My time is done here .

Status
Not open for further replies.
wegs said:
I’m not familiar no...post a clip. :smile:
Click to expand...
First episode here:


The protagonist, played by Patrick McGoohan, finds himself in The Village and tries repeatedly to escape, to no avail.

If you don't fancy watching a complete episode, then the opening sequence will give you an idea. It has become something of a cult classic. :smile:
 
Anyway ; to reiterate , from my posts #40

Here's the thing about antimatter and matter ;
Its about polarity . In the youtube video , " The Matter of Antimatter " , matter is positive antimatter is negative .

That's it .

Now think about why would both necessarily ; " annihilate each other . Just because the polarities are opposite .
 
Last edited:
river said:
When ones freedom of speech is restricted , again , without real merit . It gives me pause for thought .
Click to expand...
So someone deciding to not read what you write is "restricting your freedom of speech?" That's not how it works, River. You are free to spew whatever nonsense you want. Everyone is free to ignore it.
 
river said:
Indeed start a thread pad . And one where I can contribute posts .

Response to the highlighted ;

Explain how this is even possible . pad
Click to expand...
river, river, river.....It is your right to spew whatever nonsensical crap that you feel like. And it is also the right of others that recognise such crap to scientifically critique it. This is afterall a science forum and as such the scientific methodology and critique reign supreme.
But you are unable to accept such scientific critique, and having no answers to that critique, you then troll. That's why you are banned from the sciences.
If I start a thread on matter, anti matter it will be where it should be, in the sciences. You being banned there is not any hindrance to your freedom of speech, its a barrier to stop you posting crap, refusing to answer questions, repeating your crap, and trolling.

I'm sure there must be a pseudoscience forum somewhere that caters to your nonsense, without the need for any scientific critique...why not try there?
 
river said: ↑
When ones freedom of speech is restricted , again , without real merit . It gives me pause for thought .
Click to expand...


billvon said:
So someone deciding to not read what you write is "restricting your freedom of speech?" That's not how it works, River. You are free to spew whatever nonsense you want. Everyone is free to ignore it.
Click to expand...

To your first statement , No



Where did all this come from ? ( highlighted ) Not from me .
 
paddoboy said:
river, river, river.....It is your right to spew whatever nonsensical crap that you feel like. And it is also the right of others that recognise such crap to scientifically critique it. This is afterall a science forum and as such the scientific methodology and critique reign supreme.
But you are unable to accept such scientific critique, and having no answers to that critique, you then troll. That's why you are banned from the sciences.
If I start a thread on matter, anti matter it will be where it should be, in the sciences. You being banned there is not any hindrance to your freedom of speech, its a barrier to stop you posting crap, refusing to answer questions, repeating your crap, and trolling.

I'm sure there must be a pseudoscience forum somewhere that caters to your nonsense, without the need for any scientific critique...why not try there?
Click to expand...


Give me a critique in a thread I can respond to
 
Anyway ; from my posts # 40 and 42

Anyway ; to reiterate , from my posts #40
Here's the thing about antimatter and matter ;
Its about polarity . In the youtube video , " The Matter of Antimatter " , matter is positive antimatter is negative .

That's it .

Now think about why would both necessarily ; " annihilate each other . Just because the polarities are opposite .

How would any particle manifest without opposite polarities ?
 
Last edited:
river said:
Anyway ; to reiterate , from my posts #40

Here's the thing about antimatter and matter ;
Its about polarity . In the youtube video , " The Matter of Antimatter " , matter is positive antimatter is negative .

That's it .

Now think about why would both necessarily ; " annihilate each other . Just because the polarities are opposite .
Click to expand...
No that's not it and is totally wrong. As to why, I would use the same argument that you incorrectly use to make your unsupported assertion that they do not annihilate....opposite charges and parity. I would also give particle accelerators and colliders as examples where such has possibly been verified.
Now river I understand that you will reject that critique, simply because your rather childish persona, stops you accepting any scientific critique as opposed to your own make up pseudoscientific version.
Here's a couple of professional scientific answers river, which obviously you will again reject for the same childish reasons and probably well above your pay grade....
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-matter...nd-antimatter-merely-one-of-electrical-charge
"When a massive particle and antiparticle meet (and are moving slowly relative to each other), they are in a relatively low entropy state. There are more states available if there are two lighter particles that are moving faster (converting rest mass energy into kinetic energy). Since there is no conservation law that forbids a particle and antiparticle from transforming into an other particle-antiparticle pair (photons are their own antiparticle), there is lower free energy, F = E - T S, where T is the temperature and S is the entropy, if they convert to the lighter particle-antiparticle pair.

