# Gravitational Fields and Gravitational Waves

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'll extend this because I am going offline this evening for a good while !

Contraction : (x1.y1.z1)-E=<(x1.y1.z1)

Expansion : (x1.y1.z1)+E=>(x1.y1.z1)

Gravity : F=0

An object is pulled to the ground because of the gravitational transition . The high energy state of the mass of the Earth is attracted to the lesser energy state of the mass of the object . The Earth can't move towards the falling object because of inertia .

The Earth's continuous motion around the Sun and gravitational displacement is because the higher energy of the earths mass is attracted to the lesser energy ahead of it F=<E

The Universe is expanding because the containment field singularity of q1+q2=1/t high energy state is attracted to the lesser energy state beyond the containment fields ''surface'' F=<E

All free matter within the quantum containment field singularity q1+q2=1/t is free to move because it is likewise in q1+q2=1/t

Mixing water with water is indistinguishable apart from the observation of a volume increase !

I'll extend this because I am going offline this evening for a good while !

......[snip].......

i.e. before you get banned again, you mean.

i.e. before you get banned again, you mean.
??????????

Actually because I can't afford to keep paying for an internet connection just to talk to plonkers via super mk ultra and special relativity .

I'm also sick of ''them'' probing my brain with their Tesla mind machine .

Much easier to stay off the net and give them no more free innovations !

??????????

Actually because I can't afford to keep paying for an internet connection just to talk to plonkers via super mk ultra and special relativity .

I'm also sick of ''them'' probing my brain with their Tesla mind machine .

Much easier to stay off the net and give them no more free innovations !

I am a professor of advanced physics thus including simultaneity . You wouldn't believe what you just said !

I am a professor of advanced physics thus including simultaneity .
No you're not.

No you're not.
Here we go with the charades , do you ever have anything productive to say ?

Here we go with the charades , do you ever have anything productive to say ?
Where are you a professor?
Where did you get your qualifications?
What have you published?

Where are you a professor?
Where did you get your qualifications?
What have you published?
1.I am a professor on Earth

2. The same place you got your four kings

3. TOE

1.I am a professor on Eart
So you're not a professor in the accepted sense of the word.
2. The same place you got your four king
I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. But I'll take it that you don't have the relevant qualifications.
That was published where?

Like I said: you're not a professor.

Last edited:
So you're not a professor in the accepted sense of the word.

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. But I'll take that you don't have the relevant qualifications.

You published on the end of your feet?

Like I said: you're not a professor.

You are?

I am an advanced physics professor and that is why I have the theory of everything which includes the mechanics of gravity .

The world was clueless until I explained the mechanism along with many other things .

It is ok that you do not wish to learn .

I am what?
I am an advanced physics professor
No. You are, however, deluded and a liar.
and that is why I have the theory of everything which includes the mechanics of gravity
You really don't.
The world was clueless until I explained the mechanism along with many other things
You haven't explained gravity. Or anything else.

I am what?

No. You are, however, deluded and a liar.

You really don't.

You haven't explained gravity. Or anything else.

Quite clearly you are one step away from the asylum !

G=F<E

What don't you understand about that ?

As you have been informed MANY times, that "equation" is pure bullshit.
What don't you understand about that ?
There's nothing to understand. A made up equation is worth nothing and means nothing.

Are you going to admit to being a liar or can you substantiate your claim to be a professor?

As you have been informed MANY times, that "equation" is pure bullshit.

There's nothing to understand. A made up equation is worth nothing and means nothing.

Are you going to admit to being a liar or can you substantiate your claim to be a professor?

.
a person who affirms a faith in or allegiance to something.

Confirmed

You don't know physics if you think G=F<E is bs !

I was right about you in the first place , you are a value ''inputter'' of existing equations which is not a mathematician .

If you do not understand gravitational transition , high energy traversing to lower energy states , you are clearly a fake in the thinking department !

How else do you think that energy travels from (a) to (b) ?

''Photons'' do not have an ''engine'' .

You don't know physics if you think G=F<E is bs !

I was right about you in the first place , you are a value ''inputter'' of existing equations which is not a mathematician .

If you do not understand gravitational transition , high energy traversing to lower energy states , you are clearly a fake in the thinking department !

How else do you think that energy travels from (a) to (b) ?
So you can't support your claim to a professor.

So you can't support your claim to a professor.

So you can't support your claim that you can think for yourself without relying on pre-programmed education ?

So you can't support your claim that you can think for yourself without relying on pre-programmed education ?
I see you're still deflecting and avoiding the question.
You've already admitted that you can't support your (made up) "equations" by actually doing the maths, so all you have is unsupported claims that they're valid. (And basic dimensional analysis - oh, and the rules of maths - shows that they're not).

Status
Not open for further replies.