I am correct light is clear in space, it is not seen but the presence is constant. It is invisible light.
Light, dark and clear
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
- Status
Fucking bullshit!
CLEAR:
1. Free from clouds, mist, or haze: a clear day.
2. Not obscured or darkened;
LIGHT:
part of the EMS that interacts with the human eye so we can see.
DARK:
Little or no light.
Clear is not a thing. If there was no light, nothing would be clear. If there was no light it would be dark.
Dark is not a thing. It is just the absence of the EMS.
Light is a thing. It reflects, it refracts, it interacts, it lets us see.
Now TC you can continue with your crap for as long as you like, and continue to act all indignant when everyone tells you that you are crazy, and you can continue to claim that you are correct despite what 350 years of evidence, and science has shown us.
You will never be right, other than in your own brain. [and I have my doubts about that]
You are only fooling one person.....yourself!
Nothing to learn except maths really.
No hits and giggles , I am serious.
Not once did I say clear is a thing. Love your contradictions.
"space is full of a clear."
Of a clear light, omg
We have spent days discussing the clear of light in space and you need to be talked to like children, what else do you think we are talking about?
In your own befuddled brain maybe.
In the eyes of the scientific community, the scientific methodology, much observation, much experimentation, much evidence, the BB is rock solid.
In fact any future QGT, and even the Oscillating theory I spoke of before, merely extend the parameters of the BB model of Universal evolution.
My own speculative assumption of the BB being a WH and the arse end of a BH, again does not invalidate the current BB model, but merely extends the parameters of our understanding.
That's what we call science, as opposed to your own stupid ridiculous fairy tales.
I am going to tell you are wrong because you obviously have not even read what I wrote.
When you engage in personal attacks against others who you claim are "like children", it does not help your case to write sentences using poor grammar that most children could correct.
You can tell me what you like. You have nothing supporting any concept you have ever proposed on this forum. That is fact. That is reality.
A comparison aimed widely has no specifics.
You speak of clear and dark as things. You childishly claim light is not a thing.
Yet you speak of contradictions....The stupid childish irony of it all!
Well it is like this, my original abstract I first wrote was always true, my logic is far better than science. I understand everything science says and as a normal person I want answers. Science shy's from the truth's of reality, denies axioms and replies with answers we all know already and in some way deem this to be an answer.
I am telling you and in knowing science of present, that most of your logic is flawed because science somewhere lost the reality of the situations.
Dark and light is a state.You speak of clear and dark as things. You childishly claim light is not a thing.
Yet you speak of contradictions....The stupid childish irony of it all!
Approximately ten different forums now, I have checked, double checked, quadruple checked the present information of processes to be clear that I clearly understood.
And simply what I have been told is has transparent as religion.
And simply what I have been told is has transparent as religion.
Hmmm, ever heard of Occams razor?
The principle states that among competing hypotheses , the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected.
I make one assumption.
You are seriously deluded and need to seek help.
The world is not wrong.
Science is not wrong.
Science acts on experimental and observational evidence.
The obvious axiom that is so evident in discussions with you, is your delusions of grandeur, your ignorance, your refusal to accept answers, and your stubborness.
Taking all that into account, and realising that what you are claiming on this forum, is making no difference to science and the science methodology in general, and that you are pissing into the wind, one must conclude that you are wasting your life with such delusionary assumptions, and just as they laugh at Bozo the clown, they are also laughing at you.
Even on this forum, sadly, I see your stay eventually coming to an end.
My refusal to accept answers, you want me to accept something my logic is telling me is a crock of sxxx.
No more than fables at times and make believe.
A big bang from nothing and before the big bang there was not even space, it is not me whom is deranged and suffers from grandeur.
- Status