What is reality ?

[Mark Turner]

Beg pardon

Explain please

Day and night is a spin cycle , yesterday was one rotation of a cycle , tomorrow is one spin cycle of today .
. Today is rotation .

The time where ever you are is now 0 , where I am it is also 0, this never changes , the only change is ourselves and our aging .

 

[Dywyddyr]

There is no yesterday or tomorrow , that is day and night subjective and made up .

No.

The time where ever you are is now 0 , where I am it is also 0, this never changes , the only change is ourselves and our aging .

No.

 

[Mark Turner]

No.

No.

Hmm , yes unless you want to make up things .

 

[Dywyddyr]

Hmm , yes unless you want to make up things .

Also no.

 

[Mark Turner]

Also no.

I see your science discussion ability is limited to thinking inside a box , presently stating no with no explanation of why no ! Time is a human made construct , not something that exists as an independent entity . It is wrong of you to say no , without explanation to the readers of why no . Your say so , doesn't mean anything , you are not the whole of science , you can't even give a no argument .

 

[Dywyddyr]

I see your science discussion ability is limited to thinking inside a box , presently stating no with no explanation of why no !

And wrong again.
YOU have been making statements/ claims with zero explanation. Since you didn't bother to do anything than simply state your unsupported opinion there's no need for me to provide any reasoned rebuttal.

Time is a human made construct , not something that exists as an independent entity .

According to your unsupported and unscientific opinion.

It is wrong of you to say no , without explanation to the readers of why no . Your say so , doesn't mean anything , you are not the whole of science , you can't even give a no argument .

That which is claimed without evidence may be rebutted without evidence.
Similarly your say so (that time doesn't exist) doesn't mean anything - it's simply an unsupported claim.
It's dishonest of you to ask me provide argument/ reason when you yourself have not done so with your initial claims.

 

[Mark Turner]

And wrong again.
YOU have been making statements/ claims with zero explanation. Since you didn't bother to do anything than simply state your unsupported opinion there's no need for me to provide any reasoned rebuttal.

According to your unsupported and unscientific opinion.

That which is claimed without evidence may be rebutted without evidence.
Similarly your say so (that time doesn't exist) doesn't mean anything - it's simply an unsupported claim.
It's dishonest of you to ask me provide argument/ reason when you yourself have not done so with your initial claims.

Things that are obvious need no other explanation . We need not make mountains out of mole hills with subjectivity . Suggesting time is anything other than aging is subjective . I think you may be confusing yourself with linguistics . Timed and timing having different context than time (aging).

Two train carriages facing each other , a distance apart on a linear section of track simultaneously flash their lights at each other at precisely 00:00:00

The train carriages are 1l.s apart


What timed, does each carriage observe each other ?


This is called relativity and simultaneity .

 

[Write4U]

I also have noticed every moment you have described TIME you have only given descriptions, never a property

Time has no properties, it provides temporal permissions for a series of events to occur in a chronological order. A Time-line (age) of a thing is a result of and emerges from the historical persistence of that thing in reality.

Time is not a property of a thing, other than as a temporal measurement of its persistence in reality.

In other words, Time is what emerges when a there is a persistent chronology of sequential NOWs for a physical pattern. Time is somewhat similar to a film strip of a motion picture, where the strip consists of a series of still frames which when replayed in chronological sequence represent an accurate picture of the rate and type of changes recorded by the camera.

In order to view a 2hr motion picture you must give a temporal permission to set aside a 2 hr block of time in order to experience the recorded chronology of reality as you replay the recording.

You cannot show a 2 hr movie in 15 min and experience the same chronology (sequence of nows) as it occurred at that time

 

[Dywyddyr]

Things that are obvious need no other explanation .

It's only "obvious" to you - and you're wrong.

Suggesting time is anything other than aging is subjective

According to you.

I think you may be confusing yourself with linguistics . Timed and timing having different context than time (aging).

Wrong.

Two train carriages facing each other , a distance apart on a linear section of track simultaneously flash their lights at each other at precisely 00:00:00
The train carriages are 1l.s apart
What timed, does each carriage observe each other ?
This is called relativity and simultaneity .

Nope.

 

[Write4U]

The time where ever you are is now 0 , where I am it is also 0, this never changes , the only change is ourselves and our aging .

That doesn't make sense to me.

The time is not where you are but when you (and all physical things) are and it always has a value of greater than zero, else it cannot represent an observable existence at all.

t = 0 = no measurable temporal existence.

 

[Mark Turner]

It's only "obvious" to you - and you're wrong.

According to you.

Wrong.

Nope.

You obviously don't know much about the physical process . Your bi ased opinion is subjective , saying something is wrong , doesn't make it wrong unless you can demonstrate the wrongness .
Other members seem to understand time well enough , you seem to struggle with simple physics .

 

[Mark Turner]

That doesn't make sense to me.
The time is not where you are but when you are and it always has a value of greater than zero, else it cannot represent an observable existence at all.

t = 0 = no measurable temporal existence.

∆t=0

∆aging = 1 second per second timed

 

[Dywyddyr]

You obviously don't know much about the physical process .

Oops, wrong.

Your bi ased opinion is subjective , saying something is wrong , doesn't make it wrong unless you can demonstrate the wrongness

You're the one that made the claim. Show that you're right.

Other members seem to understand time well enough

Allegedly.

you seem to struggle with simple physics .

Given that you don't understand any physics this is somewhat hilarious.

∆t=0
∆aging = 1 second per second timed

Unmitigated drivel.

 

[Michael 345]

Day and night is a spin cycle , yesterday was one rotation of a cycle , tomorrow is one spin cycle of today .
. Today is rotation .

The time where ever you are is now 0 , where I am it is also 0, this never changes , the only change is ourselves and our aging .

Different way to express but explained OK

∆t=0

∆aging = 1 second per second timed

1 second is not timed - it is a arbitrary measurement between two arbitrary NOW

The arbitrary second has been designated to a arbitrary definition value derived from a reasonable stable frequency for convenience of science

 

[Mark Turner]

Oops, wrong.

You're the one that made the claim. Show that you're right.

Allegedly.

Given that you don't understand any physics this is somewhat hilarious.

Unmitigated drivel.

Your denial is extraordinarily strange . I sometimes get it backwards but this time I know I'm certain and on top of my game . Your argument is not providing any value in the discussion . I might be at the bottom of the ladder for now , but one day I'll make it hopefully to add to my life experience .

 

[Dywyddyr]

but this time I know I'm certain

You may very well be certain. It doesn't stop you being wrong.

Your argument is not providing any value in the discussion

Neither is yours. Unsupported claims aren't science, nor are they a basis for discussion.

I might be at the bottom of the ladder for now , but one day I'll make it hopefully to add to my life experience .

I suggest that you also add "learning science" as opposed to just making sh*t up. It'll help you considerably.

 

[Michael 345]

Time has no properties

So 4 words - POOF - TIME proven not to exist

Concept OK ✓ Existence X

The time is not where you are but when you (and all physical things) are

ie NOW
_____________

Managed to watch Part 2 of BBC program Nothing

Picked up a few snippets, will try and find out more about the Dirac Equation

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_equation

Now - sleep

 

[Dywyddyr]

So 4 words - POOF - TIME proven not to exist

Hardly.

 

[Michael 345]

Hardly.

OK

Care to provide evidence in the form of a property of TIME?

 

[Dywyddyr]

OK
Care to provide evidence in the form of a property of TIME?

Here we go again...
The claim was yours.
What properties does length have?
Do you also deny the existence of that? Along with breadth and depth and thus volume?