Luminiferous Aether Exists!

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience Archive' started by Mazulu, Jun 19, 2012.

  1. OnlyMe Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,914
    This to me, this seems to be misguided nonsense. You don't seem to have a good grasp on what we do know about gravitation. I don't know of anyone who has assumed that dark matter and ordinary matter are "anchored" to one another as you imply. We see situations of gravitational lensing and galactic rotations that suggest, dark matter exists both in close inertial relationships with ordinary visible matter and to some extent as separate from any apparent inertial relationship with nearby ordinary visible matter.., galaxies and galactic clusters as the case may be.

    Following is just a bit of my own musings on what little I have seen in the observational literature. No one really knows at present what exactly dark matter is.

    Gravity is generally a weakly defined interaction (I hesitate to refer to it as a force), between objects of mass in space/spacetime. Gravity represents a strong interaction only in a strong gravitational field.., IE near gravitational centers of mass associated with objects like neutron stars, black holes and very close to large compact stars. It is not does not represent a strong force, relative to galaxies, except perhaps near a galactic core.., where we have evedence of the existence of SM black holes.

    Since dark matter, unlike all of the visible matter we know of, interacts only gravitationally and not electromagnetically, the largest part of dark matter associated with any stable galaxy or galactic cluster, should be only weakly "anchored", to use your phrasing, to the associated visible and electromagnetically interacting visible matter.

    Once this is taken into account any dramatic dynamic event, as in the collisions of galaxies and/or galactic clusters, should naturally evolve in a manner where the dark matter and "ordinary" visible matter are affected differently by the collision. This leading to the separations of detectable gravitational lensing we are currently observing.

    Exactly why this is the case is yet to be determined, thus the name dark matter prevails, as an unknown place holder.

    It does seem that aside from interacting only gravitationally, dark matter may also have dissimilar inertial characteristics, when compared to the visible ordinary matter we are familiar with. Once again suggesting the potential for differing dynamics in the case of dramatic dynamic collision events.
    __________________________

    The rest of your ideas, seem to move off to the extremes of any rational application of what little we know, with certainty, about space, gravitation, dark matter and perhaps reality in general.
     
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2012
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. gravitational_aether Banned Banned

    Messages:
    356
    So, I take it not only did you fail to read the article you failed to read what was quoted from the article in the post. In the quote it says the evidence of 'dark matter' not anchored to matter can not be explained by the current mainstream theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.

    The reason why the name 'dark matter' prevails is because mainstream physics is in denial of understanding aether has mass.

    'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image'
    http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

    "This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""

    The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

    There is nothing to 'leave behind'. Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Aqueous Id flat Earth skeptic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,152
    Hi, origin: yep, that's a tough nut for g_a to crack, but one that we'd expect to see honestly treated in a legitimate scientific proposal. I'm waiting for him to set the bar for what kinds of tests his beliefs can withstand. He just won't go there. Of course he simply has no idea.

    Your point is well taken--lacking falsifiability, it's not classified as science at all, not by science professionals, and not even by the courts, which share a vital basic skill with scientists, mathematicians, philosophers and so forth: logic--a process that a_g is replacing with proclamations of personal belief.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Aqueous Id flat Earth skeptic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,152
    Name that fallacy. If you recall, that was your hypothesis, not mine. As far as I'm concerned, it's moot. For one thing, the only people who have authoritatively characterized that kind of phenomenon are "mainstream", a group you've repudiated. As a corollary, you would have to shed this question, since the underlying facts you think you've gleaned about it were reported to you by people you've painted as
    But your attempted to twist my remarks is noted. The issue that you're skirting is that you can't specify the mass, volume, displacement, velocity, temperature, (conductivity, specific heat, etc.) of aether, and the reason you can't is that it doesn't have any such properties. It has no properties whatsoever, because it doesn't exist. There's a glaring hole that's bigger than the one left by colliding galactic clusters.

    Notice, this has nothing to do with aether.

    So you're saying, "anywhere science is inconclusive about a finding, aether can be used to explain it."

    If you have no working knowledge of freshman science, I suppose it is.

    If that were true you could specify the displacement in meters and/or the rate of displacement in meters per second.
     
  8. Aqueous Id flat Earth skeptic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,152
    It wouldn't even be the last topic to consider because aether was bumped from the list of plausible models over 100 yrs ago.
     
