(See the 00:30 time mark of the video in post #522.)
No, it's not. If it was being dragged through liquid it would always trail the header of the flag. It would never move independently through the water and hit something nearby. Never.
Nope. I've spent a lot of time underwater. Flags simply don't move like that underwater. Nor do loose straps, lines, or even fins.
(see video in post #522, 00:32 time mark)
Water is very viscous. A piece of fabric will not shoot through that water to hit something far away. Just not going to happen.
Nope. Not unless there was a current pushing it in that direction. And since its end whips in all directions - that's not possible either.
No, it doesn't. The only direction it ever moves is with the current. Never against.
You're not addressing my actual argument. I'm saying that when it was filmed, the astronaut made the flag hit his helmet at a very slow speed. Do you admit that's possible? Then, they played it back at a high speed to make it look like they were in a vacuum. That's the argument. Please address my argument.
This makes no sense whatsoever. Whether a flag is in a current or someone is dragging a flag underwater, water is moving past the flag and making it flutter. The fluttering of the Chinese flag is obviously in a medium as it behaves the same way the underwater flags do.
And you ignored my post...why should we care?
No, it is not. How would he do that? Telekinesis?
There is nothing they could have done - faster playback, slower playback - to make a flag whap his faceplate from some distance away had it been in water.
No. Never, in any of those videos, does the flag move away from the current. Ever. You have posted excellent proof that your own claims are false.
(see video in post #22)
(from the 00:30 time mark of the video)
I alreay addressed this in post #519.
Nope. No matter what speed you film it at, a piece of fabric will not work its way up against the current. It will follow the current. Always.
You don't even seem to have understood my argument. I think you're just playing games.
You do not have any argument, other then a load of fabricated bullshit, you like rambling on about, simply to gain attention.
Pot, Kettle, Black!!
He's given you far more time and consideration then you ever deserve, and which I certainly will not entertain, one iota.
Let's hear your analysis of the buoyant safety cable issue.
Yes, I see that Idiot was justifiably banned also.
Your behaviour is not that of an objective truth-seeker. You seem to be checkmated. If you're not checkmated, explain how the behaviour of those safety cables is consistent with their being in a vacuum and not in water.
I have explained why your argument is incorrect, and the science behind it. You cannot accept the truth so you play ignorant.
A buoyant cable would always float in one direction. This one did not. Sometimes it moves upward, sometimes downward, sometimes left and right - depending on what the guy is doing with the other end. Which is exactly what you'd expect in zero gravity.
He was an Idiot. He was banned, permanently!
I suggest you go and play some Chess, as you are getting no where here with your bullshit.Is English your third language? Any pretended, supposed anomaly that you think you and your fellow conspiracists see, is nothing but a figment of your imagination, and a quest to continue to get some attention.
Anyone who watches it will see that's not the case.
