yesSo 345 jelly beans is the same as 345 seconds?
yesSo 345 jelly beans is the same as 345 seconds?
Yes, the entire Universe has been counted. Time is counted, there is no argument against this. rather than a countdown, it is a count up.
Yes, the entire Universe has been counted. Time is counted, there is no argument against this. rather than a countdown, it is a count up.
Humanity has been counting from the beginning of ''time''.
Time is counting.
Are you starting to get a feel for the difference between counting this time thing and counting jelly beans?
Time is neither distance or space, time is an invention by humanity to record our own existence.
No literally count. One two three how, far have you gone? Three spaces. Time is an intrinsic to existence.
disagree
time is intrinsic to perception and understanding of things
but not intrinsic to the object it self
The object evolved regardless of ''time'', time is not a thing.Not true. The object evolved with time.
The concept of time was accepted without question by science. It is used in most experimental observations.
Time is the counting of existence, and the counting of the universe. Time has no value, it is infinite as a invisible pink Unicorn.
You seem obsessed with pink Unicorns. At least you are in the right forum for them.
Your universal model that Kepler calculated the maths for is an abacus, what you predict, is not predictions, but paths on the abacus that are counted.That's because time is real and of course they know probably a million times more facts and science then you ever will.
The object evolved regardless of ''time'', time is not a thing.
The concept of time was accepted without question by science. It is used in most experimental observations.
Time is the counting of existence, and the counting of the universe. Time has no value, it is infinite as a invisible pink Unicorn.
All values in science can be related to counting.
Counting and space only has a connection in that space has been counted.
All actions and interactions are countable.
The framework of space is mankind. Mankind defines time of existence, defining a value for the none existence.
Counting every process.
Your universal model that Kepler calculated the maths for is an abacus, what you predict, is not predictions, but paths on the abacus that are counted.
Time is counting, and counting is not time, because time exists without evolution, time existed before the big bang, time is not countable because it never ends.
It never ends because it is not a thing, it is only counting by humanity, a counting of nothing.
Evidently you have no idea what Kepler did, why he did it, how he did it, and what astonishing discovery he made in the end of his work, and what new mystery remained unsolved afterwards. Otherwise you wouldn't characterize his work as you just did.Your universal model that Kepler calculated the maths for is an abacus, what you predict, is not predictions, but paths on the abacus that are counted.
Time is a continuum, which has little or nothing to do with counting. And it is relative, which makes counting rather pointless and unrelated to its nature.Time is counting,
Time doesn't exactly exist. It's spanned by things that exist. It's better to say "time persists" instead of "time exists".and counting is not time, because time exists without evolution,
The Big Bang has no "before".time existed before the big bang,
Time is not exactly countable because it's a continuum, and it's relative. Whether or not it ends is beyond the scope of human knowledge.time is not countable because it never ends.
No, none of those are true.It never ends because it is not a thing, it is only counting by humanity, a counting of nothing.
I can stop counting time now and I do not die. Time is only a thing, because we ''count'' it, as a thing, the word is actual timing, by timing we record events, and make ''predictions'', this is a logical axiom.Time is life. If there were no time there would be no life everything would be dead.
Our quest, persists, we persist in timing our existence, and fitting a universe around our timing scale. We try to record something that is infinite and uncountable, time does not exist has you agree , and say it persists, if it does not exist, it can never start, and it can never end.Evidently you have no idea what Kepler did, why he did it, how he did it, and what astonishing discovery he made in the end of his work, and what new mystery remained unsolved afterwards. Otherwise you wouldn't characterize his work as you just did.
Time is a continuum, which has little or nothing to do with counting. And it is relative, which makes counting rather pointless and unrelated to its nature.
Time doesn't exactly exist. It's spanned by things that exist. It's better to say "time persists" instead of "time exists".
The Big Bang has no "before".
Time is not exactly countable because it's a continuum, and it's relative. Whether or not it ends is beyond the scope of human knowledge.
No, none of those are true.
You actually haven't said anything meaningful at all.