citations [requested for my remark that SciForums is trying to attract children who are looking for scholarship, science, and maybe help with their homework]
We have given this a great deal of thought. Last year Plazma ruled that we will not allow screen names with embedded profanity. The reasoning was:
Hi Sweetie, how are you doing with your geometry homework?
Just great, Mom. I found this wonderful website called SciForums where all these really smart people answer questions.
Oh that's cool! Let me see.
Okay. Yeah, here's one by my favorite new buddy. He's a graduate student in mathematics at M.I.T. and is name MotherFucker.
This statement reeks with racism. Or is racism to white people ok in your book.
It hardly matters whether we think it's okay, does it? It seems that every African-American comedian devotes a certain portion of his schtick to jokes about Euro-Americans. One memorable one was when Michael Flatley's "Lord of the Dance" was on tour. The joke was, "You ever notice how when white people dance, their bodies don't move from the waist up?"
I remember when the movie "White Men Can't Jump" came out. Euro-Americans were quietly whispering to each other, "What do you think would happen if one of us made a movie and called it 'Black Men Can't Read'?"
When do offensive "jokes" become unacceptable?
Comedians have a well-known rule: "If it bends, it's comedy. If it breaks, it's not." It's not just about subject matter, or language. The social environment counts, as well as sheer time. I remember it was two weeks after Steve Irwin's death before any comic had the balls to make a joke about it.
That night a crocodile walked into a crocodile bar and a strange mood had gripped the place. He asked what was going on and one crocodile told him, "I guess you haven't heard yet, Bob. Steve Irwin was killed today."
"My god, that's fabulous news," Bob said. "Who got him? Was it Frankie, Sarah, Joe... who was it?"
"You'd better sit down, Bob. You're not going to believe this."
Now two weeks later that was funny. But I don't think we would have laughed at it a week earlier.
Some racial jokes bend, others break. It's not easy to explain why, and sometimes you can't even figure out why. There's no denying that of all the ethnic minorities in America, the African-American group is different in quite a few ways. They're Americans, they speak English, and on the average their families have been in this country longer than ours, yet the intermarriage rate is lower than any other ethnic community, even the notoriously conservative Japanese-Americans. Buried somewhere in that difference is the reason that jokes about Euro-, Asian-, Mexican-, Jewish- and even Arab-Americans
bend while jokes containing the N-word
break when told by anyone except African-Americans.
When do offensive jokes become unacceptable on sciforums?
Now that's a slightly different question. Scholarship is our duty and scholarship has no taboos. We study language, we study humor, we study politics and race relations, so it's our right and our duty to
discuss offensive jokes if somebody presents evidence supporting the hypothesis that there is a need to do so.
If there is no need, however, then what's the reason for posting them? It can only be to make people laugh.
I will present my own opinion, as a Moderator and as an elder of this virtual community, but it is just about the narrow topic of jokes using the N-word: it's going to
break more often than it
bends. More than perhaps any other controversial post we could allow--more than outrageous profanity, more than hateful remarks about religions, more than offensive jokes about any other ethnic group--offensive jokes about African-Americans are going to piss people off.
Now we can piss off our members because they're "family" and they can complain, as they are doing right here. But when somebody stumbles in here from a Google search, looking for science and scholarship, and instead he finds an N-word joke, we're going to lose him.
I don't want to lose him. Building up SciForums as a place of science and scholarship is more important to me--and I think it's more important to SciForums--than trying to fight a very controversial battle over free speech.
Everyone has to choose his battles carefully. I don't think we have the resources to choose this battle.
We have voted on racism before, let's vote on "jokes" that talk in terms of "niggers"
I don't think we have to. It's racism. We can waive the rules when we want to, because we're the Moderators and this isn't a democracy so we can do anything we damn well please. But we don't have to explain ourselves or apologize when we ENFORCE the rules.