Trump 2.0

You don’t know?
I think you don't know. Hence my question about how you define gender.

Try answering the question, rather than stalling and trying to distract. Or just admit you can't answer it.
 
You’re entitled to believe what you like.
In terms of human beings..
Male = Man
Female = Woman
A man is an adult male
A woman is an adult female
What's your process for identifying an "adult male" or an "adult female"?

You just look and trust your gut instinct, or what?
 
… the teen who truly gets it and is above-it-all--like a kid who just saw The Matrix or something.

To recycle↗ a point, because it very much applies, here:

When it is skeptics criticizing religion or ufos or conspiracy theories, it's easy enough to observe the mysterious element within the crackpottery, the presence of an unresolved secret knowledge by which the believer thinks themselves somehow smarter than everyone else. And while solipsistic contrarian esoterica is not a reliable justification of any political argument, neither is it explicitly how we end up with fascism, though such occultism is nearly an assured waypoint, perhaps a necessary station, along the way.
 
The look on Trumps face and those around him, the disgust, the physical revulsion, the sneer of cold command as they listened to that Bishop speaking the words of Jesus Christ, asking for mercy and compassion. Republicans want the Bishop deported, calling the speech a rant from a lunatic. It's as if the Bishop threw a flask of holy water upon Trump and his cronies only to see the water burst into flames.

These are very sick people who claim they are Christians but are instead demons in disguise. Pure evil.
The worst part of this: the orange felon's own post on his social media, criticising her for being a "so-called Bishop", a "radical left hard-line Trump hater", "nasty", and "not very good at her job".
Basically, nothing about the content, just insulting her.


1,458 to go.
 
The worst part of this: the orange felon's own post on his social media, criticising her for being a "so-called Bishop", a "radical left hard-line Trump hater", "nasty", and "not very good at her job".
Basically, nothing about the content, just insulting her.


1,458 to go.
Like this post?:) I couldn't resist, sorry.:)
 
Like this post?:) I couldn't resist, sorry.:)
Just reporting fact, Seattle. No insults. He is orange (per his makeup), he is a felon, and he did call her those things in his post. So my post did contain content of what he said. So, no, nothing like what he did. ;)

(Sorry, couldn't resist) :)
 
james R…

Pinball says to just keep reporting me, I presume no matter what I say. Isn’t that a tad extreme?
 
james R…

Pinball says to just keep reporting me, I presume no matter what I say. Isn’t that a tad extreme?
Apologies. What I should have said was, "report him every time he is a dick polluting the site with stupid nonsense." Which, in my defense, amounts to the same thing doesn't it?
 
Apologies. What I should have said was, "report him every time he is a dick polluting the site with stupid nonsense." Which, in my defense, amounts to the same thing doesn't it?
Funny thing is…
It was Bells that banned Jan Ardena before, not JR.
If it were not for Bells, Jan would still be here.
 
Funny thing is…
It was Bells that banned Jan Ardena before, not JR.
If it were not for Bells, Jan would still be here.
Trek has confirmed that he is not Jan Ardena because he is always totally honest and sincere about stuff.
 
Does there have to be a process?
You said you can tell a woman from a man. You must have a process for doing that.

Unless it's some kind of magic that allows you to just know.
 
Last edited:
Funny thing is…
It was Bells that banned Jan Ardena before, not JR.
If it were not for Bells, Jan would still be here.
I'm not so sure. Jan started off okay, but he gradually made a troll of himself.

Trek, of course, is a completely different person who has assured us all that he doesn't know who Jan is.

The correlations between how Trek presents and how Jan presented are quite stunning, however. It's either a coincidence, or Trek is Jan's long-lost doppelganger twin.
 
You gotta love it though, that so many Republicans who invested in the DJT crypto lost all their money. One guy on Reddit says he lost $1 million.
Oh? Has it tanked already? I was expecting it to hold up for a week or so. But if so, how funny.
 
You’re entitled to believe what you want Q.
(Q) helpfully pointed you towards a number of sources, after you asked him for specific evidence. You should be thanking him for helping you.

BTW: Everybody is entitled to believe what they want. But you only posted that as an attempt at distraction, didn't you? Or were you saying that you are entitled to have your own "alternative facts"?
 
Oh? Has it tanked already? I was expecting it to hold up for a week or so. But if so, how funny.
It is c.50% off its high, but still way up on launch price, I think. It's just another of his many grifts, and a large number of people will lose out, as with his DJT stock (currently c. 60% off it's 52-week high) but some will gain. Mostly him and his inner-circle.
To be honest, how this can be allowed under the various ethics requirements and conflicts of interest, is staggering; a President with the power to significantly influence the value of the crypto market launches his own coin just days before being sworn in???

The $Melania coin, launched at the same time, peaked at $13.05 but is now at just $2.83, not far off its all-time low. Still, the coins in circulation are worth over $400m.

Unfortunately, these coins give an already questionable industry an even worse name, and are also a massive national security risk for the USA, as they give outside players a far easier way than ever before (even easier than through his DJT stock) to "buy" his influence, without ever being identified.

Only in America, I guess. ;)
 
Woohoo! Trump has finally gotten off his gold throne/toilet to make Russia see sense over the war in Ukraine, and to end hostilities.
Remember, on the campaign trail he said that he had a "plan" - not just a "concept of a plan", but an actual "plan", one that was too top secret for him to share with everyone at the time, as to how he was going to end the war within 24 hours... well, he's now implemented that plan!!
We can therefore all relax, because the war will come to an end in 24 ... oh, wait, hang on... I'm just seeing details of the "plan"....

Oh, boy...

It's a post on Truth Social, it seems.
No, he's not just posting about his plan, but rather that his post is the plan.

To quote: (capitals his)...

"I’m not looking to hurt Russia. I love the Russian people, and always had a very good relationship with President Putin - and this despite the Radical Left’s Russia, Russia, Russia HOAX. We must never forget that Russia helped us win the Second World War, losing almost 60,000,000 lives in the process. All of that being said, I’m going to do Russia, whose Economy is failing, and President Putin, a very big FAVOR. Settle now, and STOP this ridiculous War! IT’S ONLY GOING TO GET WORSE. If we don’t make a “deal,” and soon, I have no other choice but to put high levels of Taxes, Tariffs, and Sanctions on anything being sold by Russia to the United States, and various other participating countries. Let’s get this war, which never would have started if I were President, over with! We can do it the easy way, or the hard way - and the easy way is always better. It’s time to “MAKE A DEAL.” NO MORE LIVES SHOULD BE LOST!!!"
- https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113872782548137314

So, that's it, folks.
That's the plan: a case of "Stop it! Or things will get worse for you!"

Days since Trump has not done something to which his allies shake their head in bemusement: 0
Days since Trump has not done something that makes Russia and other enemies laugh: 0


He says he will put "high levels of Taxes, Tariffs, and Sanctions on anything being sold by Russia to the US". Well, here's some context: the UK and US do roughly $150bn of trade each way. The US and EU do $600-700bn each way, roughly.
The US currently imports less than $3.0bn from Russia in 2024.

Russian GDP in 2023 was c.$2.0 trillion. So it's not as though Russia relies in any way on either the imports or the exports from the US.
Trump's threats are thus, at least financially, almost worthless. Putting 100% tariff on Russian imports would raise less than $3.0bn, while a mere 2% tariff on UK goods would raise that much. Or 0.5% tariff on EU goods. And Russia's GDP, if they don't sell those goods, would drop by c.0.15%.


So, once again, the world pretty much laughs at the US President.
 
Back
Top