Beaconator
Valued Senior Member
Ill take an old couch over a drug addled woman who has sex for money.
Trumplicans?
- Thread starter wegs
- Start date
RainbowSingularity
Valued Senior Member
you are forced to pay for both of them and the old wee smelling worn out couch costs 10 times the price of the sexy hot new hooker
i like how you show your bigotry by adding
thats quite funny
Beaconator
Valued Senior Member
Oh my god a bigot is someone who is intolerant of those who hold different opinions!
So if you dislike someone's opinion and say something against it your technically a bigot...
I'm going to start using this in physics.
So if you dislike someone's opinion and say something against it your technically a bigot...
I'm going to start using this in physics.
RainbowSingularity
Valued Senior Member
lol
calling someone an intellectual cripple via drug addiction "drug addled" is a new item to the context which was sexual attractiveness as a premise of popular celebrity status as a identity politics platform.
it clearly shows your attempting to change the subject for some reason and adding the Ego of "drugs"
your pitching to quite a dumb audience arnt you.
good luck with that
it will probably sell well.
should you wish to discuss defining the nature of bigotry as a premise of protective Ego paradigms to format forced group agreement.. then start a thread.
it might be quite interesting
Beaconator
Valued Senior Member
If your my audience than yes! Lol lol
You gotta admit you walked right into that one.
Maybe I misunderstood the premise of the thread.
But in my defense prostitutes are often more likely than pornstars to consume illicit narcotics and illicit narcotics often effect ones physical appearance.
As the guy said:
If you are tired of the race card, take it out of the deck.
If you are tired of the Civil War references, speak to the ones insisting on making them: the voters who make up the base of the Republican Party.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/these-5-states-still-use-confederate-symbols-their-flags https://video.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search;_ylt=AwrC3CJxFj5dnVEA_wcPxQt.;_ylu=X3oDMTByMDgyYjJiBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMyBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzYw--?p=trump rally confederate flag&fr=yhs-symantec-ext_onb&hspart=symantec&hsimp=yhs-ext_onb
If you are tired of hearing about "racist notions", quit shoving your racial bigotry into other peoples's faces. Quit using your police to beat up on black people and black communities and brwon people and brown communities and red people and red communities. Quit supporting Republican Party politicians.
Vociferous
Valued Senior Member
Literally the most insane thing I've possibly ever read. From this point on, you have zero credibility. Just an extreme leftist living in his little leftist bubble.
You apparently have no idea what the majority of Americans favor and believe. Either that, or no idea what AOC advocates and claims to favor and believe.
Or, possibly, you don't know what "moderate" means. That would fit your general misuse and abuse of common English words, which in political matters always (always = no exceptions recorded here) matches the current propaganda usage of the Republican Party's media feed.
Issue by issue, poll by poll, case by case, added up and averaged out, AOC's public stances align with the majority or plurality stances of the general American public as well as or better than any other nationally known politician's.
AOC is what the American political center of the real world looks like. All you have to do is look at it, and compare.
Why is that strange news to you - as well as, by some wild coincidence or whatever, being strange news to all who depend on the rightwing corporate media feed for their vocabulary and framing?
Vociferous
Valued Senior Member
Your whole post is projection at its finest. Everything outside of your little bubble is completely unknown and strange to you.
More insane than windmills cause cancer? That climate change is a Chinese conspiracy? That laziness is a trait in blacks? That Mexico will pay to build a US wall?
You either live a very sheltered life, or have the narrowest set of blinders ever made.
RainbowSingularity
Valued Senior Member
Retroublicans
Repulsatrumps
TrumplePubs
ReTrumplotics
Retrumplotitis
TrumpLoPoliTitiCans
Republanoids
TrumpTeaPublicanatoids
Repulsatrumps
TrumplePubs
ReTrumplotics
Retrumplotitis
TrumpLoPoliTitiCans
Republanoids
TrumpTeaPublicanatoids
RainbowSingularity
Valued Senior Member
AOC is also quite hot
which really annoys the right because they dont have anyone who is as smart or hot
thats why they are so keen to throw her under the commys are centrist buss
to try and distract everyone from their personal drama about sexual attraction and leadership personal issues(gender bias).
RainbowSingularity
Valued Senior Member
all the elegance that has not been stacked away has been smashed
the "Broken tea cup party"
RainbowSingularity
Valued Senior Member
keeping in mind your posting to someone who has quite extensive experience when it comes to drug effects and mental conditions
so i can quite easily see when & who is on medication when they are on tv.
im not about to slut shame people for being on medication
OR for their mental defects, even when i can see them quite clearly in various political leaders.
i dont need to
it doesn't serve me or the common good
your need to assert the female gender to the situation speaks volumes
Vociferous
Valued Senior Member
So you find the notion that AOC's views represent those of most Americans plausible? M'kay.
You post from the standard Republican media feed which has dominated US public political discussion since 1980. It's been the common feed to everything from the US military bases to the break room tv at work to the self service gas pump screens. Nothing is less strange, or better known. The country is drowning in it.
It's what the polls, surveys, interviews, and study assessments have universally and consistently found for more than four decades.
It's a basic fact of American political reality. You didn't notice? You can demonstrate this for yourself - list a few major political issues and the majority or plurality stances of the general public "blind" (without partisan tell or designation), take them one at a time and average the scores with importance weights, and try to find a nationally known politician in better general agreement, on average, than AOC.
Or mull stuff like this: the Republican media feed normally - routinely - names and describes proposed government policies and actions not merely deceptively but in near perfect opposition to their visible consequences. Helping the poor, specifically and disproportionately, by handing out regressive Federal income tax credits, for example. Or the universal Republican Party and Republican politician positions on controlling costs via private corporate competition in health insurance, mail delivery, and Social Security.
The most striking example might be the Presidential campaign of 2004, when a plurality of Republican voters not only agreed in general with what are now AOC's "extreme left"stances on health insurance and tax policy and corporate regulation and so forth (thereby taking positions to the left of Kerry's), but in many cases attributed those stances to W&Cheney.
(That actually startled me - that's when I gave up on the idea of appealing to "moderate" Republicans via argument and discussion of issues. It doesn't matter what any consistently Republican voter thinks ibout individual issues - they're going to vote for Reagan, W, Trump, et al, regardless, and justify however; they handle cognitive dissonance via selective attention and revolving amnesia and serial absurdity backed by threat).
But that was over a year ago, which means it has evaporated from the memories of the Rep voters and supporting punditry. N0 wonder it sounds strange to them - they don't remember any of it.
This is an interesting read about AOC.
https://thefederalist.com/2020/01/0...ocrats-split-between-socialists-and-liberals/
Nope. Try again!
Your post is a great example of why Trump counts the uneducated among his strongest supporters.
Why not?
The data, physical evidence etc, is clear - the entire professional political punditry has been sliding right and authoritarian and corporate during the media consolidation and manipulation engineered and abetted by the Reagan administration and in progress ever since.
They - the corporate media - have moved the entire Overton window firmly and unquestionably right (and authoritarian) of the general American public, and the embarrassing attempts of the formerly center/left Democratic Party leadership to chase down the moving "center" between them and the Republican corporate framing have cost them clear representation of the bulk of the American citizenry.
It took more than twenty years to convert the Democratic Party media feed and bureaucratic "leadership" to promulgation of Eisenhower Republican policies and descriptions and analysis framing (the right/authoritarian side of the Eisenhower take, no less) but the ability of American corporate leadership to adopt and maintain long term strategies when they see benefit in them is widely underestimated. (Joe Biden running as a Democrat? Seriously?)