UFOs (UAPs): Explanations?

"In 1948 astronomer Hynek, then director of Ohio State University’s McMillin Observatory, agreed to help the U.S. Air Force investigate reports of unexplained aircraft sightings, including one that described the lightning-fast "flying saucers" above the Cascade Mountains in Washington.

As the astronomical consultant on "Project Sign," Hynek combed through the reports and sorted them into categories: There were those which were simply astronomical observations, like the appearance of a meteor, those explained by meteorology, like an unusually shaped cloud, and those which captured accounts of man-made objects, like balloons. That left about 20 percent with no clear explanation, though Hynek felt that answers would eventually surface and returned to Ohio State.

By 1952, with reports continuing to trickle in, the Air Force had rekindled the operation as "Project Blue Book." Hynek was also back in the fold and now granted the license to investigate the alleged sightings in the field. While he had harbored plenty of skepticism the first time around, he found his assumptions challenged by the rational recollections of witnesses, and began thinking about the legitimate scientific study of these "Unidentified Flying Objects" or "UFOs."

By the 1960s, Hynek had moved on as the chair of the Department of Astronomy at Northwestern University and was at odds with the stifling oversight of the Air Force. With the arrival of new intriguing cases, like a reported sighting of alien beings by New Mexico police officer Lonnie Zamora in 1964, Hynek began conferring with other curious Northwestern faculty members in what he called his "invisible college."

In March 1966, Hynek was dispatched to investigate reports of unusual lights in separate areas of Michigan over successive nights. Rushed to conduct his findings amid a horde of reporters, the scientist soon announced that the sightings were possibly the result of "swamp gas."

The term became a national joke, but Michigan Congressman and House Minority Leader Gerald Ford wasn't laughing and demanded the Armed Services Committee pick up what he felt was a shoddy investigation. Called to testify, Hynek used the occasion to argue for an extensive, transparent study of UFOs, marking his first public break from the Air Force.

With the formation later that year of the University of Colorado's "Condon Committee," named for director and physicist Edward Condon, Hynek was thrilled that UFO research had finally risen to a level of national importance. However, he was disappointed when the committee concluded two years of study with the report that there was no need to expend further resources on the subject. In 1969, Project Blue Book was formally shuttered for good."--- https://www.biography.com/scientists/j-allen-hynek
 
The Robert Taylor ufo encounter in Scotland in 1979. Very strange even for a conventional ufo.



"When he came to, the clearing was empty, apart from a pattern of deep regular marks on the ground. He went to his van but was so shaken he drove it into a ditch and had to stagger home in "a dazed condition".

When he got to his house he told his wife Mary he had been attacked by a "spaceship thing". Because Mr Taylor was in such a state, the police were called and officers found themselves inquiring into an assault on a forester by alien beings.
Det Con Ian Wark, the scene of crime investigator, arrived at the clearing to find a large gathering of police officers were already there.

He told the BBC he saw strange marks on the ground. There were about 32 holes, which were about 3.5 inches in diameter, as well as marks similar to those made by the type of caterpillar tracks often fitted on bulldozers."

"....Mr Robinson, who has given lectures on the incident across the UK, Holland, France and the USA and written a book on the subject, said it was one of the most incredible cases in the world. He said it was one of very few hardcore cases that defied any explanation.

There are many theories about what actually happened to Mr Taylor. These include everything from hallucinatory berries to blackball lightning and a mirage of the planet Venus."
 
Last edited:
Aircraft, such as helicopters, have strobing anti-collision lights. These are especially useful in a fog bank, when low-flying craft are otherwise visually obscured.

The pattern is not standardized; it can vary by manufacturer, by model, it can even be set according the pilot's preferences depending on conditions.

CpmLY.png


Special note to MR: aircraft are on the list of objects that - when they move behind other objects - still exist.
 
Last edited:
Aircraft, such as helicopters, have strobing anti-collision lights. These are especially useful in a fog bank, when low-flying craft are otherwise visually obscured.


Guess they forgot to turn on the red and green position lights...

 
Last edited:
Guess they forgot to turn on the red and green position lights...
The red/green lights are much dimmer than the anti-collision strobes. It is entirely likely they would not be visible in the fog.
The anti-collisions are for this very purpose, which is why they're so much brighter and also why they don't leave them on in normal (clear) conditions.

"Of all the different types of lights on airplanes, strobe anti-collision are the brightest. "

"Because high-intensity strobes could cause spatial disorientation in certain circumstances, the FAA gives the pilot discretion to turn off anticollision lights when it’s in the interest of safety..."
https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media...ining-magazine/what-am-i-anticollision-lights
 
Last edited:
The red/green lights are much dimmer than the anti-collision strobes.

No...there is no fog covering the craft. We can see two horizontal white lights clearly. So if it were a helicopter we'd be seeing the red and green lights too. Definitely not a helicopter, as if a helicopter would just stand still hovering near a cloud.

"Because high-intensity strobes could cause spatial disorientation in certain circumstances, the FAA gives the pilot discretion to turn off anticollision lights when it’s in the interest of safety..."

But not the red and green position lights, which must be on all the time at night.
 
No...there is no fog covering the craft. We can see two horizontal white lights clearly.
Yes. You see lights which shine through fog.

You once again make stamtent you can't possibly defend, such as "there is no fog covering the craft."


So if it were a helicopter we'd be seeing the red and green lights too.
No, they're dimmer.
We are seeing three very bright lights and that's all. Therefore, the fog is thick enogh to be obscuring everything except the three brightest lights.

Definitely not a helicopter, as if a helicopter would just stand still hovering near a cloud.
Now we know you're trolling.
 
What you saw didn't fit, so you didn't see it. Psych 114.
No. He knows. You know he's funning with us when he crosses the line like this:

Definitely not a helicopter, as if a helicopter would just stand still hovering near a cloud.

Right, because nobody uses helicopters to hover ... ;)



Regardless of what it actually is, it is entirely consistent with a helicopter hovering (for example, a traffic or police helicopter), with its anti-collision strobes on - as it would in a cloud bank or fog. There's nothing interesting here to anyone who has ever lived in a city.
 
Back
Top