If there is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter, then why do you insist that there is this aether? I would classify aether under non-baryonic dark matter myself...
Luminiferous Aether Exists!
- Thread starter Mazulu
- Start date
Non-baryonic dark matter was hypothesized as being anchored to matter. This has been shown to be incorrect.
Galaxies spin at rates which can not be accounted for by the mass of the matter in the galaxy itself. This is the reason why it was hypothesized that there is 'missing mass'.
There is 'missing mass'. It is the aether. Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter. Displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter.
Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.
Galaxies move through and displace the aether.
Partilces of matter move through and displace the aether.
A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both.
Explain why you're an ineducable nuisance.
Wouldn't aether also then be anchored to matter?
This is why I mentioned the journey to the North Pole example. An object on the equator wouldn't fly off of the planet because it is close to the escape velocity. It would be as though some "missing mass" is holding everything on the equator down.
Again, so then wouldn't aether be non-baryonic dark matter? And then it would be anchored to matter?
So, you can't explain why the 'dark matter' is being left behind when galaxy clusters collide.
'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html
"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""
The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.
There is nothing to 'leave behind'. Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.
As far as we know, aether exists everywhere particles of matter do not.
The aether is, or behaves similar to, a supersolid. Objects move through and displace the aether.
'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html
"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""
The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.
Non-baryonic dark matter and galaxies are not anchored together. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.
So then there is no such thing as aether, either? There would be no need for aether if there wasn't non-baryonic dark matter.
Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter. Displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter.
Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.
A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both.
Sounds like non-baryonic dark matter to me! And I take it you didn't take old Mr. Einsteins advice about how gravitational aether can't explain electomagnetic phenomenon, he said you can't track particles in the gravitational aether as though they traveled normally through time. Let's see, you can touch the aether, you can't see the aether, and it contributes to a gravitational force. There is no way aether could not be considered to be non-baryonic dark matter. It is not made out of baryons and causes gravitational attraction from an unseen "object". I don't think you even know what your taking about, I try to give people some credit, but I don't think I can do it here. Saying that you know for certain that there is no non-baryonic dark matter but there has to be an aether really just doesn't make much sense. Your not helping just saying the same junk over and over.
Gravity has never been described as displaced non-baryonic dark matter pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter. The observed behaviors in a double slit experiment have never been explained by a moving particle having an associated non-baryonic dark matter displacement wave.
In the following article it is shown that non-baryonic dark matter is not anchored to matter. This refutes the notion of non-baryonic dark matter.
'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html
"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""
The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.
Non-baryonic dark matter and galaxies are not anchored together. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.
Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter. Displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter.
Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.
A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both.
Explain why you're an intellectually dishonest, ineducable, scientifically illiterate troll.
I actually choked on a cookie reading this one!
G_A
think you could come up with a different response than the above. I think there is some rule about just posting the same thing over and over.
So, you still can't explain why the 'dark matter' is being left behind when galaxy clusters collide.
'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html
"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""
The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.
There is nothing to 'leave behind'. Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.
Explain why the 'dark matter' is being left behind when galaxy clusters collide.
'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html
"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""
The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.
There is nothing to 'leave behind'. Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.
I take that as a NO!
As far as who knows? I think everyone reading this knows that there is not supposed to be aether in any conventional theory, with one exception of course.
In the orginal aether theory, it was not supposed to act like a supersolid and that is why it was done away with. The aether was done away with and was replaced by Einsteins notion of spacetime.
Translation : "Aether and galaxies are not conected to each other. There is no such thing as aether. Matter moves through and displaces this non-baryonic dark matter." If something is not a baryon then it is not a particle. Aether is not a particle. Dark matter is something that does not need to be a particle. If non-baryonic dark matter does not exist, then aether cannot exist. Aether would then be a form of non-baryonic dark matter. So non-baryonic is just saying that it is not a particle, and non-baryonic dark matter would be something that is causing a gravitational pull that is not a particle. Gravitational Aether would be something that causes gravitational attraction that is not a particle. So then gravitational aether would be non-baryonic dark matter.
I take that as a no, you can't explain why the 'dark matter' is being left behind when galaxy clusters collide.
'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html
"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""
The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.
There is nothing to 'leave behind'. Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.
So, you can't explain why the 'dark matter' is being left behind when galaxy clusters collide.
'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html
"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""
The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.
There is nothing to 'leave behind'. Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.