End of Infinity

the way u reason is totally opposite to mine

there cant b different numbers, objective is always one reality the most superior one including everything existing

this is how there is only one objective and plural freedoms so individuality, they are not numbers when they have to b objective in certain perspective of existing themselves constantly since alone

ur ways of reasonnin is always meanin outcomes so creations justifications which are lies since it is clear now how all is done by force and hitting, it has nothing to do with the real states of things, it is always regarding the powers on things wills

i see ur religious means trinity to square, and hre again it shows how u dont mean any infinity u mean only an argument for god powers

i will reply to that wat i said before, infinity is always so it is not between numbers while it is always the void, which prove that there is no numbers

nature is positive lies so natural numbers are only the way of natural evil life

it is amazing how u can believe that u individually are more then infinite while u cant b present since u never realize anything since u always are from what u get of living realities

how for u infinity is like some things to know and use like dead tools say a lot of what evil is always from
 
absols said:
the way u reason is totally opposite to mine

there cant b different numbers, objective is always one reality the most superior one including everything existing

this is how there is only one objective and plural freedoms so individuality, they are not numbers when they have to b objective in certain perspective of existing themselves constantly since alone

ur ways of reasonnin is always meanin outcomes so creations justifications which are lies since it is clear now how all is done by force and hitting, it has nothing to do with the real states of things, it is always regarding the powers on things wills

i see ur religious means trinity to square, and hre again it shows how u dont mean any infinity u mean only an argument for god powers

i will reply to that wat i said before, infinity is always so it is not between numbers while it is always the void, which prove that there is no numbers

nature is positive lies so natural numbers are only the way of natural evil life

it is amazing how u can believe that u individually are more then infinite while u cant b present since u never realize anything since u always are from what u get of living realities

how for u infinity is like some things to know and use like dead tools say a lot of what evil is always from
Click to expand...
Punctuation & spelling - you might want to look into them... At least, if you want anybody to have a clue as to what you're trying to say. (And if you don't, then why bother?)
 
u have no right to judge my style of writing, im free to give my opinions on ur sarcastic wills
for me it is disgusting how u dare think puting infinite in sandwich between numbers u control or know

nobody need any clue, when it is obvious that ur reasons are evil so the more right is said the more evil live from enjoying to abuse it

that is how my mean is opposite to what u think, that if i might think any mean to my free expression and reactions rights which is not ur business and nothing to justify, all to evil revelation being all, so anything u say or mean to do is a lie

wat is funny is how u talk to ur opposite of rules that it must respect too

it shows the arrogant u r

who made those rules, what is ur argument how ur ennemy would care about giving u wat u want

u have no idea how to argue with others, u cant face a fight in words

which exhibit the religious u r puting all his faith on else powers to pretend being a philosopher or brave
 
absols said:
u have no right to judge my style of writing, im free to give my opinions on ur sarcastic wills
for me it is disgusting how u dare think puting infinite in sandwich between numbers u control or know

nobody need any clue, when it is obvious that ur reasons are evil so the more right is said the more evil live from enjoying to abuse it

that is how my mean is opposite to what u think, that if i might think any mean to my free expression and reactions rights which is not ur business and nothing to justify, all to evil revelation being all, so anything u say or mean to do is a lie

wat is funny is how u talk to ur opposite of rules that it must respect too

it shows the arrogant u r

who made those rules, what is ur argument how ur ennemy would care about giving u wat u want

u have no idea how to argue with others, u cant face a fight in words

which exhibit the religious u r puting all his faith on else powers to pretend being a philosopher or brave
Click to expand...
I have too little time to waste any of it on fools. Welcome to ignore.
 
Arioch said:
Give me every possible amount of money between three and four dollars. :p
Click to expand...

for life?

because every possible amount of money between three and four dollars is a finite amount since the lowest denomination is 1 cent, unlike just a number.
So every possible amount of money between three and four dollars would be something like this: 3.01+3.02+3.03...+3.99, a total sum of 346 dollars and 50 cents for your entire life.
Taking an average of 80 years per our human lifespan, you would have a little more than 1 cent per each day to spend for everything. See how far that goes.

gmilam said:
I have too little time to waste any of it on fools. Welcome to ignore.
Click to expand...

nor is arrogance a quality of an intellect.
 
