As per title .
What is reality ?
- Thread starter Mark Turner
- Start date
I find reality is lies after more lies , especially in science .
Denial of obvious truths as if some subjective virus is pre programmed within you all .
C constant isn't even a speed of light , it is an energy transition to a lesser energy state position within the Higgs field .
Deny the truth as always ...
Mainstream thinking can be thought of as a virus of a sort .
Stuck in the circle of thinking .
Last edited:
I don't think you really know enough science to make an informed judgment.
Obvious truths like what? If these truths are so obvious, why do you think people/scientists deny them?
You know that sentence doesn't actually mean anything. Right?
If you're really interested in science and want to actually learn something, at some point you're going to need to stop telling and start asking.
I do ask questions .
Science doesn't answer them .
Maybe I'm more advanced than science with my questions .
Is C constant a transition speed rather than a propulsion speed?
Spectral emissions suggests so ...
I have a tough time at times understanding that many can not understand what I , understand . It happens and has happened through out the history of scientific understanding of things .
Reality .
Please do not troll.
The technical term for misunderstanding is neurological simultaneity .
More often than not, I see you making statements that one or another bit of science is wrong, but then it rapidly becomes clear that you don't even understand what you're trying to criticise.
Like what?
Advanced in what way? What do you mean by "advanced"? What are you advancing? What's your contribution to human knowledge, above and beyond what science has offered?
Explain:
(a) what do you mean by "c constant"? Are you talking about the speed of light in vaccuum, or something else?
(b) what do you think the difference between a "transition speed" and a "propulsion speed" is?
(b) what it is about spectral emissions, specifically, that suggests that 'c constant' is a transition speed?
Once you've explained what you mean, then I'll do my best to try to answer your question.
You have a tough time stringing a couple of sentences together so that they mean something.
Rather than pretending you know profound stuff that the rest of us are all missing, why don't you instead work on putting your ideas into a coherent form, then expressing them clearly so we can have a useful discussion about them?
Like Mark Turner, you should also spend less time preaching to us that you know better and more time asking questions and trying to learn something real.
What I struggle to understand is what's in it for you when you waste your own and everybody else's time in the way that you do. Are you trying to confuse people? Do you enjoy playing the fool? Or is posting here just a way for you to fill in time, like talking to the tv or something?
I'm only on a phone and for me it is difficult to explain in full without a PC to type on , so please forgive my lack of completeness in replies .
I'm advancing science in every way possible .
I understand the gravity mechanism
I understand the nature of light
I understand SR and can improve on Einstein .
Sorry , I hate phones , screens to small , pisses me off typing ...
I want a Nobel prize ,
Do you know I have the physics for an atomizer but couldn't even get a conversation about it ? Etc ...
I have innovation for tech ...I can Educate...
Last edited:
You sound delusional.
Where is your work published?
Okay. Link me to some of your publications. I'm interested to read the details of your advancements in science.
Great!
So, which of your publications are you relying on to get yourself nominated for a prize? Please link me to them so I can take a look for myself.
---
I must say, this line of discussion seems to be taking us down the kind of road a troll would pursue. I sure hope you can produce the goods you promise. If you can't, then I'll almost be forced to conclude that this is a con job on your part. It would be unfortunate if I had to ban you for trolling.
So, here's your chance to be honest. Good luck!
I've done no publications as such because nobody has ever give me respect and trust .
Additionally some of my tech ideas are not really for just any Tom , Dick or Harry .
In simple terms , nobody seems interested so why should I bother ?
You've already bothered. You posted, claiming to have scientific insights into various things, but now you're saying you can't be bothered to explain your ideas or to support the claims you chose to make. We didn't come to you; you came to us.
From now on, given that you can't be bothered explaining anything, I expect you to cease making claims such as the following:
Empty statements like these will be treated as trollbait.Mark Turner said:
If you think you "understand the gravity mechanism" and can improve on current theories of gravity, you need to present your ideas clearly and be prepared to answer questions and defend them against objections. If, for whatever reason, you are unable or unwilling to do that, then your ideas have no place here, and certainly no place in science. In fact, the above statements are mere empty assertions, as they stand - pointless fluff.
Moreover, if you believe your grand ideas are too advanced for the likes of others, you should not bring them up. Keep them to yourself. Nobody will care.
That's just a whole lot of crap...apologies if I'm not as nice about it as James.
First thing anyway is that "C" has nothing to do with light, it is the symbol for Carbon. The speed of light in a vacuum is "c"
Plus of course everything you say is totally falsified by the scientific methodology, and the fact that even the most accepted of a scientific theories are forever being put to the test.
Go read something reputable...stop pretending and having yourself on. Learn something.