VI: Exactly! Ever notice how many of the guys who gripe like this are just icky?
You don't get it. Looks are an important component because sexual attraction isn't just about your mind, it's about the body. Looks are not the only component, but they are a necessary one.
Straw man. I did not say looks trumped everything else. I said they were A necessary component for attraction, I did not say they were the be all and end all.
As for your "evidence", please post a hyperlink.
@Takandjive, that is pretty much my mentality too. Looks are important, but personality is a necessary component too. I don't want someone who is good looking but boring, or rightwing or sexist.
This is the point I keep trying to make to Watson, but it keeps going over his head.
That's not how it works. You made the claim, so you back it up with links. Don't make people do your leg work for you.Ever heard of doing an advanced search on Google?
Which why I commented on it being how you read it.It came across as a personal insult.
Keep trying.Wrong again. Science is about statistical generalizations that eventually become facts, by means of being falsified through repeated experimentation.
Oops, wrong again idiot.That's because you're female.
From the introduction of that study...
Oh, I agree, looks are everything especially when it comes to female attraction. Women are attracted to looks, in terms of big muscles and large wads of cash, because women are genetically hard-wired to be selfish, materialistic, and superficial. However, men are only attracted to those looks, such as youth and fertility, which are necessary for the propagation of the human species... and many more men will sleep with anything regardless of looks. Only dominant Alpha males pursue beautiful women and that is a small minority of men.
I agree with you there. Looks are certainly necessary for the female version of attraction.
Ever heard of doing an advanced search on Google?
I'm quoting DIRECTLY from the the introduction.You're quoting the study out of context.
Or that you like making false generalisations and daft assumptions.The only thing that this thread demonstrates is that most women really, truly do hate sex.
Oh, I agree, looks are everything especially when it comes to female attraction. Women are attracted to looks, in terms of big muscles and large wads of cash, because women are genetically hard-wired to be selfish, materialistic, and superficial. However, men are only attracted to those looks, such as youth and fertility, which are necessary for the propagation of the human species... and many more men will sleep with anything regardless of looks. Only dominant Alpha males pursue beautiful women and that is a small minority of men.
I agree with you there. Looks are certainly necessary for the female version of attraction.
Ever heard of doing an advanced search on Google?
One, you didn't read my point, I said looks were AN IMPORTANT COMPONENT, I did not say they were EVERYTHING.Oh, I agree, looks are everything especially when it comes to female attraction.
However, men are only attracted to those looks, such as youth and fertility, which are necessary for the propagation of the human species...
Translation: I hate sex, except when there's money and big muscles involved.
Anyone else think this Watson guy lacks logic?
On one hand, he thinks women are superficial because they value looks.
On the other, he thinks it is fine that men value looks.
?????
I don't like fucking ugly chicks. You ever wonder if your standards are so low cause they have to be?
Is any of this true?
Why do women hate sex?
Nonsense, women have always hated sex.
Women are the same wherever you go.
...women are genetically hard-wired to be selfish, materialistic, and superficial.
I think the truth has to come out one way or the other.
Seriously though, can this thread be moved to the cesspool?