I'm the Queen of Mesopotamia.again, i am the one with the access. (shrugs) the funny aspect of your ending reply, that is comical, is that simply, i have implyed this to you befor hand. (shrugs.
I'm the Queen of Mesopotamia.again, i am the one with the access. (shrugs) the funny aspect of your ending reply, that is comical, is that simply, i have implyed this to you befor hand. (shrugs.
so you continue with the pathetic shenanigans?--why is that?I'm the Queen of Mesopotamia.
Congrats on being the first person (besides advertisements) that I've reported.so you continue with the pathetic shenanigans?--why is that?
so you continue with the pathetic shenanigans?--why is that?Congrats on being the first person (besides advertisements) that I've reported.
what is the significance of your pathetic diversions to the topic(simply because YOU CANNOT answer any realistic questions, due to your, obvious, female teenager mentality)? and also why do you believe that the show X-files is fictitious?
comical-- Pad, is this all?
You seem obsessed with teenage females...Not really healthy I suggest.due to your, obvious, female teenager mentality)?
And you believe otherwise?and also why do you believe that the show X-files is fictitious?
comical-- Pad, is this all?--nothing more than low-level minded, female teenager shenanigans simply because YOU CANNOT answer any realistic questions?You seem obsessed with teenage females...Not really healthy I suggest.
And you believe otherwise?
Well if you havn't convicted yourself before this, you certainly have now!
I cannot readily demonstrate a negative. You say you have provided an answer. Please tell me the post number, or numbers of where this answer has been provided. This would have been the simple, direct and helpful way of addressing my request. In failing to respond in that manner you have already breached the guidelines I established for you. I shall give you one further chance to respond correctly. Either provide the answer again, or give the number(s) of the post(s) in which you previously did so.please show how i have not--- simple.
do you not comprehend what i have been quoting from others?-- it appears as an "obviously not."
again, the argument is simply " if the public is unsure of the reality, then the reality must not exist," and "that is not evidence because I(insignificant individuals of the public only) say it is not. "-- which is only, simply, based on "belief" and NOTHING MORE. (shakes head)
Krash is permanently banned.Agreed
Your sarcasm is understood ; by me .