  9. Aqueous Id flat Earth skeptic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,152
    You are arguing with a Spaniard about the meaning of adios. Dark matter is a concept born in the mainstream. If the mainstream is ignorant, then you have to distance yourself from every fact originating in the mainstream. You can't have it both ways. You can't, on one hand, denounce experts, and then, on the other, rely on their work as a source of facts that supposedly shore up your beliefs. That's absurdity to the max.
     
  10. Aqueous Id flat Earth skeptic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,152
    All you have to do to settle this is to state its mass in kg. You can't because it's a spurious claim.
     
  11. gravitational_aether Banned Banned

    Messages:
    356
    I went there. Read my response.
     
  12. gravitational_aether Banned Banned

    Messages:
    356
    So, you can't explain why the 'dark matter' is being left behind when galaxy clusters collide.

    'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image'
    http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

    "This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""

    The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

    There is nothing to 'leave behind'. Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.
     
  13. gravitational_aether Banned Banned

    Messages:
    356
    Aether Displacement

    Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is displaced by matter. Displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter.

    Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.

    A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels a well defined trajectory which takes it through one slit while the associated wave in the aether passes through both.

    'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'
    http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html

    "According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable"

    "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... disregarding the causes which condition its state."

    The state of the aether at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether.

    'The Third Book of Opticks (1718) by Isaac Newton'
    http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/NATP00051

    "Qu. 21. Is not this Medium much rarer within the dense Bodies of the Sun, Stars, Planets and Comets, than in the empty celestial Spaces between them? And in passing from them to great distances, doth it not grow denser and denser perpetually, and thereby cause the gravity of those great Bodies towards one another, and of their parts towards the Bodies; every Body endeavouring to go from the denser parts of the Medium towards the rarer? ..."

    Newton is referring to the state of displacement of the aether. The aether does not have a variable density. However, Newton was correct; displaced aether is the cause of gravity.

    'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
    http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/dec/HQ_11-402_AGU_Voyager.html

    "Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it."

    It is not the particles of matter which exist in quantities less than in any vacuum artifically created on Earth which are pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

    It is the aether, which the particles of matter exist in, which is the interstellar medium. It is the aether which is displaced by the matter the solar system consists of which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

    'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory - Louis de BROGLIE'
    http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

    “When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics I was looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the physical reality of waves and particles.”

    “any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous “energetic contact” with a hidden medium”

    The hidden medium of de Broglie wave mechanics is the aether. The “energetic contact” is the state of displacement of the aether.

    A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave.

    In a double slit experiment the particle travels a well defined path which takes it through one slit. The associated wave in the aether passes through both. As the aether wave exits the slits it creates wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave piloting the particle of pilot-wave theory. Detecting the particle strongly exiting a single slit turns the associated aether wave into chop. The aether waves exiting the slits interact with the detectors and become many short waves with irregular motion. The waves are disorganized. There is no wave interference. The particle pitches and rolls through the chop. The particle gets knocked around by the chop and it no longer creates an interference pattern.

    'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image'
    http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

    "This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""

    The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

    Non-baryonic dark matter and galaxies are not anchored together. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

    'Surprise! IBEX Finds No Bow ‘Shock’ Outside our Solar System'
    http://www.universetoday.com/95094/surprise-ibex-finds-no-bow-shock-outside-our-solar-system/

    '“While bow shocks certainly exist ahead of many other stars, we’re finding that our Sun’s interaction doesn’t reach the critical threshold to form a shock,” said Dr. David McComas, principal investigator of the IBEX mission, “so a wave is a more accurate depiction of what’s happening ahead of our heliosphere — much like the wave made by the bow of a boat as it glides through the water.”'

    The wave ahead of our heliosphere is an aether displacement wave. This is evidence of a moving 'particle', the solar system, having an associated aether wave.

    'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
    http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html

    "Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water."

    The 'pond' consists of aether. The moving 'particles' are the galaxy clusters. The ripple is an aether displacement wave. The ripple is a gravitational wave. This is also evidence of a moving 'particle', the galaxy clusters, having an associated aether wave.

    'Giant black hole kicked out of home galaxy'
    http://www.astronomy.com/en/News-Ob...ant black hole kicked out of home galaxy.aspx

    "But these new data support the idea that gravitational waves — ripples in the fabric of space first predicted by Albert Einstein but never detected directly — can exert an extremely powerful force."

