What is reality ?

Yet here you remain, wallowing in your usual delusional state!:rolleyes:
Well, rest assured I'll keep trying to succeed , delusional or not .
I think my interpretation of the Universe is quite good but others don't seem to share my personal opinion and don't cooperate in helping me . Science can be confusing as reality , but I believe if we share our science thoughts we can find answers to both science and reality .
 
I guess they must know what they're talking about then .
I don't see any real objective arguments about what I've said in this thread , plus the one post I mentioned fire in , must make some sort of sense to somebody?
That person seemed to go in for joke algebra, too.
 
That person seemed to go in for joke algebra, too.
Perhaps , unluckily for them , they'd developed a new form of math and nobody noticed.
I can't really comment without reading the whole thread.
It can be very difficult at times to understand people , I'd say the person was uncertain in themselves maybe . We do all think differently after all .
 
Well, rest assured I'll keep trying to succeed , delusional or not
The problem is that you don't learn. Ergo: you may "keep trying" but you'll also keep failing.
Science can be confusing as reality
Since your grasp of either/ both is, at best, exceedingly tenuous, I'm not sure how you know that.
but I believe if we share our science thoughts we can find answers to both science and reality .
You don't have "science thoughts": making up crap (which you do do) isn't science.
Perhaps , unluckily for them , they'd developed a new form of math and nobody noticed.
They (you) haven't. Although you have claimed that very thing more than once.
I can't really comment without reading the whole thread.
Given that "James Blunt" is a known alias of yourself then you're being somewhat disingenuous at the very least and wilfully dishonest at worst.
It can be very difficult at times to understand people
Yeah, I have trouble understanding why someone persists in using sock puppets after being banned from so many fora. Especially when they repeatedly claim that they're going to stop posting.
 
The problem is that you don't learn. Ergo: you may "keep trying" but you'll also keep failing.

Since your grasp of either/ both is, at best, exceedingly tenuous, I'm not sure how you know that.

You don't have "science thoughts": making up crap (which you do do) isn't science.

They (you) haven't. Although you have claimed that very thing more than once.

Given that "James Blunt" is a known alias of yourself then you're being somewhat disingenuous at the very least and wilfully dishonest at worst.

Yeah, I have trouble understanding why someone persists in using sock puppets after being banned from so many fora. Especially when they repeatedly claim that they're going to stop posting.
Nothing in your post addresses any of the science I've posted.
A science forum isn't the Jeremy Kyle show , it suppose to be for discussing science , something you have not done in two posts .

What is reality ?

Is it reality that the object I see in my mind also exists independent of my mind ?

Of course

Is your reality any different ?
 
Nothing in your post addresses any of the science I've posted
Your delusion is speaking again: you haven't posted any science.
A science forum isn't the Jeremy Kyle show , it suppose to be for discussing science , something you have not done in two posts.
It's also something you've not done in any of your posts, here or on on other fora.
What is reality ?
Is it reality that the object I see in my mind also exists independent of my mind ?
Of course
Given that, in post #3 you stated that you find reality is lies after more lies then obviously that's not the actual case.
 
Your delusion is speaking again: you haven't posted any science.

It's also something you've not done in any of your posts, here or on on other fora.

Given that, in post #3 you stated that you find reality is lies after more lies then obviously that's not the actual case.
I've not posted any science ?

I've explained gravity and how the propagation of light works in this thread already . Have you read the entire thread or are you just nit picking ?
 
I've not posted any science ?
No.
I've explained gravity and how the propagation of light works in this thread already .
Not true. You may have claimed to have explained them, but, in actual fact, your made up crap isn't science. It is, as is usual (I hesitate to use the word "normal" with reference to you) with you to post inane unsubstantiated unscientific drivel in the erroneous and delusional belief (strictly on your part) that it does constitute science. Despite the fact that in all the years you've been posting under various pseudonyms on numerous fora you've amply demonstrated that you don't know science and you've shown yourself to be incapable of learning any.
Have you read the entire thread or are you just nit picking ?
Read it all.
And I'm still waiting for your response to my post #66.

Oh, and so far you haven't posted any philosophy either (despite the thread being in that sub-forum).
 
Absolutely not.

No you have given us a heap of unsubstantiated rhetorical nonsense.
I try all the time to explain everything in simple terms . If you can't understand the simple version how do you ever hope to understand the more complex version ?

I'll say it again to end this mindless talk ,

Fire points up , ask yourself why ....
 
All you are doing, is continuing to act the fool.

Perhaps because hot air rises?:rolleyes:
I don't think fire is just hot air.

I don't act a fool , I'm a genuine fool .

Light propagates at c , the lights motion is because the lights natural mechanism is to expand into lesser energy space .

Thermodynamics and spectral emissions demonstrate this , it is not made up nonsense .

Momentum p of y photon is proportional to the force F of the lesser energy state surrounding space .

Do you think this is incorrect ?
 
II don't act a fool , I'm a genuine fool
At last. Something we agree on.
Light propagates at c , the lights motion is because the lights natural mechanism is to expand into lesser energy space .
Thermodynamics and spectral emissions demonstrate this , it is not made up nonsense .
Momentum p of y photon is proportional to the force F of the lesser energy state surrounding space .
Do you think this is incorrect ?
Not only incorrect but nonsense.
 
Belief is the fire at the center of the universe (all things), the ultimate catylyst to life and and time.
 
Belief is the fire at the center of the universe (all things), the ultimate catylyst to life and and time.
1) Belief isn't a fire.
2) There is no centre to the universe.
3) Fire isn't a "catalyst to life" (generally) nor is belief.
4) Fire isn't any sort of "catalyst" to time nor is belief.
 
1) Belief isn't a fire.
2) There is no centre to the universe.
3) Fire isn't a "catalyst to life" (generally) nor is belief.
4) Fire isn't any sort of "catalyst" to time nor is belief.

If you believe life it's a holy and eternal thing. Belief is the foundation of nature.
 
Back
Top