Originally posted by Persol
Ask your patients to keep track of days they feel sick. Also, keep track of when they die.
Compare this to people who use standard medicine using statistical analysis.
P.S. - Generally the quack is the one who can not explain his position.
Test protocols, sir.
I am not going to ask my patients to do something stupid; I do not know when all of my patients die because they often leave for parts unknown, as I already said; their deaths are invariably in allopathic hands anyway; and I do not take part in allopathic trials, as I also already said.
I also refuse to acquiesce to the notion that qualtitative evaluations are more important than qualitative ones in medicine, which measurements of longevity argue.
Allopathic medicine has a mania about quantitative measurements and thus cannot even begin to make qualtative evaluations.
Their total denial of the importance of uncommon symptoms, which avail us to make curative prescriptions or remedy diagnoses, while they're fixated upon mere common symptoms in order to make disease diagnoses and still CANNOT CURE after 2700 years of mass murder absolutely infuriates me!
They have made medicine a statistical game while patients suffer; this is NOT a game!
Our backward and warped societies more than prove that quality of life and clarity of thought are far more important the mere longevity, for the entire history of Western Civilization until recently was patriarchal in attitude and Apollonian in worldview with a near total disregard for matriarchal values and a Dionysian worldview.
We thus engendered whole generations of men of war and still basically do, with allopathic medicine in its Rationalist spectrum is a personification of these values and perspectives in quasi-militaristic views of health, disease and therapeutics.
We as a group of societies have thankfully come full circle to balance between these basic polarities, but medicine is still dominated by a totally militaristic, materialistic, reductionistic, archaic approach from the Dark Ages that thus tortures patients at every turn and finally ends their lives in euthenasia so often that it is one of the greatest disgraces of our age that we still permit these allopathic barbarians any influence in our lives.
We thus have senile dementia in President Reagan and many elderly, and nobody sees anything wrong with it.
We have kidney dialysis, which has to be one of the worst tortures at the end of life for diabetics, and nobody sees anything wrong with it.
We crack open chests and replace little veins rather than preventing these cardiovascular accidents, and nobody sees anything wrong with it.
Cancer patients are tortured and maimed in the name of medical science and longevity without curing them!
And do not tell me they cure cancer; that's a lie!
We have untold numbers of incurable autoimmune and chronic diseases in general that we can diagnose effectively but CANNOT CURE, and nobody sees anything wrong with this calculus.
In fact, the whole allopathic mania about disease diagnosis revolves around their obsession with the proximate cause but manifests in their ability to make fine quantitative measurements at the total disregard of qualitative evaluations that would permit them to cure if they would just think.
I therefore will not cater to nor tacitly approve of this mass insanity and its therapeutic horrors of self-destruction and societal ruin, and not for one second!
So arguments about increased longevity as measurements of clinical effectiveness are views of insanely ignorant people destined for premature iatrogenic deaths I will not reinforce.
----------
State the parameters you feel would work in a test and I will explain to you why they wouldn't work.
You haven't been listening to me, so I see this as the only way.
Generally, per definition, the quack is the one who cannot cure.
Allopaths openly state near total therapeutic incompetence and are therefore quacks.
I don't know where you got your dictionary or knowledge of medicine, but both are totally broken.