Nope. Antimatter has opposite CHARGES on its leptons and baryons. Charge, not magnetism.
My time is done here .
- Thread starter river
- Start date
- Status
A physical property related to electric field. You can measure it by measuring force exerted on a charged particle in an electric field.
Xelasnave.1947
Valued Senior Member
Why do you think that is the case river?
Alex
The universe is based on gravity, and the strong force, and the weak force, and electromagnetism. Electric fields make up about 1/8 of the forces in the universe.
No they don't. They produce different products depending on the reaction. Most likely product are plain old photons. Not "electricity."
And the most pervasive. It's what holds our solar system together over distances of 5 billion km.
Last edited:
Nope. Photons and baryons actually appeared around the same time - about 10 seconds after the big bang.
I once read a book [in an effort to stay open minded] entitles "The Big Bang Never Happened" by Eric J Lerner. The work was quickly demolished and refuted by reputable authorities and experts on another forum.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Electric_Universe
Electric Universe (EU) is an umbrella term that covers various pseudo-scientificcosmological ideas built around the claim that the formation and existence of various features of the Universe can be better explained by electricity and magnetism than by gravity alone. As a rule, EU is usually touted as an aether-based theory with numerous references to tall tales from mythology.[2][3] However, the exact details and claims are ambiguous, lack mathematical formalism, and often vary from one delusional crank to the next.
EU advocates can be roughly split into two groups. The first are garden-variety physics cranks who are convinced that they have a legitimate, revolutionary scientific theory, and that the scientific establishment is either blindly ignoring them out of misplaced faith in their own theories, or deliberately suppressing them for some greater, nefarious purpose.
The second group is composed of various other woo-peddlers who use EU claims to prop up their main ideas (because mainstream physics would blow them apart). For these people, the EU hypothesis is a means to an end, not an end in and of itself. The more common subsets of this group include some Young Earth creationists, who wish to discredit the mainstream cosmology and geology suggesting that Earth is billions of years old, and some of the loonier fringes of global warming denialism (such as Vault-Co), who are trying to find some process outside human control that they can attribute climate change to. The latter particularly like the hypotheses of Pierre-Marie Robitaille.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Electric_Universe
Electric Universe (EU) is an umbrella term that covers various pseudo-scientificcosmological ideas built around the claim that the formation and existence of various features of the Universe can be better explained by electricity and magnetism than by gravity alone. As a rule, EU is usually touted as an aether-based theory with numerous references to tall tales from mythology.[2][3] However, the exact details and claims are ambiguous, lack mathematical formalism, and often vary from one delusional crank to the next.
EU advocates can be roughly split into two groups. The first are garden-variety physics cranks who are convinced that they have a legitimate, revolutionary scientific theory, and that the scientific establishment is either blindly ignoring them out of misplaced faith in their own theories, or deliberately suppressing them for some greater, nefarious purpose.
The second group is composed of various other woo-peddlers who use EU claims to prop up their main ideas (because mainstream physics would blow them apart). For these people, the EU hypothesis is a means to an end, not an end in and of itself. The more common subsets of this group include some Young Earth creationists, who wish to discredit the mainstream cosmology and geology suggesting that Earth is billions of years old, and some of the loonier fringes of global warming denialism (such as Vault-Co), who are trying to find some process outside human control that they can attribute climate change to. The latter particularly like the hypotheses of Pierre-Marie Robitaille.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
But the BB came from nothing . So ten seconds from nothing , came photons and baryons .
Where is the logic ?
The same logic that applies when one asks the question, where did magnetism/electricity come form? Or where did god come from.
The answer is we don't know the exact processes of the BB, but educated speculation tells us from a fluctuation in the quantum foam....the quantum foam being nothing and as close to nothing as we can get.
- Status