Then you have swung so hard as to strike yourself on the head.
Can't be located by humans obviously. A typical property one expects of higher realms, or whatever other label suits.
So suggest a plausible physics allowing conscious beings in said higher dimensions. Good luck.
I have been. Your banal tautology explains nothing and ignores everything I have been at pains to explain. But some people just like to come across as 'smart'.
Nope.
And yet you yourself claim "the higher power(s) is/are not material as we understand the term". So go ahead, give this "plausible physics".
Quite.
The difference between you and the rest of the ideologically committed materialists here, and the likes of me, is that I accept the voluminous credibly witnessed evidence for paranormal phenomena of various kinds, whereas your hard materialism requires rejecting such evidence out of hand. A fundamental conceptual divide. Why nearly everything here just goes round in circles.
It's weird, isn't it?
'rant', 'gullibility'...the expected bating pejoratives. You miss the point. There is no need to hypothesize an unknown and likely unknowable (by humans) 'higher realm physics'. All that one needs to know is that intelligently directed/controlled phenomena exists that has no explanation via conventional physics. And there's plenty of such evidence on offer. Invariably trivialized, ridiculed, distorted, and all-round rejected by your materialist brigade - as a matter of ideological principle.
Um, isn't that essentially what you've done? (Minus any details, of course).
And then you wonder why people see the likes of you, as gullible?
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence:
How could you, or anybody else, possibly hope to establish that claim?
What evidence is there of "phenomena that have no explanation via conventional physics"?
Forget ideology. It's a simple matter of critical thinking.
Including you, and what passes for your 'critical thinking'. Which in practice is heavily laced with snide pejoratives designed to provoke an angry response. You are not genuine imo.
This is why I cannot take you as genuine. We have gone over this topic now for 224 pages, with innumerable genuinely unexplained multi-witnessed cases posted. Always your lot trivialize, distort, and dismiss for no good reason. You simply don't want to admit there is more to the world than the material one subject to lab observation/testing. Non-material intelligences that refuse to play ball because they have their own unknown to us agenda, is something you can't handle. You can't handle that possibility when concocting your 'show us the evidence' worn out lines.
Ahh yeah, MR was prone to rant on about that made up unknown excuse among all the other excuses.
No. As I explained in earlier post, you lot simply refuse to acknowledge the plentiful 'extraordinary evidence' accumulated over many decades. For outright prejudiced ideological committment reasons. Or worse, because you are nasty and impudent by nature. And that last option imo describes you to a 'T'.
Well, there you go, Q-reeus. river supports you.
But...but...you don't! Gawd...isn't that all that matters?
And yet, even you aren't convinced.
Why Q-reeus, if I didn't know better it almost sounds like you have a sense of humour of this.
