My theory 1 step at a time

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by Pincho Paxton, Dec 10, 2011.

  1. Pincho Paxton Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,387
    After my snowflake test, I made a bigger test, moving more particles around. It isn't a perfect test, it has lots of the physics missing from it, I didn't add negative mass for example, but I was again surprised that I got something. In one of my tests I got a green ball spinning around a red ball in an orbit without any orbit code. But I posted this example ....

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggRxyHjimxM


    So be patient for the real thing... Teaser...
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESRffa2Se-g&feature=player_embedded
     
    Last edited: Dec 22, 2011
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    32,499
    A simulation is supposed to model the real world in some way. Your videos do no such thing.

    Post ONE piece of your analysis of something so we can take a look.

    Interesting. This is a field I know quite a lot about. Please outline your work with Bose Einstein condensates for me.

    Only got 19 lines of code, and looking for that last one to complete the picture?

    What is it supposed to simulate? If it's supposed to simulate the universe, it should produce the universe. Right?

    Do you own a supercomputer?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. origin In a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,812
    OK, then maybe I am wrong, I didn't realize you were that far along. I have seen computer simulation of 2 movng masses interacting in space only influenced by there own gravity. Even this limited case results in a tremendous number of lines of code. But that is the easy part, for the simulation to be more than a video game there has to be a set of equations that govern the different aspect of the energy and mass interactions.

    Could you write out couple of your equations from the large number of equations that must be necessary to govern all of the different interactions in your simulation?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,879
    Unfortunately for you "analysis" is NOT a posh word for "talking out of your arse".
     
  8. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    Leave Pincho alone. I want to see if he comes up with Tachyons.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  9. AlphaNumeric Fully ionized Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,699
    How do you include all the experiments etc if, by your own admission you haven't read any physics. Most experimental write ups in papers require an undergrad physics capability at least.

    You cannot simultaneously say you have included this and that while saying you deliberately didn't learn this or that.

    As yet you have failed to show any of your simulations have anything to do with reality. Thinking about things in your head isn't enough. Scientists think about their work but you disagree with them so obviously it isn't error proof.

    I do wonder if you are just a long term troll. Your claims are so exaggerated and so utterly without justification that you either are a troll or you have something wrong with you. No rational person would make the claims you have and believe in them on absolutely nothing. Or maybe i expect too much from humanity and its not unheard of for average Joe on the street to have such ridiculously flawed and delusional beliefs. That would explain religion...
     
  10. Pincho Paxton Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,387
    All I use are the particle membranes which break the zero rule, and that's all. So the equation is 1 + -1 = 0. 1 is the membrane. So when a zero particle touches a zero particle the zero rule is broken. The universe resets back to zero by scaling the particles down so that they don't touch, but the scale now creates a new set of physics, that the particles can fit inside another particle, so then the universe corrects this back to zero, and yet another new set of physics happens. The particles start to bunch into units that create zero, and you get the kissing problem. This then tries to reset back to zero, and you get spin. The spin creates a spin scale cog, and this creates Gravity, and Magnetism. So just by checking the membranes you get all the physics you need.
     
  11. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    Word salad.
     
  12. Pincho Paxton Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,387
    Better than maths salad.
     
  13. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    Worm salad is even worse!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  14. hansda Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,424
    I would like to ask , Is there any theory ; which can be considered as " theory of everything " ?
     
    Last edited: Dec 24, 2011
  15. Pincho Paxton Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,387
    The universe is everything, so copy it. Really it's getting something complex from as little as possible. It's like 'The Game Of Life' but infinitely better.
     
    Last edited: Dec 24, 2011
  16. hansda Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,424

    or , Everything is part of the Universe .


    How to copy it ? ... or... You mean to say " code it " . I think , it is more important to comprehend it .


    Newton's Laws , Einstein's theories only simplified certain complexities of our Universe . I think further simplification is necessary .
     
  17. Pincho Paxton Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,387
    Well if you saw that my snowflake program was not specifically written to build a snowflake, then take a look at snowflake code, which is specifically written to create a snowflake. You would see that the mathematical version is far more complex. Complex things are often a misinterpretation of a simple thing. I ignore Newton, I ignore Einstein, I build the universe the same as the snowflake. You just allow particles to travel to the area of least resistance. That's all. I would be willing to argue my case against every major genius in history, like a game of University Challenge, and I would still win. I would win against 6 billion people.. I'm a bit clever.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Last edited: Dec 25, 2011
  18. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    So only 1 billion more people are cleverer than you. Is that what you are saying? For at the last count there was 7 billion on Earth.
     
  19. Pincho Paxton Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,387
    Oh OK 7 billion, and all of the people who have died as well.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    It feels like I am facing them anyway.
     
  20. hansda Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,424
    You can claim anything . Unless you get acceptance of your claims ; they have no meaning .
     
  21. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    Christmas Day => Pincho Snowflake Day

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  22. Pincho Paxton Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,387
    They have the same meaning whether they are accepted, or not. I build the universe.. it a universe... I built it.
     
  23. hansda Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,424
    Merry Christmas .
     

Share This Page