Another possible ensemble is one where you repeatedly bring a particle and antiparticle together in otherwise empty space. When you bring together the particle antiparticle pairs one-by-one, there is some non-zero probability that they will annihilate and two faster particles will go off and in empty space and they will never return to recreate the heavy particle antiparticle pair (although they are energetically capable of doing so). If you get repeated attempts to annihilate, the adsorbing state of the system is one where there are no particle-antiparticle pairs".
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

I learnt many years ago river that converting mass into energy has four different methods...chemical reactions, like a fire for example, where around 5% is converted to energy: Nuclear reactions, where much more is converted to energy: matter/anti matter annihilation, where something like 95% is converted to energy: And finally if you chose to convert all of a mass into energy, all you need do is drop it into a BH.
Please don't hold me to those percentage amounts...just a rough estimate to get the idea across.
 
paddoboy said:
No that's not it and is totally wrong. As to why, I would use the same argument that you incorrectly use to make your unsupported assertion that they do not annihilate....opposite charges and parity. I would also give particle accelerators and colliders as examples where such has possibly been verified.
Now river I understand that you will reject that critique, simply because your rather childish persona, stops you accepting any scientific critique as opposed to your own make up pseudoscientific version.
Here's a couple of professional scientific answers river, which obviously you will again reject for the same childish reasons and probably well above your pay grade....
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-matter...nd-antimatter-merely-one-of-electrical-charge
"When a massive particle and antiparticle meet (and are moving slowly relative to each other), they are in a relatively low entropy state. There are more states available if there are two lighter particles that are moving faster (converting rest mass energy into kinetic energy). Since there is no conservation law that forbids a particle and antiparticle from transforming into an other particle-antiparticle pair (photons are their own antiparticle), there is lower free energy, F = E - T S, where T is the temperature and S is the entropy, if they convert to the lighter particle-antiparticle pair.

Another possible ensemble is one where you repeatedly bring a particle and antiparticle together in otherwise empty space. When you bring together the particle antiparticle pairs one-by-one, there is some non-zero probability that they will annihilate and two faster particles will go off and in empty space and they will never return to recreate the heavy particle antiparticle pair (although they are energetically capable of doing so). If you get repeated attempts to annihilate, the adsorbing state of the system is one where there are no particle-antiparticle pairs".
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

I learnt many years ago river that converting mass into energy has four different methods...chemical reactions, like a fire for example, where around 5% is converted to energy: Nuclear reactions, where much more is converted to energy: matter/anti matter annihilation, where something like 95% is converted to energy: And finally if you chose to convert all of a mass into energy, all you need do is drop it into a BH.
Please don't hold me to those percentage amounts...just a rough estimate to get the idea across.
Click to expand...

Fission is not about matter and antimatter .
 
paddoboy said:
No that's not it and is totally wrong. As to why, I would use the same argument that you incorrectly use to make your unsupported assertion that they do not annihilate....opposite charges and parity. I would also give particle accelerators and colliders as examples where such has possibly been verified.
Now river I understand that you will reject that critique, simply because your rather childish persona, stops you accepting any scientific critique as opposed to your own make up pseudoscientific version.
Here's a couple of professional scientific answers river, which obviously you will again reject for the same childish reasons and probably well above your pay grade....
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-matter...nd-antimatter-merely-one-of-electrical-charge
"When a massive particle and antiparticle meet (and are moving slowly relative to each other), they are in a relatively low entropy state. There are more states available if there are two lighter particles that are moving faster (converting rest mass energy into kinetic energy). Since there is no conservation law that forbids a particle and antiparticle from transforming into an other particle-antiparticle pair (photons are their own antiparticle), there is lower free energy, F = E - T S, where T is the temperature and S is the entropy, if they convert to the lighter particle-antiparticle pair.

