Krash may just have other motives since the argument is null.
again, the argument is simply " if the public is unsure of the reality, then the reality must not exist," and "that is not evidence because I(insignificant individuals of the public only) say it is not. "-- which is only, simply, based on "belief" and NOTHING MORE.Krash may just have other motives since the argument is null.
But you have nothing other than a crazy deep seated belief that we have been visited.ahh--more of the female teenager mentality nonsense that is inaccurate-- comical--is this all pad?
anything on my questions that you have conveniently side-stepped that does not involve your pathetic manipulation spin?
I see Carl as probably one of the greatest educators of our time, and have his original [now somewhat dated] Cosmos series.Just quoting Carl Sagan and doing a little compare and contrast. And mentioning argument from ignorance as a logical fallacy, nullifies your argument.
is this all pad? anything on my questions that you have conveniently side-stepped that does not involve your pathetic manipulation spin?But you have nothing other than a crazy deep seated belief that we have been visited.
While certainly some evidence of strange unexplained happenings, that does not equate to Alien visitations.
So keep plastering your nonsense for all you are worth...It in reality changes nothing, and I'm sure deep down you already know that.
except you have done no such thing. the only thing you have implemented is an abundance of ditzy-ness and low level minded shenanigans. (shrugs)Just quoting Carl Sagan and doing a little compare and contrast. And mentioning argument from ignorance as a logical fallacy, nullifies your argument.
Nope.except you have done no such thing. the only thing you have implemented is an abundance of ditzy-ness and low level minded shenanigans. (shrugs)
LIM-- now we are right back to the question of " according to whom ? "--you ?-- this is comedy gold right here that one can charge for.Nope.
It means your argument is really a poor one.
I'm not the one spamming.LIM-- now we are right back to the question of " according to whom ? "--you ?-- this is comedy gold right here that one can charge for.
(shakes head)-- is this all?
so what are you doing besides initiating pathetic shenanigans?I'm not the one spamming.
A totally ignorant statement: The Public is in the first instant "unsure" But as scientific methodology and reasoning is raised, and questions asked like, "Why with all these thousands and thousands of sightings, they are always flittering in then flittering out again, never making their visitations official" or "why have they never left anything really physical behind that can only be construed as extra terrestrial."again, the argument is simply " if the public is unsure of the reality, then the reality must not exist,"
Wrong again, the issues that have lead to the official conclusion that we have no conclusive evidence of any Alien visitations, is dictated by logic, common sense reasoning, and the scientific method which entails those.and "that is not evidence because I(insignificant individuals of the public only) say it is not. "-- which is only, simply, based on "belief" and NOTHING MORE.(shakes head)
I'll leave him to you, as I have some science articles to check out.Krash may just have other motives since the argument is null.
I'm not.so what are you doing besides initiating pathetic shenanigans?
Too late!I'll leave him to you, as I have some science articles to check out.![]()
please show this to be true--simple correct?A totally ignorant statement:
again, according to whom?--whom or what is the deciding factor for reality?"Why with all these thousands and thousands of sightings, they are always flittering in then flittering out again, never making their visitations official" or "why have they never left anything really physical behind that can only be construed as extra terrestrial."