cool skill said:
Obviously, you need a magnifying glass.
cool skill said:
Of course, you wish to interpret it as:
CS: Thanks to robots, it requires 0% of the abled bodied population to fulfill all the tasks to provide X to 100% of the population.
How does it feel to be poor?
- Thread starter lixluke
- Start date
Obviously, you need a magnifying glass.
Of course, you wish to interpret it as:
CS: Thanks to robots, it requires 0% of the abled bodied population to fulfill all the tasks to provide X to 100% of the population.
You are as subtle as an elephant, cool skill.....
That would be a perfect scenario......cool skill said:
You are retarded. It is completely unreasonable for you to be asking idiotic questions when I already stated it is a choice. Why don't you go give yourself a reason why you should work or get lost.Jeff 152 said:
You have yet to make any point.
I have provided lots of possible incentives of why people work. Why do you think people work? So they can be productive members of society? Because they choose to? What exactly is the reason people work?
Perhaps you did not read correctly? Or you disagree with my assertion that people provided with proper First World provisions might well laugh in your face if you offer the same shit pay we offer workers to do all of our labor work? Is there a reason why I have to keep repeating myself befor you move on? LEARN TO FUCKING READ.
cool skill, what do you propose in the place of money?
Money in general, obviosuly.
the problem i see with CS' idea is that he proposes a small percentage do not work. a true socialist recongnises that we can produce more than we need, but only a capitalist sees this as an opportunity for a select few to do without working. if we can produce more than we need, then we work less hours, we dont let some people laze around. anyone who is able to work and doesnt should not be entitled to handouts.
????vslayer said:
Please either cite this or discontinue with numb interpretations that have nothing to do with anything being discussed.
People need to stop reading with subjevtively, and adding their own presumptuous interpretation instead of taking what is being written for what it says exactly as it is said.
Show me where I said a small percentage does not work.
Show me where I said that currency period has to be replaced.
Stop asking me questions about things I never mentioned. Stop arguing against things I never stated.
If I never state something, and furthermore state something else, why would you argue against something that was never stated?
