Well, what are the questions that the situation suggests?
They need to make sure that he didn't lock her in there. They need to make sure that she wasn't previously disabled and intentionally neglected. That this outcome isn't the result of some sadistic exploitation. That he did not knowingly neglect a psychiatric issue.
Barring any specific evidence, there won't be any charges. But look at those last three paragraphs of the source citation. So let's go ahead and give the benefit of the doubt and presume that accurately represents the situation. Still, doesn't it just sound strange?
And no, I haven't seen Idiocracy.
They need to make sure that he didn't lock her in there. They need to make sure that she wasn't previously disabled and intentionally neglected. That this outcome isn't the result of some sadistic exploitation. That he did not knowingly neglect a psychiatric issue.
Barring any specific evidence, there won't be any charges. But look at those last three paragraphs of the source citation. So let's go ahead and give the benefit of the doubt and presume that accurately represents the situation. Still, doesn't it just sound strange?
And no, I haven't seen Idiocracy.