Sexual Desire male/female
- Thread starter madanthonywayne
- Start date
I don't look into peoples' faces anymore. I generally look at peoples' shoes to know were they are and avoid them and meanwhile look around like I am looking for something, it works. I am safe.
Asguard, let me go ...
I need no help. I am perfectly well. thank you.
I was always well. I have no problems. I never had any problems.
you have no problem?
You just said you dont have the courage to raise your eyes above the ground and you think your ok?
Well if that makes you happy go for it but i think you will find a psycologist will be MUCH more helpfull than wineing to an internet board of people who could care less
You just said you dont have the courage to raise your eyes above the ground and you think your ok?
Well if that makes you happy go for it but i think you will find a psycologist will be MUCH more helpfull than wineing to an internet board of people who could care less
Asguard I am discussing issues. You ask, I answer. Someone else asks, I answer. I ask, I wait for reply. Discussion of a topic is of my priority. I do however over-dramatize issues of discussion, so that it is of higher acuteness and interest to both of us.
yes, in the past. But what about now? Are we talking about the sexual desires of women then or now?
Hi everyone - new to the discussion - but I've been lurking all the while 
I think orleander's point is a valid one and relevant not just to this thread. Not meaning to make unfair generalisations here but men, when talking about women, seem to take every one of their points back to the stone age. However, if that's the basis for your argument then you are effectively saying that women and their sexual relationships haven't changed since the dawn of man.
We live in an age where women take positions as prominent politicians; being actually elected and not just within the monarchy. We live in an age where women compete with men in the workplace and can achieve the same university and higher education degrees/diplomas/awards as the opposite sex.
Even as little a while ago as the turn of the nineteenth century, none of this would have been possible. You may argue that this is just social and economic change but then comes the question, is it nurture or nature? (ie) Is a person affected by their environment? If so, such a drastic change in society can only herald a change in the behaviours and feelings of the people themselves.
Therefore, madanthonywayne, the reasoning behind a woman's more guarded approach to sex, may be more complex than you think.
I think orleander's point is a valid one and relevant not just to this thread. Not meaning to make unfair generalisations here but men, when talking about women, seem to take every one of their points back to the stone age. However, if that's the basis for your argument then you are effectively saying that women and their sexual relationships haven't changed since the dawn of man.
We live in an age where women take positions as prominent politicians; being actually elected and not just within the monarchy. We live in an age where women compete with men in the workplace and can achieve the same university and higher education degrees/diplomas/awards as the opposite sex.
Even as little a while ago as the turn of the nineteenth century, none of this would have been possible. You may argue that this is just social and economic change but then comes the question, is it nurture or nature? (ie) Is a person affected by their environment? If so, such a drastic change in society can only herald a change in the behaviours and feelings of the people themselves.
Therefore, madanthonywayne, the reasoning behind a woman's more guarded approach to sex, may be more complex than you think.
VI, i guess its a question of what inderviduals want to do. Do you follow bilogical imperitive or do you follow your ethical code.
Im not stupid enough to ignore the fact that these imperitives exist but having been cheated on i also know what it feels like to be on the other side of the fence. So i chose to follow my head rather than my testicalls
Im not stupid enough to ignore the fact that these imperitives exist but having been cheated on i also know what it feels like to be on the other side of the fence. So i chose to follow my head rather than my testicalls
LOL, I think you need to stick with calling them balls.
As far as following the biological imperative, well, any woman who is on birth control is going against it. They demand their right to go against it.
The biological impertive is to reproduce but that part tends to be overruled (by condoms, the pill ect). However people still cheat because its "fun", "feels good" whatever which is a perfect example of the base level desires we are all born with. Parents then spend the next 16? years trying to reprograme this and in the main it seems to work (i think the cheating rate tends to flutuate around 10%) so parents are 90% successful at making there kids think about the long term, who they will hurt ect over short term gratification (ie getting off)
They don't cheat because its fun and feels good. They cheat because they don't care enough about the other person to be faithful. The fun/feel good part is just a bonus.
Base level desires??? What kind of people do you date? And seriously, considering how little sex you have, how are you an expert on it? Especially on why a woman does it?
Base level desires??? What kind of people do you date? And seriously, considering how little sex you have, how are you an expert on it? Especially on why a woman does it?
orleander, so you subscribe to the "its always the males fault then"?
I surpose you think that if a stupid slut goes out and gets drunk and fucks around its MY fault because i was working at the time and so she couldnt wait till i finished work to get laid?
I surpose you think that if a stupid slut goes out and gets drunk and fucks around its MY fault because i was working at the time and so she couldnt wait till i finished work to get laid?