I am working my way through the thread and all I see from you are vague generalisations of topic areas that you assert are misunderstood by science. I see no clear, precise statements of what is incorrect in these areas. If I may use an analogy. Here are two comments about a hypothetical education system: 1. Our education system is worthless. We are not teaching our children the fundamentals. 2. It is stipulated that our education system will teach children in the fundamentals of mathematics, English language and basic science. It fails in two distinct ways: there is no requirement for history, foreign languages, art, physical education or geography. Secondly, periodic testing carried out by the government has shown that fewer than 74% of fifteen year old's are reaching the required minimum standard in the fundamentals. Your posts that I have read so far are analagous to the first example. What is required is something closer to the second. Will you provide it?