    The fabric of space is the aether.

    Gravitational waves are ripples in the aether.

    What ripples when galaxy clusters collide is what waves in a double slit experiment; the aether.

    Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

    They are both aether displacement waves.

    'Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies'
    http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1004/1004.1475v1.pdf

    "Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very closely."

    The offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through the aether. The analogy is a submarine moving through the water. You are under water. Two miles away from you are many lights. Moving between you and the lights one mile away is a submarine. The submarine displaces the water. The state of displacement of the water causes the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water to be offset from the center of the submarine itself. The offset between the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water displaced by the submarine and the center of the submarine itself is going to remain the same as the submarine moves through the water. The submarine continually displaces different regions of the water. The state of the water connected to and neighboring the submarine remains the same as the submarine moves through the water even though it is not the same water the submarine continually displaces. This is what is occurring physically in nature as the galaxy clusters move through and displace the aether.

    'Milky Way's halo more squished than spherical'
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3473567...ys-halo-more-squished-spherical/#.TjkpbmDmE2c

    The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether. The matter which would form the Milky Way was moving as it displaced the aether. The aether displaced perpendicular to the major direction of motion became the majority force of the displaced aether and forced the matter into the disk. This resulted in the angular momentum of the matter. It is the aether which is displaced outward relative to the plane of the angular momentum which exerts force toward the center of the Milky Way. This force, along with the state of displacement of the aether as determined by the angular momentum of the Milky Way, forced the matter closer together which resulted in the displaced aether looking like a squished beach ball. Aether displacement explains how the Milky Way was created and how the disk and halo formed.

    'Ether and the Theory of Relativity - Albert Einstein'
    http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html

    "Since according to our present conceptions the elementary particles of matter are also, in their essence, nothing else than condensations of the electromagnetic field"

    The electromagnetic field is a state of the aether. Matter is condensations of aether.

    'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?' A. EINSTEIN
    http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf

    "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2."

    The mass of the body does diminish. However, the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished; it still exists, as aether. Matter evaporates into aether. As matter evaporates into aether it expands into neighboring places; which is energy. Mass is conserved.

    When a nuclear bomb explodes matter evaporates into aether. The evaporation is energy. Mass is conserved.

    The rate at which an atomic clock ticks is determined by the state of the aether in which it exists. In terms of general relativity, the greater the mass per volume of the matter the greater the displacement of the aether, the greater the force exerted toward and throughout the atomic clock by the displaced aether the slower the atomic clock ticks. In terms of special relativity, the faster a clock moves through the aether the more aether the clock displaces the more force the displaced aether exerts toward and throughout the atomic clock the slower the clock ticks.

    Curved spacetime is the state of displacement of the aether.

    'Was the universe born spinning?'
    http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/46688

    "The universe was born spinning and continues to do so around a preferred axis"

    The Universe spins around a preferred axis because the Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet; a larger version of a black hole polar jet.

    'Mysterious Cosmic 'Dark Flow' Tracked Deeper into Universe'
    http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/releases/2010/10-023.html

    "The clusters appear to be moving along a line extending from our solar system toward Centaurus/Hydra, but the direction of this motion is less certain. Evidence indicates that the clusters are headed outward along this path, away from Earth, but the team cannot yet rule out the opposite flow. "We detect motion along this axis, but right now our data cannot state as strongly as we'd like whether the clusters are coming or going," Kashlinsky said."

    The clusters are headed along this path because the Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet.

    The following is an image analogous of the Universal jet.

    http://aether.lbl.gov/image_all.html

    The reason for the 'expansion' of the universe is the continual emission of aether into the Universal jet. Three dimensional space associated with the Universe itself is not expanding. What we see in our telescopes is the matter associated with the Universe moving outward and away from the Universal jet emission point. In the image above, '1st Stars' is where aether condenses into matter.

    Dark energy is aether emitted into the Universal jet.

    It's not the Big Bang; it's the Big Ongoing.
     