There are no numbers in the Universe, just physics. Infinity is physics, like the physics of a circle.. ends that join together. You have to remember that the Universe is all about physics, and you have to break free of maths, and think in shapes, and forces. Now some of you talk about time having a beginning.. time is physics also. It is a stage of motion...

You walk into a room, the juggler is already juggling 3 balls in a circular motion. You do not know which ball he threw first. So all you see is a circular motion, and you do not know it's beginning. That is time. Physics that are in a completely looped series of motions.

Infinity is time looped to create motions that have no beginning or end.
 
Pincho_Paxton said:
There are no numbers in the Universe, just physics. Infinity is physics, like the physics of a circle.. ends that join together. You have to remember that the Universe is all about physics, and you have to break free of maths, and think in shapes, and forces. Now some of you talk about time having a beginning.. time is physics also. It is a stage of motion...

You walk into a room, the juggler is already juggling 3 balls in a circular motion. You do not know which ball he threw first. So all you see is a circular motion, and you do not know it's beginning. That is time. Physics that are in a completely looped series of motions.

Infinity is time looped to create motions that have no beginning or end.
Click to expand...

Some interesting thoughts there PP!
Prompted the question:
"Infinity as described commonly, can only exist with time. Time is also infinite [ whether we perceive or believe in a beginning and end or not, is irrelevant]
so if the existence of infinity is dependent on infinite time are the two infinities the same infinity?

Surely time is dependent on substance [volume] just as much as substance is dependent on time.
...or something to that effect...
|
|
--------------eternity
|
|
(infinity)
t=0
 
There is one big problem with infinity only existing in time: at t = 0, the universe had infinite density and energy.
How is this possible if time had a value of 0?
It's possible if energy can exist independently of time, so PP's explanation doesn't stand up (if it's true that the universe had infinite energy without time).

If there are no numbers in the universe, does that mean there's nothing to count? If it does, why does the universe contain observers who count ('things')?
 
arfa brane said:
There is one big problem with infinity only existing in time: at t = 0, the universe had infinite density and energy.
How is this possible if time had a value of 0?
It's possible if energy can exist independently of time, so PP's explanation doesn't stand up (if it's true that the universe had infinite energy without time).
Click to expand...
excellent point!
For surely it takes time for something to exist. if time has zero duration then nothing can exist.

therefore one could conclude that time duration = energy or energy = time duration.
that energy is movement [ time ]

So therefore infinity [volume at t=0] is dependent on infinite time [energy - eternity - entropy]

Totally circular and self justifying.. as it needs to be..IMO

So when you read E=mc^2
read
Time duration = mc^2
as a mental exercise...
better still:
try
Eternity = mc^2

attachment.php


View attachment 6393
 
Last edited:
We have circulating systems on Earth, like Water to steam to cloud to rain, to water. The Universe could just re-organise itself. The Milky Way would be like a cloud, and we moved to this position from the outskirts of observation, then the Milky Way breaks down into the equivalent of water again. That's also infinity.
 
Quantum_Quack said:
For surely it takes time for something to exist. if time has zero duration then nothing can exist.
Click to expand...
That's a standard objection to the theory: how can anything have existed if time didn't exist?
The theory appears to get around the problem by invoking the principle that the universe after one Planck-second of time was essentially the same universe (with a very small volume). So that appears to mean that Planck time isn't measurable.
 
The way that you think of time doesn't register with me. I can't follow the logic. All I do is eliminate time dilation with theoretical physics. Once you eliminate time dilation there is no proof left that time isn't just a change of energy states. What's wrong with just changing direction inside X/Y/Z. So if X/Y/Z is a point that point has a core which is time a change in direction like an apple core in a sphere. The core travels down the centre, the sphere is the X/Y/Z.. time is the core forcing out the sphere. So we live in a world of atoms, and X/Y/Z is always a membrane, we never get to be a part of the core of an atom. So those forces are inside X/Y/Z.
 
