UFOs (UAPs): Explanations?

James R said:
Gee. It's like you've just forgotten everything we discussed previously in regards to this.

You don't remember the stuff about gimbal cameras and apparent rotation?

Or is this just you trolling, trying to make me repeat stuff because you're pretending you can't remember?
Click to expand...
Rhetorical? :D
 
You don't remember the stuff about gimbal cameras and apparent rotation?
Click to expand...

Stuff? You mean that bullshit some guy on Youtube made up about that Navy video and those dumb pilots? How could I forget it?:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Magical Realist said:
Stuff? You mean that bullshit some guy on Youtube made up about that Navy video and those dumb pilots? How could I forget it?:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Wait. MR doesn't believe something he saw online?

Oh. Right. That's just MR picking and choosing what sources support his beliefs.

MR, this is the kind of thing that stands above others criticizing you. When you contradict yourself with such hypocrisy, you shoot yourself in the foot, without any help from anyone else.

Also: stating beliefs that are demonstrably false.

Well done on two counts.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Wait. MR doesn't believe something he saw online?

Oh. Right. That's just MR picking and choosing what sources support his beliefs.

MR, this is the kind of thing that stands above others criticizing you. When you contradict yourself with such hypocrisy, you shoot yourself in the foot, without any help from anyone else.

Also: stating beliefs that are demonstrably false.

Well done on two counts.
Click to expand...

You're the ones always bitching about my Youtube sources. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of relying on them yourselves when it suits your argument.
 
Magical Realist said:
Stuff? You mean that bullshit some guy on Youtube made up about that Navy video and those dumb pilots? How could I forget it?:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Is it your claim that the gimbal IR cameras on the fighter jets cannot produce the kind of apparent rotation seen in the video?
 
How do you know it wasn't?
Click to expand...

Because the pilots would be aware of it. Instead they are reacting to the rotating object in amazement as a ufo. You can hear their exclamations on audio. The Navy even comes out later and confirms it was a ufo. No mention of that "apparent motion of the gimbal" bullshit from your youtuber,
 
Last edited:
Magical Realist said:
Because the pilots would be aware of it.
Click to expand...
In other words, you're just making an unevidenced assumption, like I said. Okay.

Instead they are reacting to the rotating object in amazement as a ufo. You can hear their exclamations on audio. The Navy even comes out later and confirms it was a ufo. No mention of that "apparent motion of the gimbal" bullshit from your youtuber,
Click to expand...
The apparent rotation was only explained later, by a clever person, as you know.
 
The apparent rotation was only explained later, by a clever person, as you know.
Click to expand...

No..the Navy came out and confirmed it was a ufo, or uap, after all your skeptical cohorts posted their bullshit explanations online. Apparently the U.S. Navy knows a little more about these mysterious objects than your modern day skeptic brigade does.

 
Last edited:
Magical Realist said:
No..the Navy came out and confirmed it was a ufo, or uap, after all your skeptical cohorts posted their bullshit explanations online.
Click to expand...
They knew it was UFO from the start. UFO means "unidentified flying object", as you know.

What was the Navy's comment on the gimbal explanation and associated hypothesis. If they were aware of the explanation given by the skeptics, what did they have to say about it? Where can I read the official report?

Apparently the U.S. Navy knows a little more about these mysterious objects than your modern day skeptic brigade does.
Click to expand...
I thought they said it was a "UAP". That means they don't know what it is. Right?
 
What was the Navy's comment on the gimbal explanation and associated hypothesis.
Click to expand...

No comment was made on all the bullshit explanations out there because they're bullshit. They assume multiple errors and pilot blunders that only make the Navy look bad. Such was not the case, as proven by corroborating evidence on multiple systems.

I thought they said it was a "UAP". That means they don't know what it is. Right?
Click to expand...

That's the new name for these mysterious objects now, not mistaken jets seen from the rear or whales or flocks of seagulls.:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top