Persol says:
I am extended a courtesy to you by even considering that it might work.
Did I ask you if you'd please evaluate if homeopathy works?
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
I have exhaustively answered your questions.
You cannot understand them.
Get it?
You cannot understand them because you are allopathically brainwashed.
I have answered your questions in exhaustive detail out of courtesy.
You have not been able to understand the answers.
You operate under erroneous assumptions about health, disease, therapeutics, the nature of existence and the nature of the universe.
That causes you to fail to understand what I have said.
If you were not brainwashed, everything I said would have been understood and you would not have repeatedly reasked the same questions and made the same points from the same erroneous assumptions.
I did not ask you to evalute anything; you asked me about homeopathy.
But you are clearly incapable of understanding it.
I do not care!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Get it?
Please go away.
What are the parameters of homeopathy. What is the RESULTS?
That's answered in the ORGANON.
What are the parameters of the proposed study?
I will not offer to explain this again.
One more distractive bit of subtefuge and the offer is withdrawn.
you have yet to provide a good reason about why asking your patients to keep records is a bad idea, other then that you feel it might make you look stupid. What is more important, informing other people of the miracles of homepathy with a good study (and thus saving their lives) or trying not to make yourself look stupid?
I did not say it would make me look stupid; I said it would BE stupid to ask them when they feel sick, for they come to me when that happens.
I do not have to inform people about the miracles of homeopathy; my patients tell everyone and then send them to me.
I do not want more patients.
I want to explain homeopathic pharmacology, for that will force allopaths to admit to all of our clinical history.
What you want is assinine, because it cannot be done.
You also have yet to show any information about why homeopathy is better... just claims that it is, mostly from ORGANON, which might possibly be biased
I did not ask for your approval, did I?
So no, I'm not going to let you get back to your original question, because there is a question that should come before that. Does it work? Accussing us of being murderous braindead quacks does not answer the question.
You are admitting to trying to distract me and keep me from resolving a major mystery that would force allopathic acceptance of our clinical histories of millions of cases?
Why do you want to keep homeopathy from public acceptance?
It is not your place to hinder such efforts.
Tell us why you want to hinder the public from finding out about the means of cure.
Now that you have finally admitted to your devious intent, tell us exactly why you do not want cures to be had by the public.
Allopathy would disappear, right?
You would be out of a job, right?
The pharmaceutical companies would stop extorting trillions of taxpayer dollars, right?
Insurance companies would stop extorting trillions of taxpayer dollars, right?
The allopathic medical societies would be exposed for quacks, right?
Why do you not want humanity to proceed beyond a system of medicine that cannot cure to one that has shown cures since its inception?
Tell us your true motivations, for your sophistries have rung of such devious motives from the beginning.
You are distracting me intentionally, why?
I did not ask your permission.
Why are you intentionally keeping me from trying to find help to resolve a mystery that would lead to that eventuality?
Tell them.