  14. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,889
    Your idea is garbage which has been explained to you but you are apparently incapable of understanding the explanation. You are posting the same crap that you did almost a year ago as MPC755 and the sock puppet MPC7555 and the other sock puppets. Your silly idea was crap then - it is crap now - and it will be crap in the future. You are wasting your time on your delusion. And I am wasting my time talking to you, as you well know, because there is no force in existence which will sway you from your belief. If I didn't find you so annoying I would feel sorry for you.

    Cheers mate!
    Please feel free to continue to repost the same tired stuff again.

    gday
     
  15. gravitational_aether Banned Banned

    Messages:
    356
    So, you can't explain why the 'dark matter' is being left behind when galaxy clusters collide.

    'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image'
    http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

    "This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""

    The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

    There is nothing to 'leave behind'. Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.
     
  16. Prof.Layman totally internally reflected Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    982
    So then why are all Eskimos not incredibly fat? Say you win you a big vacation get away where you travel all around the world. You go to the Bahama's and then weigh yourself after putting on that bathing suit to go to the beach. It turns out you weigh 200 lbs. Then you think, wow, maybe when I get to visit the Eskimos by the North Pole I will weigh even more because I am not moving with the rotation of the Earth, that can be thousands of miles per hour. So at the North Pole I will move thousands of miles per hour less than I was traveling at the Bahama's. When you get to the North Pole you realize that you still weigh 200 lbs, bummer right? How could this problem be resolved without some type of non-baryonic dark matter? Or do you think this problem is resolved in General Relativity?
     
  17. gravitational_aether Banned Banned

    Messages:
    356
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equatorial_bulge#Differences_in_gravitational_acceleration

    "In summary, there are two contributions to the fact that the effective gravitational acceleration is less strong at the equator than at the poles. About 70 percent of the difference is contributed by the fact that objects circumnavigate the Earth's axis, and about 30 percent is due to the non-spherical shape of the Earth."

    The 30 percent is due to being closer to the center of the Earth at the poles which means there is more aether displaced by the Earth pushing down and exerting inward pressure toward the Earth causing you to weigh more.
     
  18. Prof.Layman totally internally reflected Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    982
    Doesn't sound like very much of a difference in gravitational acceleration given the difference in the relative velocity at the surface. Hard to imagine how traveling thousands of miles per hour on the surface of the Earth could only slightly change your weight. At that speed you would be traveling close to the escape velocity of the Earth. Then the difference of weight from the north pole wouldn't be very significant. I don't think it all adds up. A lot of the problems with dark matter is trying to explain the extra pull of bodies even though they are in large orbits traveling at fast relative speeds. I think this may have something to do with it, because dark matter doesn't really affect the "poles" of the galaxy. The wiki doesn't give an equation where you can translate how the speed of the Earths rotation alters the force felt by its gravitational attraction. I don't see how you can convert thousands of miles of hour to only fractions of m/s^2 of force felt. If the numbers didn't add up, I think it could help explain dark matter. But, if they do then I guess we are no better off trying to explain dark matter. I never heard of something actually weighing less at the North Pole before now, and I think if you went there you wouldn't notice much of a physical difference. You wouldn't even notice really changing in velocity by thousands of miles per hour by traveling to the north pole or even have to feel that much of a change in the forces of acceleration changing to that other velocity by traveling to the pole. You could in a sense travel to the north pole and remain feeling as though you kept a constant velocity without feeling the forces of acceleration from changing between this thousands of miles of hour at the equator to zero miles per hour at the north pole.
     
  19. gravitational_aether Banned Banned

    Messages:
    356
    Objects weigh more at the north pole.

    Using the term 'gravitational attraction' is incorrect.

    Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.
     
  20. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    Forty three pages of garbage and no end in sight.
     
  21. gravitational_aether Banned Banned

    Messages:
    356
    Explain why the 'dark matter' is being left behind when galaxy clusters collide.

    'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image'
    http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

    "This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""

    The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

    There is nothing to 'leave behind'. Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.
     
  22. brucep Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,098
    It really is annoying. The Alternative Theory [cesspool] is a reasonable tool for keeping the nonsense out of scientific discourse. I think there should be a limit to how long the nonsense posting can go on. Like you said 'the troll' is annoying folks into further irrelevant response.
     
  23. gravitational_aether Banned Banned

    Messages:
    356
    Explain why the 'dark matter' is being left behind when galaxy clusters collide.

    'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image'
    http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

    "This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""

    The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

    There is nothing to 'leave behind'. Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.
     

Share This Page