Time and space has no connection.

[paddoboy]

I also said I would read it fully later, I stated it looks gibberish, not is gibberish. I can not conclude, by only a glance that it is gibberish, but I can conclude from a glance , to me, it looks gibberish. I also would agree that it may be a lack of understanding from not reading it.
Do you sir , not make a post without mentioning the word banned?.

I put forward to you, that it is not my lack of knowledge about Physics, but your lack of complete understanding of what I am saying and making points on.

I have already provided a relativistic model of why time dilation is not true, and to show that ''time'' , in humanity terms is timing.

The model is an absoluteness to the reality of the observable Universe, all dimensions <humanity version>, being isotropic to distance measured, by timing.

The model can be placed inside the 9 dimensional cube I originally mentioned, made ''transparent'', rotated, flipped upside down, and you can see the steady state of the Universe is counted.

You have nothing but a personal hypothesis, that fails at the most basic level of making successful predictions, has no observational evidence to support it, and does not invalidate the incumbent model.
You have nothing....that's why you were permanently banned, and that's why your other thread was shifted to pseudoscience.

My fault here at this time is not ignoring you and your nonsense like most are......

 

[theorist-constant12345]

You have nothing but a personal hypothesis, that fails at the most basic level of making successful predictions, has observational evidence to support it, or invalidates the incumbent model.
You have nothing....that's why you were permanently banned, and that's why your other thread was shifted to pseudoscience.

My fault here at this time is not ignoring you and your nonsense like most are......

You make predictions, I have proved all of maths is fallacy by human intervention of counting. And invented to ''fit'' the Universal template.

You sir are truly not being objective to any ideas. You are not discussing the idea, and reciting back from people who proceeded you. You are equal to a Turin test bot, with repetitive citations of history.

Axioms sir, and very simple ones of absoluteness values...............

 

[paddoboy]

You make predictions, I have proved all of maths is fallacy by human intervention of counting. And invented to ''fit'' the Universal template.

You are either delusional or telling porky pies.
But that's OK.....you carry on...your reputation for nonsense and previous permanent bannings reveals where you are coming from.

And yes I know, you don't know how to get all your ground breaking physics and models peer reviewed....
Try harder...you maybe in line for the physics Nobel prize next year. [tic mode on of course]

 

[origin]

You make predictions, I have proved all of maths is fallacy by human intervention of counting.

Wow, what a wonderfully deluded statement.

 

[paddoboy]

Wow, what a wonderfully deluded statement.

There is a non zero chance though we have another Einstein on our hands. [tic mode most certainly switched on]

 

[river]

There is a non zero chance though we have another Einstein on our hands. [tic mode most certainly switched on]

Would you recognise another Einstein if he crossed your path though ?

 

[Stryder]

theorist-constant12345,
You seem to be purposely blind to certain points, like for instance time obviously exists independent of our observations because even when we aren't here things still change in positioning/decay/direction etc. If you for instance died some time in the future, the "Human observation of time" as you put it doesn't cease time from continuing, the nature of time and the universe is somewhat bigger than just your or my observations, after all the nature of the entire cosmos involve time as being integral to all it's actions.

I'm pretty sure this "Theory" that you put forward is literally a tar-pit for the argumentative and you're likely using this subject to just get under peoples skins.

I'm not as too sure as to how much "time" is left for this particular thread topic before it ends up Cesspooled.

 

[paddoboy]

Would you recognise another Einstein if he crossed your path though ?

Well I certainly have not recognised any here. Especially in the fringe sections.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Theory dropped I will now only participate in this forum answering peoples simple questions about present information.

 

[krash661]

Would you recognise another Einstein if he crossed your path though ?

there are " other einsteins " they're just not known to the public.

 

[river]

there are " other einsteins " they're just not known to the public.

True

Hence why I read

Because some publish their thinking

I don't google , I read

Its only through reading their book that you get the complete details of their thinking