We never went to the moon.

Status
Not open for further replies.
paddoboy said:
Am I calling you a liar? Yes I am. Because no one no matter how stupid, could genuinely misinterpret what you have and what other like-minded nuts have.

Absolutely. The guy is shamelessly a big fraud. He has a scripted response. When he gets cornered he respams, goes quiet and comes back with diversionary crap.

I am posting this until the coward responds properly -

Four of the five quick questions for you to cowardly avoid:

1. How can a flag swing around in water without severe restriction? Even really slowly there is enormous drag!
2. If you setup a current in a pool from these bogus wave blowers, that force doesn't suddenly disappear, it just keeps swirling stuff all over the place. How come your bullcrap wave blowers don't make the astronauts move about?
3. Will you individually identify which pieces of this you regard as proof? We'll take it as read that the cables are on that list, but what else doesn't that blog link answer?
4. The man who made your video says 911 wasn't an inside job and says Apollo wasn't hoaxed. Your bullcrap claim says he was got at! That is ridiculous as he has never even mentioned any of those subject. Yet people like Aulis, Jarrah White, YOU! aren't made an offer you can't refuse. Explain this.

You have no credibility. You are saying that if you twiddle an open piece of fabric slow enough in water, it will show no signs of drag? Is that what you are moronically claiming?

Anyone can trot by a cloth, why don't you stick your cloth in a swimming pool and try it you hopeless fraud. The fabric will show drag, especially twiddled around on a stick.

This is how people can see you are a fraud. You claim to be a truther, but nobody is that stupid not to now how a flag would behave in water. Even you.
 
I just ran across this and read the first few pages. How this thread managed to run 10 pages before he was banned is a mystery to me.
He was obviously a lunatic, to turn a phrase..
 
I just ran across this and read the first few pages. How this thread managed to run 10 pages before he was banned is a mystery to me.
He was obviously a lunatic, to turn a phrase..

He was banned way before it reached page 10. Unfortunately FatFreddy decided to keep the lunacy going.
 
He was banned way before it reached page 10. Unfortunately FatFreddy decided to keep the lunacy going.

Fat Freddy is having a laugh, obviously, at winding up everyone who responds to this silly thread. This is what trolls like to do of course.

Sometimes scientifically minded people make the error of assuming good faith on the part of others that is just not there.
 
The proof that the moon missions were faked is crushing.

Plan C for the troll when cornered. First he ignores, then diverts finally just resorts to spamming his links again, fully expecting to get banned so he can proclaim troofer victory.

Now you useless coward, those questions you keep avoiding. Help us all see the troof:

1. How can a flag swing around in water without severe restriction? Even really slowly there is enormous drag!
2. If you setup a current in a pool from these bogus wave blowers, that force doesn't suddenly disappear, it just keeps swirling stuff all over the place. How come your bullcrap wave blowers don't make the astronauts move about?
3. Will you individually identify which pieces of this you regard as proof? We'll take it as read that the cables are on that list, but what else doesn't that blog link answer?
4. The man who made your video says 911 wasn't an inside job and says Apollo wasn't hoaxed. Your bullcrap claim says he was got at! That is ridiculous as he has never even mentioned any of those subject. Yet people like Aulis, Jarrah White, YOU! aren't made an offer you can't refuse. Explain this.

You have no credibility. You are saying that if you twiddle an open piece of fabric slow enough in water, it will show no signs of drag? Is that what you are moronically claiming?

Anyone can trot by a cloth, why don't you stick your cloth in a swimming pool and try it you hopeless fraud. The fabric will show drag, especially twiddled around on a stick.

This is how people can see you are a fraud. You claim to be a truther, but nobody is that stupid not to now how a flag would behave in water. Even you.
 
Now you useless coward, those questions you keep avoiding. Help us all see the troof:
The only thing that matters is what the viewers end up thinking and they've already seen the clearest anomalies of the Chinese spacewalk.
http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=362999&page=2&p=1064028979#post1064028979

The bubble, the fluttering flag, and the buoyant safety cables have already proven that it was faked. You chose something that is easier to obfuscate to try to draw attention away from the clearer anomalies.

The flag in this clip looks like it's made of a sheet of rubber so it's movement is consistent with a much slower speed.
(1:55 time mark)

If you setup a current in a pool from these bogus wave blowers, that force doesn't suddenly disappear, it just keeps swirling stuff all over the place. How come your bullcrap wave blowers don't make the astronauts move about?

It looks to me like the astronauts are always holding on to something. You've got nothing here.

Will you individually identify which pieces of this you regard as proof? We'll take it as read that the cables are on that list, but what else doesn't that blog link answer?
I already did. Look at the link I posted.

The man who made your video says 911 wasn't an inside job and says Apollo wasn't hoaxed. Your bullcrap claim says he was got at! That is ridiculous as he has never even mentioned any of those subject. Yet people like Aulis, Jarrah White, YOU! aren't made an offer you can't refuse. Explain this.
I said it was plausible that he was got at and it's quite plausible that he was threatened and the others weren't. Anyway, our not knowing why he said those things doesn't make the anomalies disappear. You've got nothing here.

You are saying that if you twiddle an open piece of fabric slow enough in water, it will show no signs of drag? Is that what you are moronically claiming?
It looks more like a sheet of rubber than a piece of fabric. If it's a sheet of rubber, the behavior is consistent with its slow movement in water.


There's nothing difficult about those questions you've been asking. You're asking them and avoiding the more obvious anomalies because you're checkmated by the obvious anomalies.
 