Pincho_Paxton said:
The way that you think of time doesn't register with me. I can't follow the logic. All I do is eliminate time dilation with theoretical physics. Once you eliminate time dilation there is no proof left that time isn't just a change of energy states. What's wrong with just changing direction inside X/Y/Z. So if X/Y/Z is a point that point has a core which is time a change in direction like an apple core in a sphere. The core travels down the centre, the sphere is the X/Y/Z.. time is the core forcing out the sphere. So we live in a world of atoms, and X/Y/Z is always a membrane, we never get to be a part of the core of an atom. So those forces are inside X/Y/Z.
Click to expand...

i cant focus on such relative justifications, but from reading fast i think u have the right answer to time

time is like cancer, smthg that would die after a while that cant last by itself so must b of else will force, and what surely cant, even with all forces for, stand forever

like genders too like opposites...all these concepts are to serve creations outside of the true existence dimension

so actually time is essentially about taking advantage of the present so forcing the advantage as the replacement to it

bc im true they call me a thing, which show how shit is all, there is no least consideration or respect to true existence from any god
 
arfa brane said:
That's a standard objection to the theory: how can anything have existed if time didn't exist?
The theory appears to get around the problem by invoking the principle that the universe after one Planck-second of time was essentially the same universe (with a very small volume). So that appears to mean that Planck time isn't measurable.
Click to expand...
If I am not mistaken the Planck moment [scale] is an arbitrary construct, merely an abstraction in an attempt to facilitate further understandings. [In other words the Planck unit does not exist except as a human abstraction. [Same with "infinitesimals"]
 
Rational Logical On A Roll........

Quantum Quack said:
excellent point!For surely it takes time for something to exist. if time has zero duration then nothing can exist.
Click to expand...

Quantum Quack, score one for your rationally logical conclusion, or at least acknoledging some one else's conclusion.

therefore one could conclude that time duration = energy or energy = time duration.
that energy is movement [ time ]
Click to expand...

Your on 'makes sense' roll dude.

So therefore infinity [volume at t=0] is dependent on infinite time [energy - eternity - entropy]
Click to expand...

Lost me there dude. The only infinities is the concepts of such and non-occupied space beyond our finite occupied space aka fermions, bosons and any combinations thereof.

Totally circular and self justifying.. as it needs to be..IMO So when you read E=mc^2
read Time duration = mc^2
as a mental exercise... better still:
try Eternity = mc^2
Click to expand...

Lost me there also.

Outside the circle non-occupied space

Line that defines the circle- O = occupied space

Inside the circle non-occupied space.


That is one way to represent infinite non-occupied space and finite occupied space. Simple enough.

Time = frequency and motion and inherent to existence of occupied space.

Mind/intelligence inherent to comprehension of concept of infinite and a non-occupied space beyond the finite Universe. imho

Infinity what is it good for, absolutely nothing.

r6
Click to expand...
 
rr6,

I like your equations for "space (ethereal)

Perhaps non-occupied space where material is involved (<man made material) the number for unoccupied space may be the number 5.

:)

In subject of inifinite ethereal I innocently like 11 and 8, perhaps then 9 and beginning again with 1.
 
@rr6
So therefore infinity [volume at t=0] is dependent on infinite time [energy - eternity - entropy]
Click to expand...
Lost me there dude. The only infinities is the concepts of such and non-occupied space beyond our finite occupied space aka fermions, bosons and any combinations thereof.
Click to expand...
The point was badly expressed , sorry..
try:
For infinite volume to exist at any given t=0 duration moment, time,movement, change thus energy must also be eternal [time*infinity] [entropy].

Simply put:
It is like this:
Gravity is a phenomena that occurs at any t=0
But can only do so if time is eternal. For with out Time there is no gravity - a totally self justifying and self generating system
have another look at the quick and badly done diagram:
attachment.php


and possibly see if you can get the gist of what I am proposing...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top