If so, was Nazi Germany defending itself in WWII?

For starters, war has to be declared between two countries. A country and a religion does not count.
If so, was Nazi Germany defending itself in WWII?
Yes, he's starting by attacking our soft underbelly. (Not you Cosmic, the OP)
It's a new approach to me though, and worth letting him have his run I think.
For starters, war has to be declared between two countries. A country and a religion does not count.
It may well have been his contention. But that link and headline don't exactly support it since his contention was published 8 years before that event. An event that, even according to that linked article, was a retaliation for Hitler "sticking it" to them.It was Hitler's contention in his book that the Jews were economically and politically sticking it to the German people.
-snip-
After reading Hitler's book I thought he was either dilusional or there were real things he was concerned about. Well, which was it? Did he have it all wrong?
So did they actually "mess up Germany"? The lack of any figures (or other evidence so far) showing that they did any damage to the German economy would, from your own remarks, suggest that they didn't really want to do it...If the nation of Judea wanted to mess with a country believe me they could mess it up easily.
After reading Hitler's book I thought he was either dilusional or there were real things he was concerned about. Well, which was it? Did he have it all wrong?
After reading Hitler's book I thought he was either dilusional or there were real things he was concerned about. Well, which was it? Did he have it all wrong?
After reading Hitler's book I thought he was either dilusional or there were real things he was concerned about. Well, which was it? Did he have it all wrong?
Did he have it all wrong?
Probably.
I can't think of anything he was right about.
That was the Romans.Aqueducts?
I'll give you that one.Volkswagen?
Oh, how clever to steal other people's ideas and try to use them to insult someone.
The Jewish people are a nation without borders. Sort of like but not really like Islam. The difference is Muslims are poor and they use bombs and guns on their enemies. Jews tend to be wealthy and use money on people. George Soros and his occasional economic tsunamis are a case in point. If the nation of Judea wanted to mess with a country believe me they could mess it up easily. It would be child's play for them.
So what does that make christianity?
Im sorry desi, but Hitler was a wackjob.
I'll play devil's advocate here. Lets say your right. The Jews are attempting to control a country.
If the Jews are so good at it, then why did they let Hitler rise to power in the first place?
Also, how do you go from the point of hating them, to mass extermination? Why not just push them out of your country?
I can tell you, as a Jew, there is no conspiracy.
Besides the fact, a world controlled by Jews and Muslims, is that really so bad?
Yes it is bad, a world controlled by any religious group is not desirable!Quinnsong
Last I checked neither ethnicity started multiple genocides. Nor crusades. They don't start such idiotic wars as the US has. Or even Christianity has.
Christians may win the pissing contest but Jews and Muslims are certainly pissing.Quinnsong
When you simplify things to their basest form, all that the Islamic people want, and all the Jews want are to be left alone. What to kill each other?
The Christian world has done a real number on these people, what goes around comes around.
A religion cannot be a nation. End of story.
He wanted to replace religions with a Nazi version of Christianity.
Which was going to be Catholicism because the Vatican supplied him with a great amount of money to help him build his military.![]()
And looked the other way when it came to the camps.
And looked the other way when it came to the camps.
Which was going to be Catholicism because the Vatican supplied him with a great amount of money to help him build his military.![]()
Plus only recently, after over 60 years of denial, finally appoligized.