my part.

it's interesting that you would consider me refering to you as a homosexual an insult.
it seems that you have just contradicted your own theory.
Click to expand...
To hell with the theories!

If you can't understand what I'm saying, or the cultural difference, then the best you can do is to stick to a general discussion and stop making personal remarks. Is that too much to expecct!
 
Buddha, do you understand the difference between understanding what youre saying, and agreeing with what youre saying?
 
Buddha1 said:
To hell with the theories!

If you can't understand what I'm saying, or the cultural difference, then the best you can do is to stick to a general discussion and stop making personal remarks. Is that too much to expecct!
Click to expand...
jesus christ buddha calm down
you must remember i am a complete dumbass when it comes to this stuff

aren't you putting forth the theory that homosexuality is natural?
and if so why are you so offended by my remark?

there is no need to get your panties in a bunch
i am just trying to figure this mess out.

i meant nothing by the remark i made
it was just a feeling that i had
and i asked about it
you responded and cleared it up for me
so let's not get all stupid okay?
 
Fafnir665 said:
They are the only women who arent supressing their homosexuality to fit in in our hetero world. Women and men both suppress their latent homosexuality for fear of public ostrazation.

(these arent my thoughts, just paraphrasing what buddha has said elsewhere... how did i do?)
Click to expand...
I think this is one way to put it......is reasonably close.....it is a good way that a western mind can understand what I've been saying.

.....and this is just a small part of what I'm saying. But an important part.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top