YOU present stuff that calls into question something you don't understand, via a video.
Yes I raised something but at no point did I claim it was proof of this or that you put up videos claiming they were proof ....can you see the difference?
They are on the Moon in low gravity, same inertia but with different friction and motion - I would be staggered if it didn't look odd. The whole point is that every single instance where we see jumps, objects or anything falling it can be shown within a very reasonable scientific rigour to be at Lunar freefall. When we adjust the speed for Earth freefall it looks absurd. EVERY piece of video.
Look I am in agreement but I could not help pointing out a video is hardly scientific proof and perhaps that is a point best made to Fat Fredie.
I understand how exasperated you must be and that what I am on about will be lost on you and I have no problem with that...and so I won't argue with you, you are not my target.
That is why I presented two videos that show soil landing at the same time. Clearly we can see the wave of regolith, clearly seen at the same height and the last part of the wave hitting exactly as he lands.
I did understand. Like there was nothing that was difficult to grasp.
Of course not!! He is being suspended the dust is not. Bloody obvious. The wires alter the rate of fall
OK.
I was referring to the details in my post that I have no doubt you missed was my point...as to the other details I already assumed that you knew what you were talking about.
Dude, watch it again and look at the soil being kicked. The astronauts appear to be moving slower, the soil is getting kicked massive distances and fast.
I get it but I was not talking about that when I posted the videos for Paddo the dust kicking was already water under the bridge...
Why don't you assume that all you post I understand...cause I do. Now the dust videos do not alter the fact there is other footage which by any standard ( well my opinion to be clear) is suspect...you putting up other videos is really not an answer ... Anyways don't worry as I am confident the videos I refer to where they appear to float can only be doctored...I don't plan to try and convince anyone of that as it is clear they are floating ..in my opinion.
Your floaty bit has to be the sequence at 4.59 - he weighs 6olb in total he is using his left arm to hold himself and then his PLSS and forward motion to right himself.
I can't resist so sorry to take advantage of your exasperation ..but..one moment you enlist the weight on their back expressing it as 100 lbs then here because less weight suits you you go that way..if nothing else you are somewhat inconsistent.
In any event I don't care, I am not putting up those videos to prove a thing..you have looked and see no problem..I am happy that you looked, if you can see it as normal and realistic again I have no problem..my only point was and is..to me it just looks inconsistent with what I expect...nothing more...and I will bet if you showed it to 100 people 90 of them would agree with me...well I don't bet but I said that to illustrate that is seems most odd to me.
I has been nice chatting with you.
As I predicted Fat Freddy won't answer me, he knows I have nailed him to the floor and can only lose if he tries to continue.
Let each post he makes that does not address my simple question serve as an example of his fear to reply and answer my simple question.
Folk like Fredie put up so many things it is impossible to deal with them, so rather than argue about this or that lets just get his one piece of evidence, it only takes one remember, and we can argue about that..and I would ask others to back me up here by asking the same question...and hopefully by denying him room to move we can make him admit that he does not have one single piece of evidence to show the Apollo missions did not take place.
He either has it or he does not. One single piece of evidence that should be easy.
Alex
Alex
