That still does not cover how I wanted to separate questions answered.
Impeach Xev?
- Thread starter ElectricFetus
- Start date
- Status
The true intent of the options are inside the parentheses. The seperation between choice 2 and 3 is merely an addition of humor. IMO.
Yes, I understand that. The poll is already up now, and there is no use, making a more fair one. However the 2nd option serves little purpose, than show, that the voters feel Xev is a very flawed person.
I think it is only fair, we use option 1 and 3 and compare the both. While leaving option 2 as some extra information for the admin to come to a verdict.
From the poll it turns out 32 members do not consider Xev to be a good person. That's more than double the amount, that do consider her a good person. Hence, this data would suggest that more than twice do not think highly of Xev. It thus does not bode well for all when such a person is a moderator. In some ways it gives people the lee-way to be just as irresponsible.
I thought you said you were not going to use the second question?
No, we should not use option 2. However, as it's already there, and some people have voted for it - it could be of some use as extra information on what people feel, leaving the verdict in the admin's hands. Either that, or we just completely ignore option 2, and ask people not to vote for it anymore.
I think this will cause controversy if one side can win over the other once the needed 100 votes come in. I think my poll will be screwed to debate unless the “Impeach Xev” votes reaches 51 before the other 2 combined do. Maybe I should ask to have this poll closed, and new very simple and serious 2 question on be made.
Also.. the question says "Should Xev be impeached" - the second choice says "yes" at first.. but the result means do not impeach. I am sure someone has been "tricked" by that. It might help to close this poll and start a new on with only two choices. And the two choices should read "Yes, Xev should be impeached" and "No, Xev should not be impeached."
Perhaps, but just because someone does not like Xev does not mean that person thinks Xev is doing a bad job at moderating the forums. Make sure you keep the two seperate...
crazymikey said:
Perhaps, but just because someone does not like Xev does not mean that person thinks Xev is doing a bad job at moderating the forums. Make sure you keep the two seperate...
Ok I argee I fuck up, I'll try to close it on the grounds that it is not a well design poll for such a serious subject.
Maybe she should be limited her power of Mod.
Xev is a wacko, but an entertaining wacko with a good sense of humor whose posts I've always enjoyed. No reason to discriminate against wackos, she can be a good moderator.
Does anyone actually have evidence of her abusing power, or is it as it seems to be just a bunch of people who don't like her deciding that people they personally don't like shouldn't be moderators?
Does anyone actually have evidence of her abusing power, or is it as it seems to be just a bunch of people who don't like her deciding that people they personally don't like shouldn't be moderators?
Okay fine then ummmmm, then keep her as a MOD. I think she is doing a good job.airavata said:
Look, I enjoyed every lurid minute of the Clinton impeachment. Could we please have a nice big fat scandal about xev? Otherwise 
I'll be forced into Freak Thoughts again.
I'll be forced into Freak Thoughts again.
While I find it highly flattering to be considered a "whacko", none have explained what - precisely - makes me one.
Enlighten a girl.
By the way, I cannot be blamed for my whackiness. This is the fault of the communications satellites controlled by the Mossad which are beaming telegraphic messages into my pineal gland.
Enlighten a girl.
By the way, I cannot be blamed for my whackiness. This is the fault of the communications satellites controlled by the Mossad which are beaming telegraphic messages into my pineal gland.
- Status