Light, dark and clear

Status
Not open for further replies.
paddoboy said:
:)I'll let our peers on this forum decide who is contradictory, who is delusional, who is ignorant of present day accepted cosmology, and who is likely a religious troll in a familiar guise.
Click to expand...
Again not aimed at anything but me, I am not your agony aunt to talk to.

Again I put pressure questions in place and science crumbles and resorts to their standard transparent behaviour.
 
theorist-constant12345 said:
Again not aimed at anything but me, I am not your agony aunt to talk to.

Again I put pressure questions in place and science crumbles and resorts to their standard transparent behaviour.
Click to expand...
There we go again...delusions by the truck load! :)
The only thing you are pressuring is yourself, and your stay on this forum.
 
theorist-constant12345 said:
This proves what a bad scientist you are, a real scientist knows that religion has a 50/50 argument.
Click to expand...
Wrong again.
There is absolutely no way that the "argument" is 50/ 50.
All you've done here, again, is show that you have a poor grasp of logic.

because you believe in there was nothing before the big bang agreeing with religion.
Click to expand...
And you're wrong here too.
 
theorist-constant12345 said:
Flamer paddy , stop it you are smarter than childish games.
Click to expand...


No I'm no flamer. I am just flabbergasted at how utterly delusional and stupid one person can be.
When you state crap as fact, you will be refuted.
If you continue to quote crap as fact, you will continue to be refuted.
If you refuse to accept answers, and have nothing at all to offer to support your fairy tale like assumptions, your threads will be shifted to pseudoscience and other fringe areas.
If you continue to claim crap as fact, even there you will be refuted.
You may have the right to say what you like, but you are also responsible for what you say.
And others here are also responsible to show that what you claim is not science and is just crap.
That's the way the cookie crumbles. That's the way the ball bounces.
 
Dywyddyr said:
Wrong again.
There is absolutely no way that the "argument" is 50/ 50.
All you've done here, again, is show that you have a poor grasp of logic.


And you're wrong here too.
Click to expand...
Nope your wrong, if you agree in the big bang it is plain and simple you agree with religion.

They certainly have a 50/50 premise because science only has finite.

I do not agree in all of the big bang explanation, neither do I believe in something I can not observe.
 
paddoboy said:
No I'm no flamer. I am just flabbergasted at how utterly delusional and stupid one person can be.
When you state crap as fact, you will be refuted.
If you continue to quote crap as fact, you will continue to be refuted.
If you refuse to accept answers, and have nothing at all to offer to support your fairy tale like assumptions, your threads will be shifted to pseudoscience and other fringe areas.
If you continue to claim crap as fact, even there you will be refuted.
You may have the right to say what you like, but you are also responsible for what you say.
Click to expand...
again aimed at me, in a Psuedo section, the mods can see you re trying to flame , they can see you come in twos.

conversation over.

Trying to wreck the thread again, grow up
 
That's about 200 posts in the last day. How do you find the time, given your domestic situation?
 
theorist-constant12345 said:
Nope your wrong, if you agree in the big bang it is plain and simple you agree with religion.
Click to expand...
Not even close to being true.

They certainly have a 50/50 premise because science only has finite.
Click to expand...
Nope.
If I tell I currently have a coin in my hand is it 50/ 50 that it's a 15-3/4 pence piece?
If I tell you I have a pet is it 50/ 50 that my pet is a unicorn?

I do not agree in all of the big bang explanation, neither do I believe in something I can not observe.
Click to expand...
Then again, you don't believe in learning.
(And what you do observe you make up pure bullshit to "explain").
 
theorist-constant12345 said:
No, it is not garbage, it is the truth so stop lying to the world science, it is a logical impossibility for there to be no space pre-big bang.


FACT - Infinite by logical only possibilities.

You can logically and truthfully say the big bang was an event in space that started the expansion of matter into infinite space.

You can not say - the big bang starting from a singular point of nothing and space expanded .
Click to expand...
You're only lying to yourselves, you will not keep avoiding the truth.
 
theorist-constant12345 said:
Refuted, no this is a discussion forum, not denial with no discourse of the statements.
Click to expand...


We have already discussed your nonsense...many many times.
And it all has been refuted, derided and assigned to the cesspool and fringe sections.
You keep claiming nonsense and it will be refuted by all those that want legitimate science to prevail.
 
paddoboy said:
We have already discussed your nonsense...many many times.
And it all has been refuted, derided and assigned to the cesspool and fringe sections.
You keep claiming nonsense and it will be refuted by all those that want legitimate science to prevail.
Click to expand...
Your doing again, you are not refuting anything you insist on personally attacking me and trying to destroy the thread.
I have already reported you for this.

Answer one question, you say space is expanding from the big bang.

Expanding into what?

You refute nothing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top