Another possible ensemble is one where you repeatedly bring a particle and antiparticle together in otherwise empty space. When you bring together the particle antiparticle pairs one-by-one, there is some non-zero probability that they will annihilate and two faster particles will go off and in empty space and they will never return to recreate the heavy particle antiparticle pair (although they are energetically capable of doing so). If you get repeated attempts to annihilate, the adsorbing state of the system is one where there are no particle-antiparticle pairs".
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

I learnt many years ago river that converting mass into energy has four different methods...chemical reactions, like a fire for example, where around 5% is converted to energy: Nuclear reactions, where much more is converted to energy: matter/anti matter annihilation, where something like 95% is converted to energy: And finally if you chose to convert all of a mass into energy, all you need do is drop it into a BH.
Please don't hold me to those percentage amounts...just a rough estimate to get the idea across.
Click to expand...

Antimatter and matter is not about mass , size . Matter and antimatter is fundamentally about polarity . Magnetic .
 
No that's not it and is totally wrong. As to why, I would use the same argument that you incorrectly use to make your unsupported assertion that they do not annihilate....opposite charges and parity. I would also give particle accelerators and colliders as examples where such has possibly been verified.

Now river I understand that you will reject that critique, simply because your rather childish persona, stops you accepting any scientific critique as opposed to your own make up pseudoscientific version.
Here's a couple of professional scientific answers river, which obviously you will again reject for the same childish reasons and probably well above your pay grade....
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-matter...nd-antimatter-merely-one-of-electrical-charge
"When a massive particle and antiparticle meet (and are moving slowly relative to each other), they are in a relatively low entropy state. There are more states available if there are two lighter particles that are moving faster (converting rest mass energy into kinetic energy). Since there is no conservation law that forbids a particle and antiparticle from transforming into an other particle-antiparticle pair (photons are their own antiparticle), there is lower free energy, F = E - T S, where T is the temperature and S is the entropy, if they convert to the lighter particle-antiparticle
Click to expand...

Well you smash anything together at extreme velocities has nothing to do with matter and antimatter .

The difference between matter and antimatter is polarity , magnetic , nothing more or less .

Matter , elements for example , Are because polarities join together , Hydrogen for example . ( proton , with an electron , or electron with a proton ) .
 
Last edited:
exchemist said:
First episode here:


The protagonist, played by Patrick McGoohan, finds himself in The Village and tries repeatedly to escape, to no avail.

If you don't fancy watching a complete episode, then the opening sequence will give you an idea. It has become something of a cult classic. :smile:
Click to expand...
I’m finding British series more entertaining lately than American ones.
 
No that's not it and is totally wrong. As to why, I would use the same argument that you incorrectly use to make your unsupported assertion that they do not annihilate....opposite charges and parity. I would also give particle accelerators and colliders as examples where such has possibly been verified.
Now river I understand that you will reject that critique, simply because your rather childish persona, stops you accepting any scientific critique as opposed to your own make up pseudoscientific version.
Here's a couple of professional scientific answers river, which obviously you will again reject for the same childish reasons and probably well above your pay grade....
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-matter...nd-antimatter-merely-one-of-electrical-charge
"When a massive particle and antiparticle meet (and are moving slowly relative to each other), they are in a relatively low entropy state. There are more states available if there are two lighter particles that are moving faster (converting rest mass energy into kinetic energy). Since there is no conservation law that forbids a particle and antiparticle from transforming into an other particle-antiparticle pair (photons are their own antiparticle), there is lower free energy, F = E - T S, where T is the temperature and S is the entropy, if they convert to the lighter particle-antiparticle
Click to expand...

Well you smash anything together at extreme velocities has nothing to do with matter and antimatter .

The difference between matter and antimatter is polarity , magnetic , nothing more or less .

Matter , elements for example , Are because polarities join together , Hydrogen for example . ( proton , with an electron , or electron with a proton ) .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top