Time and space has no connection.

Yes, the entire Universe has been counted. Time is counted, there is no argument against this. rather than a countdown, it is a count up.

Humanity has been counting from the beginning of ''time''.

Time is counting.

Time is elapsing. People count jelly beans, and seconds. When they count seconds they say "Mississippi" in between 1 and 2 and 3 etc. So it sounds like this in real time...One Mississippi, two Mississippi, three Mississippi...etc.

See?

And counting Jelly beans it goes like this...1 jelly bean. 2 jelly beans. 3 jelly beans.

Are you starting to get a feel for the difference between counting this time thing and counting jelly beans?
 
Not true. The object evolved with time.
The object evolved regardless of ''time'', time is not a thing.

The concept of time was accepted without question by science. It is used in most experimental observations.

Time is the counting of existence, and the counting of the universe. Time has no value, it is infinite as a invisible pink Unicorn.
All values in science can be related to counting.

Counting and space only has a connection in that space has been counted.

All actions and interactions are countable.

The framework of space is mankind. Mankind defines time of existence, defining a value for the none existence.

Counting every process.
 
The concept of time was accepted without question by science. It is used in most experimental observations.

That's because time is real and of course they know probably a million times more facts and science then you ever will.

Time is the counting of existence, and the counting of the universe. Time has no value, it is infinite as a invisible pink Unicorn.


You seem obsessed with pink Unicorns. At least you are in the right forum for them. :)
 
That's because time is real and of course they know probably a million times more facts and science then you ever will.
Your universal model that Kepler calculated the maths for is an abacus, what you predict, is not predictions, but paths on the abacus that are counted.

Time is counting, and counting is not time, because time exists without evolution, time existed before the big bang, time is not countable because it never ends.

It never ends because it is not a thing, it is only counting by humanity, a counting of nothing.
 
The object evolved regardless of ''time'', time is not a thing.

The concept of time was accepted without question by science. It is used in most experimental observations.

Time is the counting of existence, and the counting of the universe. Time has no value, it is infinite as a invisible pink Unicorn.
All values in science can be related to counting.

Counting and space only has a connection in that space has been counted.

All actions and interactions are countable.

The framework of space is mankind. Mankind defines time of existence, defining a value for the none existence.

Counting every process.

Time is life. If there were no time there would be no life everything would be dead.
 
Your universal model that Kepler calculated the maths for is an abacus, what you predict, is not predictions, but paths on the abacus that are counted.

Time is counting, and counting is not time, because time exists without evolution, time existed before the big bang, time is not countable because it never ends.

It never ends because it is not a thing, it is only counting by humanity, a counting of nothing.


No, time [ and space] is what separates us from the BB, and me from you.
If you have any other hypothesis, then you need observational and/or experimental evidence to support your concept, or invalidate the incumbent model.
Then you need peer review.
I doubt you have or can get either but best of luck. :)
 
Your universal model that Kepler calculated the maths for is an abacus, what you predict, is not predictions, but paths on the abacus that are counted.
Evidently you have no idea what Kepler did, why he did it, how he did it, and what astonishing discovery he made in the end of his work, and what new mystery remained unsolved afterwards. Otherwise you wouldn't characterize his work as you just did.

Time is counting,
Time is a continuum, which has little or nothing to do with counting. And it is relative, which makes counting rather pointless and unrelated to its nature.

and counting is not time, because time exists without evolution,
Time doesn't exactly exist. It's spanned by things that exist. It's better to say "time persists" instead of "time exists".

time existed before the big bang,
The Big Bang has no "before".

time is not countable because it never ends.
Time is not exactly countable because it's a continuum, and it's relative. Whether or not it ends is beyond the scope of human knowledge.

It never ends because it is not a thing, it is only counting by humanity, a counting of nothing.
No, none of those are true.

You actually haven't said anything meaningful at all.
 
suicide11.gif
 
Time is life. If there were no time there would be no life everything would be dead.
I can stop counting time now and I do not die. Time is only a thing, because we ''count'' it, as a thing, the word is actual timing, by timing we record events, and make ''predictions'', this is a logical axiom.
 
Evidently you have no idea what Kepler did, why he did it, how he did it, and what astonishing discovery he made in the end of his work, and what new mystery remained unsolved afterwards. Otherwise you wouldn't characterize his work as you just did.


Time is a continuum, which has little or nothing to do with counting. And it is relative, which makes counting rather pointless and unrelated to its nature.


Time doesn't exactly exist. It's spanned by things that exist. It's better to say "time persists" instead of "time exists".


The Big Bang has no "before".


Time is not exactly countable because it's a continuum, and it's relative. Whether or not it ends is beyond the scope of human knowledge.


No, none of those are true.

You actually haven't said anything meaningful at all.
Our quest, persists, we persist in timing our existence, and fitting a universe around our timing scale. We try to record something that is infinite and uncountable, time does not exist has you agree , and say it persists, if it does not exist, it can never start, and it can never end.
 
Time is a Universal potential expressed as a mathematical function of the universe. The permissive condition of the universe allows for the fundamental deterministic function of cause and effect. As cause and effect by definition occur in a form of chronology and the duration of every chronological event is measurable in a mathematical account of "time of change" and if the chronology continues, resulting in a "time line".

In the absence of any change resulting in a countable chronology, the time line is dropped and again becomes a latent potential of the universe.

What we call Time consist of a near infinite number of individual time lines, which form into overlapping time line bundles, exponentially expanding and responding to addition of individual timelines or the end of individual timelines.

In a dynamic Universe there is no separate plenum where time exists independent of change, there is no seperate plenum where mathematics exist independent of change. These latent abilities are inherent potentials of Universal physical and geometric space configurations and become expressed in reality only as a by-product of change. Hence the term Spacetime. We popularly refer to spacetime potentials as Laws of Nature, or more generally Universal Laws, which allow us to assign values to our observations of the physical (material) events in the universe.

Time is a mathematical term (abstraction), used in the accounting of duration of chronological change, IMO.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top