Dude, he banged a hooker. He didn't claim he was just getting a massage. He wasn't a paid abstinence advocate. He wasn't a goddamned priest fiddling with the choirboys.
No, but you're ignoring the obvious. His public persona and his rise to power are very much wrapped in the cloak of the moral crusader. Not to mention, he investigated prostitution rings during his tenure as AG, and when he busted them up, he claimed he did so for social and moral reasons. By that rationale, engaging in the anti-social and immoral behavior he successfully prosecuted is the very definition of hypocrisy.
Well, duh. Doesn't change the fact that those people are shameless perverts who would be better off paying attention to their own sex lives instead of other people's.
Well, duh? Your commentator seemed to assert that most of America doesn't view prostitution as immoral, which strikes me as the kind of progressive viewpoint an urban elite mistakingly espouses as truth. I think a great deal of American thinks prostitution is immoral — not that it matters. The simple fact is that prostitution IS illegal, and when one is caught doing illegal things, the rule of law demands they be punished accordingly. On that, I think an even greater majority of Americans would agree...
On the other point: Being a pervert isn't illegal, sex sells and to gossip is human. In other words, people are going to care about this for all the shallow and shameless reasons they care about the social and reproductive lives of celebrities. You and I might not like it, but reality is what it is.
And that's kind of the point. Welcome to the twenty-first century, Counte. This is the United States of America, and in case you weren't aware, we Americans like to pretend we're smart, sophisticated, worldly people. We have opinions about everything. Yet, for some reason, those opinions are often really childish.
Why? Because they don't match up with yours? You speak of childishness? I'd argue it's childish to not accept the fact that other people can have a legitimate difference of opinion and that it's even more childish to look at the world and hope/pray/yearn for the day that it reflects, almost exactly, what YOU want...
Perhaps the people in "flyover country" ought to wake up and realize the damage of prohibition.
There is an argument to be made for legalization of human vices like drugs and prostitution, and despite what you probably think, my thoughts are closer to yours on this subject than you might think. However, such arguments seem a tad opportunistic, given the circumstances here. Again, the fact is that what Spitzer did is illegal. One does not go before a judge and talk about changing the law. What's more, even if prostitution was legal, what Spitzer did is immoral and unethical.
thanks for helping make prostitution so sordid.
That's an interesting argument, because even in the places where prostitution is legal, say the Netherlands, it doesn't become much more reputable. The establishments offering it are still shady, the girls still questionable, their physical and mental health still suspect. It's not as if prostitution will ever be like buying a car, or perhaps more accurately, paying for the services of a doctor.
Oh, right, my bad. A bunch of nosy prudes in "flyover country" apparently care. You know, the same bunch that think gays are the end of civilized society, want their women to be baby factories, and can't tell the difference between a scientific theory and a goddamn fairy tale?
You can resort to hyperbole all you like, but the fact is the Feds care, too. And I bet his wife cares. I bet his daughters care...
As for the sinister application of Federal justice that some have alleged, it seems the Feds were looking at this prior to Spitzer being involved. In other words, he just happened into an ongoing investigation. So theory debunked...
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8VB7N800&show_article=1