You consider it to be a different subject, then you say it's "just about paying attention to what is and what isn't".
And why are you responding to me and changing the subject? At no time did I say anything about "rational analysis".
Rational analysis is different from English because it involves math and pattern recognition also. These are the only ways in which it is different. You also mentioned being able to analyze what you read and/or write.
Perhaps it's a good idea to not comment or make generalisations about something you clearly do not understand.
It actually is, because it allows me to refine my idea's by being corrected and having them elaborated upon, which is why I do it so often.
Without defining what you consider to be "crooked and wrong".
I haven't defined that yes. I was speaking about what is objectively crooked and wrong here. Anyway, as for what I consider wrong, that is: bossiness, neediness, vulgarity, stupidity, naysaying, and my roman nose, and that pretty much covers it.
It's not much like that. It tends to focus more on the utopian side of things than the handmaid's tale does and it also pretty much makes fun of everything.
Keep in mind that you won't change anyone's mind when you are barely able to master the English language, and you certainly won't change anyone's mind when you use said language to post inane comments with little regard for what is factual.
I am actually extremely adept at English. I gave my self instructions on how to speak in order to get my point across. They were: Separate all truth from all falsity in whatever you encounter. Separate all sure from all unsure in whatever you say. Tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the relevant truth. Respond to opinions with either an agreement or a disagreement. Think the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the relevant truth.
I also acquired an extensive vocabulary because I tended to read a lot when I was younger.
I wouldn't say that my comments are inane per se, except for the one's meant to make fun of things. In my opinion, none of them are inane except for the one's intended as jokes.
I didn't say you were weak. Changing the subject again? Or simply unable to understand what is written? Bet you're missing those "ENGLISH" classes now, huh?
I understood what was written. I was just under the impression that you were implying that I was weak.
I will never miss English class.
I would say that is pretty obvious.
Okay. Maybe it is.
Something something about contradictory applies here..
It doesn't.
And if you were having this discussion with kids in grade school, you might have a point. I say might, because even that is a high bar for you at present.
It's not that no one is really a challenge for you, child. It's that no one is going to want to proverbially put a child in their place on an internet forum, because that would just be mean.
It is that nobody is a challenge for me verbally, because for one thing I don't care about being wrong, and for another thing I argue perfectly, because of my aforementioned instructions on how to do so.
Anyway, what is my "place?" Is that the same place that all of those pathetic losers including you have tried to put me in time and time again? That abstract hierarchical construct which makes them feel big? I reject hierarchical constructs.
I rarely have a point about anything. So what?
We live in hope that one day you figure out how to use the software on this site, particularly the quote options so we know what you are actually addressing in a point.
Okay. I guess I might eventually.
How are they going to forcibly vaccinate people?
With needles and strong people.
The government says you need to obtain a driver's licence before you drive and they also say that to obtain that licence, you need to pass a driving test. Do you think complying with that is silly because 'just because the government says so, it should happen"?
No, except that I think it should only apply to public roads, as a libertarian.
Every single law passed, all the legislation, policies, is essentially the government saying so and it does happen. That is the rule. The government says don't speed, it's dangerous and if you speed, you get a fine. That is the rule. The government says you need to wear a seatbelt and that children have to be in car seats and if people don't comply, they can be charged or even arrested, as it's dangerous to drive kids around without car seats or seatbelts. That is the rule. Do you think they are wrong? Or are you just going to wing it and put the baby in someone's lap, because hey, just because the government said it, doesn't mean it should happen, right?
For one thing I am never going to have a baby. Ew. For another thing I do think it is wrong to make people wear seat belts when they drive, but I do not think that the government is wrong that it makes the journey safer. It is true that just because the government says something doesn't mean it should happen. However, in a free country, if the government says that something is a rule, the chances are it should happen. In totalitarian countries the contrary applies. Authority does not guarantee that the entity possessing it makes good decisions.
Instead of learning the difference between 'there', 'their', 'they're', you're on sciforums telling a bunch of strangers how no one can really challenge you.
I won't bother saying how I think you should be spending your time. And I'm not saying this to be bitchy, but in the hope that you further your studies and actually do something worthwhile with your life. You say you are a writer? If that is the case, it is important to actually do very well in English and literature. Without it, you won't get far. If you wish to be a writer, you also need to be a good researcher, understand and know history, understand laws (particularly laws pertaining to intellectual property) so that you don't make silly statements or mistakes. The reason I think you are lazy is because you make absolutely no effort to educate yourself on the issues you post on and instead, you make ridiculous statements.
I know the difference's between those words. I just wasn't paying proper attention to what I was writing whilst typing this and that is why I used the word their where it wasn't the right word to use and the word there was. I will learn to pay better attention to things.
The way I educate myself about things is by making ridiculous statements and having them ridiculed. I don't mind it. I am not lazy. I know English rather well. As for the laws, I am sure I can find sufficient loopholes in them if it comes to that, but I don't plan on plagiarizing so I doubt it will.
As for my kids, I'm pretty sure they'll be fine..
Okay. Perhaps they will.
As I said, you are lazy.
You want things to be easy and do not want to work for it.
I'm not. I do. That is why I can solve various Rubik's cube's and debate really well and do a handstand for more than 10 seconds and bend right over forwards and backwards and play various musical instruments at an advanced level and solve complicated math problems. I will take everything that I want from this life. There is only a little bit left to go.
