DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
He didn't. We've been over this. << (click this link to read the conversation you had recently about mailbots)James R why did you initiate , by e-mail , for at least 10months , for me to come back .
It's kind of telling that you've forgotten already.
If by "mainstream" and "authoritarian" you mean "we retain in all areas of debate an ethos of respect for the scientific method, which demands critical analysis, clear thinking and evidence-based argument." then sure.This site is mainstream thinking to the of being point of science being authoritarian based . That is not good for science .
That is, after all, the ethos you agreed to when you signed up.
I have yet to see you actually defend any of the wild things you've claimed. You just shout them out, over and over.
River: "2+2=5!"
Everyone else: "Actually, it equals 4, and here is the proof."
River: "No! 2+2=5!"
Everyone else: "Defend your claim."
River: "2+2=5!"
This is not how intelligent discussion works.
Last edited: