How Do You Report Encyclopedia Trolls

lixluke said:
Learn how to read before you go about yapping your stupidity.
Click to expand...
You're a moron and you're full of shit.

First of all...
If there is direct evidence that someone said something, and later they say, "You are lying. I never said that. Ask ME and I'll tell you the truth." who are you going to believe?

Secondly...
An article ABOUT you doesn't have to be written BY you, nor does the person have to interview you.
How many times have you shared your opinion about someone (famous or not) based on your opinoon of them and other sources without interviewing them? If you say never, you are a damned liar.

Finally...
Talking about intentions and honesty, you are just pissed off and being your typical childish self, because you want to be able to call anyone a jackass and asshole all you want, but when someone deals you back some of the same cards, you blow up and make a big stink about it.

They based the article on what you said yourself, they don't have to interview you.
And, as was said before, it was an article about you, not YOUR article - you don't own it.

Grow up, or go cry to your mommy. Your shit doesn't fly here.
 
lixluke said:
I am not obliged to disprove anything that you have not proven to be true.
Click to expand...
the references are in the article avatar posted, all one has to do is look them up.

but since you feel like pressing the point:
leopold99 said:
there isn't a single agreed upon definition of terrorism.
Click to expand...
lix said:
Who cares?
Discontinue trying to make terrosim ambigous. It has been tried before to no avail.
Click to expand...
leopold said:
2. first time in history where people were given legal rights to property.
Click to expand...
lix said:
By the way, people do not have legal rights to property.
Click to expand...
alva said:
Type Definitions of Terrorism into google, and i'll bet you will find over 100 different definitions...
Click to expand...
lix said:
Irrelevant. Discontinue using fallacies.
Click to expand...

referenced thread:
http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=59712
 
spuriousmonkey said:
Cool skill thinks it's fine and dandy to dangle babies over balconies since it says nothing about the character of the person who does so (ref from above).
Click to expand...
I would like you to show me a reference in which I state this.
NOTE: Do not use completely random references in which I never state that it is OK to dangle babies off of the balcon. Show me exactly where I said that doing so is OK, fine, and dandy.
 
Nickelodeon said:
That the article was largely true.
Click to expand...
No it was not. Either way it was a troll article, and desreved to be fried. Even if there was a large amount of accurate info on there, the article was created by trolls for trolls. You will not see me sitting there, and allowing it without massive retaliation on those assholes. I do not go around vandalizing random articles, and I will not stand for a bunch of jackasses vandalizing mine. I will delete the entire article if it is a trash article vandalization, and attack the vandals as well. They can all go to hell.
 
lixluke said:
I would like you to show me a reference in which I state this.
NOTE: Do not use completely random references in which I never state that it is OK to dangle babies off of the balcon. Show me exactly where I said that doing so is OK, fine, and dandy.
Click to expand...

See post 100. Second link.
 
one_raven said:
An article ABOUT you doesn't have to be written BY you, nor does the person have to interview you.
Click to expand...
I never said an article has to be written by me. Cite where I said that, or stop twisting what I am saying.
I have proven that the article about me was written with clear malicious intent. Therefore, I do not sit there and make adjustments to it. It was a malicious article that I deleted because it was malicious. I then put an accurate article in it's place. Throw all the citations you want into it. A malicious article created by vandals will get deleted, and the vandals will get attacked.
 
spuriousmonkey said:
Unfortunately for you you don't decide who is a [ENC]vandal[/ENC].
Click to expand...
I have already proven that their intent was to troll. They admitted that they will continue to vandalize my article. The even cheered at being a troll as if they were proud of it. Get real.
 
lixluke said:
As stated, discontinue posting links to random articles in which I never make that statement. That is a ranom article you chose out of the forum, and the statement you accused me of has nothing to do with it.

He spurious loves dangling babies over balconies. Proof:
http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=1325629#post1325629
Click to expand...

A thread where you claim MJ dangling babies off balconies says nothing about a person is a random thread????????????????????????????


:jawdrop:
 
You post lies about me, and use a completely random link to cite that I said something you claim I said. Of course, going to the link of the citations where I supposedly made the statement shows that the statement is nowhere to be found.
 
spuriousmonkey said:
A thread where you claim MJ dangling babies off balconies says nothing about a person is a random thread????????????????????????????


:jawdrop:
Click to expand...
Nothing is a random thread unless there is something for it to be referenced from that makes it random.

I can say anything about you, and cite it to any random thread that you posted in. Does that make it a real citation?
Spurious loves dangling babies over balconies. Proof:
http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=63146
 
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1322900&postcount=10
Lixluke said:
Bells said:
On the contrary, his dangling that child over that balcony says everything about him as a person.
Click to expand...

On the contrary, no it does not. Try a rebuttal to the reasons I stated on why it does not instead of repeating that it is or get lost. As for the rest of your post, you are wasting your time here because I do not intend on reading it. The argument cannot go further.
As stated: Hanging a child over the balcony shows nothing about a person. It is simply a petty excuse to attack somebody.
You are bias. Instead of attacking somebody because of an action, you attack somebody, and create an invalid justification for doing so.
Click to expand...
 
Here is the quote of the total random post where you claimed that I stated that dangling babies off of the balcony was OK, fine, dandy, whatever, etc.
lixluke said:
On the contrary, no it does not. Try a rebuttal to the reasons I stated on why it does not instead of repeating that it is or get lost. As for the rest of your post, you are wasting your time here because I do not intend on reading it. The argument cannot go further.
As stated: Hanging a child over the balcony shows nothing about a person. It is simply a petty excuse to attack somebody.
You are bias. Instead of attacking somebody because of an action, you attack somebody, and create an invalid justification for doing so.
Click to expand...

Well what do you know. Nowhere in that totally random article do I ever mention that dangling babies off of a balcony was fine and dandy. Either you need some thick glasses or do not know English if you can find me making that statement anywhere there.
 
Last edited:
Wow look at this post by spurious:
spuriousmonkey said:
I didn't do the study. Don't bash the messenger. Although you people show a great obsession in defending the US and bashing the messengers of bad news.

There must be something psychologically wrong with you people according to yourselves.
Click to expand...

Here is the thread: http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=63146

I even highlighted the statement in red of Spurious clearly stating that it is ok to dangle babies off of a balconey har har har.
There. I cited it, so it must be true. Har har har.

Then your partner can reply:
Sock puppet path said:
Well I was a skeptic but look there he did actually say that!
Click to expand...




Hey look the emperor is wearing such beautiful clothes. Can't you see it? Can't you see? What great clothes the emperor is wearing. Har har har.
 
John99 said:
Geez why would you say such a thing?
Click to expand...
HAHAHAHA!!!!
That is a great example of how these trolls work to take statements out of context for their malicious intent of putting up false statements about me on the encyclopedia.

Look there is your quote that you can cite, and justify your lies about me:
lixluke said:
I stated that dangling babies off of the balcony was OK, fine, dandy, whatever, etc.
Click to expand...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top