Syzygys said:
Sincere apology can only come from somebody who comited a crime and now regrets it. Since nobody alive here commited having slaves, there is nothing to regret about.
Sorry, Syz, but this is the day I go off on this point: "Since nobody alive here committed having slaves ...." Now, just hang on.
Tiassa said:
Getting over it and moving on only requires that people do the right thing. If nobody does the right thing, should we really be upset at blacks for not getting over it?
Now then, tell me honestly that
none of the profits of slave labor exist in the economy today. None of the families that ever became wealthy by slaves are still wealthy. Oh, wait ... that's not true? Well then, Syzygys, there are still people committing and profiting from the crime. Nobody's committing having slaves? That's just freakin' sick. Seriously, I would love to have that defense in court. I could send someone out to steal something valuable. I could have them bring me that something valuable. I could then defend my possession of it in court by pointing out that I never stole it.
Whole thing's over. My ill-gotten gain should, by that theory, remain mine. And I should never have to apologize or feel badly about the loss I inflicted on another because "I never committed the crime of stealing this thing".
Syzygys said:
Also you can only ask for apology if you were wronged. If your great-grand daddy was wronged, an apology NOW won't help him and you would be not sincere to accept it anyway...
If the wrong ended with great-granddaddy, sure, you'd have a point. However, the idea that you could even pretend to suggest that the effects of slavery are not still on us is so ridiculously mean-spirited that I realize there's very little chance of communicating the point.
The whole idea that the effects of slavery are gone is ridiculous. Indeed, history textbooks still malign the slaves, and repeat the Myth of Southern Reconstruction as fact despite its contradiction of the original historical record.
If a group is oppressed, and then that oppression breaks, a curious thing generally happens: the oppression finds a new way. The black man is dirty, ill-mannered, unwilling to help himself; not only does this myth fly in the face of history, but it blames the blacks for a condition they did not put themselves in. Show me one group of people so oppressed who recovered in a mere forty years in the face of such steep opposition that allowing them to take part in society somehow equaled oppression of the oppressors. We're about forty years out from civil rights, and white people still resist equality. The process that began with slavery still carries on today. And those who still profit from the imbalance owe much toward its solution; an apology is about the least one might ask.
If you stand around in a group of people watching white men beat up a black man for the crime of being black, sure, you haven't committed the crime of beating him. But blaming the black man for failing to overcome multiple, simultaneous assaults is just wrong. After all, if black men beat a white man, it's never the white man's fault that he didn't win the fight.
Treating people equally and fairly isn't so hard to do. Swallowing illegitmate pride, however, is an accomplishment far more demanding and bitter to the palate.