UFOs (UAPs): Explanations?

nail...hit...head!
:D Hi dmoe old mate!! Not doing too well over at SFN I see. :p Better luck on your next escapade! :D
So old mate, tell me which of the publications mentioned are not as I have described them...you know, sensationilistic bullshit to put it bluntly....Or is your objection to the fairy tale books that I listed? Yeah, I did forget, you dismiss the BB. So tell me, what is it about the BB that you find invalid? And what hypothetical do you submit in its place? Or do you find anything compelling re the Bermuda Triangle? Perhaps you need to do some research then. Or are you in support of the childish like nonsense advocated by river and Branderburg re an atomic war on Mars between alien species? C'mon dmoe, old mate, come out of the closet and express your real feelings!!!
 
Some years ago I heard they had found those 4 jets that had gone missing

Can't recall full details but think on ocean floor in formation

:)
Actually the book was a good read, and illustrated perfectly how some are able to manipulate certain scenarios to reflect whatever they like, mostly through, lack of scientific knowledge and evidence, filling in the blank spaces with inuendo, imagination and rumour, and total unbelievable exaggeration.
 
Actually the book was a good read, and illustrated perfectly how some are able to manipulate certain scenarios to reflect whatever they like, mostly through, lack of scientific knowledge and evidence, filling in the blank spaces with inuendo, imagination and rumour, and total unbelievable exaggeration.

Okay . What " scientific knowledge " did they lack ?

Explain further .
 
Last edited:
:D Hi dmoe old mate!! Not doing too well over at SFN I see. :p Better luck on your next escapade! :D
So old mate, tell me which of the publications mentioned are not as I have described them...you know, sensationilistic bullshit to put it bluntly....Or is your objection to the fairy tale books that I listed? Yeah, I did forget, you dismiss the BB. So tell me, what is it about the BB that you find invalid? And what hypothetical do you submit in its place? Or do you find anything compelling re the Bermuda Triangle? Perhaps you need to do some research then. Or are you in support of the childish like nonsense advocated by river and Branderburg re an atomic war on Mars between alien species? C'mon dmoe, old mate, come out of the closet and express your real feelings!!!
Multiple off-topic incitements, intended to derail and create discord. But no point reporting you - admin loves your bating-flaming-trolling 'contributions' here.
Anyway, given you dismiss all of those books listed in #2614 as "sensationilistic bullshit to put it bluntly", to responsibly make that judgement, you have read them all? Even one? My guess - not even one.
 
Sure he does! His dreams, his overactive imagination, his dismissal of real science in favour of fairy tales and the mysterious.
Getting a bit unhinged - or did you not realize logically that line refers back not to river but to the sourpuss ex-seadog? Oops!
 
Getting a bit unhinged - or did you not realize logically that line refers back not to river but to the sourpuss ex-seadog? Oops!
No old buddy...the old sea dog made the remark first. Nice to see you back though, even if only here!
Multiple off-topic incitements, intended to derail and create discord. But no point reporting you - admin loves your bating-flaming-trolling 'contributions' here.
Anyway, given you dismiss all of those books listed in #2614 as "sensationilistic bullshit to put it bluntly", to responsibly make that judgement, you have read them all? Even one? My guess - not even one.
Am I? So you as usual then indulge in your by now well known conspiracy nonsense, just as you were banned for over at SFN. :D
And as usual your guess or should I say enforced biased remark is way off target.
Anyway nice to see the old gathering of river, dmoe, MR and yourself...makes for quite a laugh!:D
 
No old buddy...the old sea dog made the remark first. Nice to see you back though, even if only here!

Am I? So you as usual then indulge in your by now well known conspiracy nonsense, just as you were banned for over at SFN. :D
And as usual your guess or should I say enforced biased remark is way off target.
Anyway nice to see the old gathering of river, dmoe, MR and yourself...makes for quite a laugh!:D

pad is pad .
 
No old buddy...the old sea dog made the remark first.
Still failing to recognize, or just too vain to admit, the glaring gaffe back there. Figures.
Nice to see you back though, even if only here!
I can't honestly reciprocate.
Am I? So you as usual then indulge in your by now well known conspiracy nonsense, just as you were banned for over at SFN. :D
You lie. I never indulged in any 'conspiracy theories' at SFN - period! But truth is no impediment to your penchant for distortions ad nauseam.
And as usual your guess or should I say enforced biased remark is way off target.
Anyway nice to see the old gathering of river, dmoe, MR and yourself...makes for quite a laugh!:D
Will take that as admission I was right - you read not a single book listed in #2614 before dismissing all as "sensationilistic bullshit" (direct quote - hence your spelling error not corrected).
 
Still failing to recognize, or just too vain to admit, the glaring gaffe back there. Figures.
I leave both the being vain and the gaffes to you. Again that wise old sea dog made the remark.
I can't honestly reciprocate.
And I was partaking in humour :p
You lie. I never indulged in any 'conspiracy theories' at SFN - period! But truth is no impediment to your penchant for distortions ad nauseam..
No, I don't lie and it is there for all to see. Again just as you have done here, you indulge in conspiracy nonsense.
Will take that as admission I was right - you read not a single book listed in #2614 before dismissing all as "sensationilistic bullshit" (direct quote - hence your spelling error not corrected).
Take it as you like :rolleyes:....What you believe, and what conspiracies you indulge in, and what fairy tales you believe in, does not affect me, either in the short or long term. But yes, again, a nice gathering! :p
 
I leave both the being vain and the gaffes to you. Again that wise old sea dog made the remark.

And I was partaking in humour :p

No, I don't lie and it is there for all to see. Again just as you have done here, you indulge in conspiracy nonsense.

Take it as you like :rolleyes:....What you believe, and what conspiracies you indulge in, and what fairy tales you believe in, does not affect me, either in the short or long term. But yes, again, a nice gathering! :p
And the 'best' part - none of your continued lying, trolling, deflecting, derailing attempts etc, will receive the slightest forum admin/mod reprimand. Charmed life. Such is SF. Bye.
 
OK, back on topic, while certainly UFO's are real, with the emphasis on unidentified, the facts are that as yet we have no extraordinary scientific evidence to support any life in the universe, other then on planet Earth, and again while Earthly visitations are possible, we have again, none of the required evidence to support any visitation.
Those facts may put a hole in some people's dreams and disrupt their penchant for the awe and mystery that woo woo holds for them, but at this time those are the facts.
 
But no point reporting you - admin loves your bating-flaming-trolling 'contributions' here.
And the 'best' part - none of your continued lying, trolling, deflecting, derailing attempts etc, will receive the slightest forum admin/mod reprimand. Charmed life. Such is SF. Bye.
You are not by any chance trying to now bully the mods and admins on this forum, as you have the members over the years that dare disagree with you, or take you to task on any matter, are you? Surely not!
Bye q-reeus I'm a busy little beaver!
 
You are not by any chance trying to now bully the mods and admins on this forum, as you have the members over the years that dare disagree with you, or take you to task on any matter, are you? Surely not!
Bye q-reeus I'm a busy little beaver!
Bullying? LOL. Only if they are prone to jumping at shadows. Get a better dictionary maybe.
 
Back
Top