Metakron, you wouldn't know a valid scientific opinion if it bit you in the ass.
Don't worry, there is no risk of that happening here.
Metakron, you wouldn't know a valid scientific opinion if it bit you in the ass.
Yes. Unfortunately many people don't have that much sense. One of the things we want to do here is expose them to discussions that will help them become more sensible. If we drive them away with N-word jokes, we'll never have the chance to do that. Life is full of compromises.
I've thought about an example where a joke can have the same punchline but one can be humurous the other malicious I could only come up with one..
Some racial jokes bend, others break. It's not easy to explain why, and sometimes you can't even figure out why.
But when somebody stumbles in here from a Google search, looking for science and scholarship, and instead he finds an N-word joke, we're going to lose him.
I don't want to lose him. Building up SciForums as a place of science and scholarship is more important to me--and I think it's more important to SciForums--than trying to fight a very controversial battle over free speech.
yeah, I grew up hearing polack jokes. I've heard dumb blonde jokes. I've heard black jokes. I've heard jew jokes. I've heard dead baby jokes. But I have walked away from any person who ever told a nigger joke or a sand nigger joke.
There's a difference. It may be a fine line, but its not one I'm willing to step over.
To do so would require considerable effort on the part of the Moderators and we're all unpaid volunteers. We don't even all agree on the subject. One of us started a thread with "fuck" in the title.Can you not ban any offensive thread titles(incl' expletives, slur of gender/race etc) and have any potentialy offensive only allowed with a minium of 3 letters changed for symbols I.E. 'U suck my chods u f~#^ing moron' and (so no loop holes) the word cannot appear similar I.E. 'U suck my chods u fu#k*!g' would be blatant then the "N" word could be used as N*#ge! with no slim/to no chance of problems with search engines yet allow free speach in all topics without fear of distorted outward scrutiny by people accidently stumbling
Surely you understand that words express connotations as well as denotations. "Elegant" and "majestic" are in fact nearly identical in both dimensions; I, the Head Linguist around here, had to look them up in a dictionary to find even the slightest difference between them in a modern American context.How is there a difference? Because a different word is used? So if I say the elegant gown, it's different than saying the majestic gown? Does using pronouns change the thought that you're expressing? I can't understand how saying nigger instead of black person in a joke that was insulting nonetheless and was supposed to be makes any difference. Please explain
I'm sure if I looked I'd find some anti-Arab or anti-Semitic jokes anyway that's why it's called "the most offensive jokes".
As Q would tell you, it's perfectly acceptable and you should just ignore it![]()
As Q would tell you, it's perfectly acceptable and you should just ignore it
As Q would tell you, it's perfectly acceptable and you should just ignore it
That was only with respect to Muslims, who are delusional liars, violent barbarians and such other subhuman species.
Again, to demonstrate your intellectual dishonesty, you ignore the many times I've stated that religion is one thing and humans are another. I understand that you are unable to distinguish between them, but that does not preclude their distinctive differences.
The fact that Islam demands humans be delusional liars and violent barbarians does not make them any more less a human, it merely means they've been indoctrinated and brainwashed.
S.A.M. said:
Or is being a filth-ridden, maggot-infested liar to be considered an acceptable state of discourse?