The only thing that matters is what the viewers end up thinking and they've already seen the clearest anomalies of the Chinese spacewalk.
http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=362999&page=2&p=1064028979#post1064028979

In that case you're busted because nobody ever buys into your useless observations.

The bubble, the fluttering flag, and the buoyant safety cables have already proven that it was faked. You chose something that is easier to obfuscate to try to draw attention away from the clearer anomalies.

It isn't a bubble and you are a comedy truther. It is almost certainly a piece of condensation turned to ice in vacuum. You have been shown videos of this slowed down where it actually rotates and looks misshapen. You are pathetic for insisting this is still a bubble.


The flag in this clip looks like it's made of a sheet of rubber so it's movement is consistent with a much slower speed.

This is like arguing with a simpleton. Any flat surface with any degree of flexibility will billow. So no it's a rubber flag that spins unrestricted at some painfully slow speed, whilst everything else is going normal speed? You would get laughed out of the debating hall for acting like the Black Knight. You have no credibility.

It looks to me like the astronauts are always holding on to something. You've got nothing here.

A moronic observation. Their legs remain motionless, but with any degree of current would move the whole time.

Show me some evidence for wave blowers? Got none?

I already did. Look at the link I posted.

Liar. The link only refers to cables. Post a list that the blog doesn't debunk. He listed 21 points and dismantled them all.

I said it was plausible that he was got at and it's quite plausible that he was threatened and the others weren't. Anyway, our not knowing why he said those things doesn't make the anomalies disappear. You've got nothing here.

It isn't plausible at all. Your credibility test backfires on you. He said Apollo wasn't a hoax and he is quite correct.

It looks more like a sheet of rubber than a piece of fabric. If it's a sheet of rubber, the behavior is consistent with its slow movement in water.

It looks nothing like a sheet of rubber and rubber does not behave that way in water either.

There's nothing difficult about those questions you've been asking. You're asking them and avoiding the more obvious anomalies because you're checkmated by the obvious anomalies.

There are no obvious anomalies. Your answers are pathetic obfuscation. The cable is shape memory.
 
Here's a debate I had with this guy.
http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=211182&page=11&p=4757574#post4757574

I say he showed himself to be a sophist by saying lame things. People can click on all the hot links and read the whole thing and decide for themselves.

I say you are a cowardly forum troll who lies. I say you don't believe your own arguments and have some vested financial interest in all of this, hence the need to spam a hundred forums with the same never changing junk, loaded with dead links and crappy debunked rubbish. I say he owned you with his posts and his videos.


Post a list that the blog doesn't debunk. He listed 21 points and dismantled them all.

And try to get back on topic, itemise your best Apollo evidence.


I cannot understand how you can possibly think your uninformed opinion means anything. You say everything is plausible when it is quite ridiculously not.
 
At which point did "we" become China? If they want to engage in fasle propaganda of their scientific prowess, they can have at it.

But did we not see the rocket launches and the immaculate tracking by very sophisticated instruments. Did we not land Rover on the moon? Did Voyager not take the pictures in exquisite detail of Jupiter and its moons?
Did we not bring back samples of moon rocks?
Did we not see the tragic failures which cost the lives of several astronauts.

WE (the US) DID go to the moon and today many other projects are cooperative efforts with other countries.
Is that all just make-believe? Give it a break man, you are not talking to 8 year olds who will believe anything you tell them.

Why not be proud of those astounding accomplishments? Or is this just a case of a paranoid mind inventing some grand conspiracy when there is a rock on the road, imagining someone is trying to kill you?

You are the perfect example of a dangerously deranged mind, who might just buy a gun and kill all the tens of thousands of liars who conspired to fool you and everyone else. Let me rephrase "everyone is out to fool only you and someday you will take your revenge against everyone who was involved"

Has the thought crossed your mind? I think it has..
 
Why don't any scientists agree with you?

Trigger alert - spambot has been notified. That will elicit one of his moronic cut and paste responses where all scientists are corrupt(able) and all afraid to talk lest they lose their jobs. It starts with some random woman talking about nuclear fuel or some such nonsense. Just wait, it is coming any post now.
 
Trigger alert - spambot has been notified. That will elicit one of his moronic cut and paste responses where all scientists are corrupt(able) and all afraid to talk lest they lose their jobs. It starts with some random woman talking about nuclear fuel or some such nonsense. Just wait, it is coming any post now.


You'll find most of our alternative/conspiracy nuts using that one. :rolleyes:
I mean with all this conspiracy stuff, it's a wonder they're game enough to get out of bed in the morning!
 
Trigger alert - spambot has been notified. That will elicit one of his moronic cut and paste responses where all scientists are corrupt(able) and all afraid to talk lest they lose their jobs. It starts with some random woman talking about nuclear fuel or some such nonsense. Just wait, it is coming any post now.
It's beyond credulity that all of them would be so coerced for so long. Hell, even the Manhattan Project had leaks.
 
I got banned from the Clavius forum years ago. I snuck back in yesterday and did some posting. They knew it was me right away but I was able to do some serious posting before I got banned again and they didn't delete the stuff I posted. Here it is. I used the username "Scott".

http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1147.0
http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1145.0
http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1146.0
http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1149.0

http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=993.15
(reply #21)

http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1118.15
(reply #18)

Read that last one until post #26. Jay Windley* destroyed his credibility again. Another pro-Apollo poster agreed with him in post #37. They also maintained that the Chinese spacewalk was real and tried to obfuscate those clear anomalies (see the fourth link). Those people are a joke.




*
http://www.clavius.org/about.html
 
Maybe you're the joke.

Are you a flat-earther too? Do you believe the crap you spew, or are you just a troll? You sure as hell have no scientific rigor.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top