Gravitational Fields and Gravitational Waves

Hmm no ,

G=F<E is a compete formula and explanation of gravitational transition .

An object in motion whilst traveling through space will remain in motion because of the vector attractive force of the future position spatial points F<E .

Any change of vector path requires an acting external force and/or a change of internal energy of the object .

Quite clearly you know no physics but measures of physics .

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

No, this is bullshit.

No, this is bullshit.

No, this is bullshit.

And you're still a liar.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

You are quite the bot with a limited capacity for words .

It is factual , not bs .

Energy transition does not involve propulsion , thrust or ''emittence'' force , therefore the only answer left is transition by attractive force .

You really should think before you keep embarrassing yourself with your limited thinking ability .

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

It's funny isn't it that the cranks, liars and nutcases prefer to simply reiterate their unsupported claims and make personal attacks rather than actually support those claims.

 

It is a shame you do that , I have seen no support that you do physics so far !

 

And you haven't supported a single one of your contentions.

 

Axioms don't need support because they are self evidently true !

 

Seems I made the right call when I put Mohat on ignore.

 

They're not axioms.
And they can't be self-evidently true because they're blatantly bullshit.

 

Theorist.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Keep telling yourself that Victor Meldrew because the physics doesn't care if you don't bloody believe it in denial .

Why don't you start by researching and looking up what a transition is ?

Quite clearly you have no real interest in physics and your only purpose is to act to your feelings

 

You don't know what physics does or doesn't do, liar.

Wrong again, liar.

 

All you ever say is blah blah blah , quite clearly you have been feeling down

I suspect you are quite young ?

 

Not only a liar but stupid with it.
My age is quite clearly given on my profile.

 

Ok if that is your age , you act like young with your mouth

 

I don't type with my mouth. Liar.

 

But you clearly are foul mouthed , remind a bit of that guy off TV who runs that pawn shop

 

But I don't lie about my occupation. So that's a plus.

 

I didn't lie about my occupation , I never stated my occupation . I said I was a professor of advanced science that doesn't mean I am employed by science .

Anyway no worries , my feelings have not been touched by you

 

Um, professor IS an occupation. (In the UK).

And that's a lie too.

The title professor is reserved for those who have been promoted to the highest grade on the university pay scale.

Like I asked before:
WHERE are you a professor?
Where did you get your qualifications?
What have you published?
Which institution made you a professor? (I actually know this one: you decided yourself that your title is "professor". Bit of a step up for a decorator, isn't it?)

Oh I wasn't worried at all, liar.