So a 150 dead ain't a tragedy in your view, QQ? You sicken me.
I suppose you think that the next 150+ dead because of a possible cover up is any less sickening?So a 150 dead ain't a tragedy in your view, QQ? You sicken me.
but it is feasible given, especially given the spat of terrorist activity in recent times.
Especially the Charlie Hebdo attack on 7th Jan 2015
By whom was it reported as "trivial"? A member of the flight crew? The ground mechanics?It was reported as such yes...
It is also feasible that bigfoot(s) is/are real, and the reason we haven't found their remains yet is because before they die they communicate with a race of extraterrestrials who come and take them away for space-cremation...but it is feasible yes?
normally the crank shaft and engine block survive. Cast iron, hardened steel, and titanium are pretty indestructable if you have a look at other crash scenes for comparison if you wish to confirm.
In this case the FDBB survived then why not the hardened shafts?
You will notice the images of the VRBB show a VRBB badly damaged but apparently useable to BEA after hitting the ground at "several hundred MPH?... so go figure your logic...
Does it look pulverized to you?
See any burn marks, soot deposits, melting?
I don't. Maybe I need to change my glasses , wait... ok... nope same thing...
Contrary to the popular term "black box", the exterior of the FDR is coated with heat-resistant bright orangepaint for high visibility in wreckage, and the unit is usually mounted in the aircraft's empennage (tail section), where it is more likely to survive a severe crash.
FDRs are usually located in the rear of the aircraft, typically in the tail. In this position, the entire front of the aircraft is expected to act as a "crush zone" to reduce the shock that reaches the recorder. Also, modern FDRs are typically double wrapped in strong corrosion-resistant stainless steel or titanium, with high-temperature insulation inside. They are usually bright orange. An underwater locator beacon is mounted on a bracket bolted to the front of an FDR, this is designed to emit an ultrasonic "ping" for up to 30 days and can operate immersed to a depth of up to 6,000 meters (20,000 ft).[18][19]
Is that so? I dare say it is interesting how you know my mental state at this time - are you a spy?Oh please if you were as you say you would be arguing much more rationally.
Oh, do they now? So now you, oh great expert on all things computational, are saying that the virus has to be in the OS software itself? You are aware that it is incredibly trivial to write a startup script that is run as the OS loads and can be given priority to run before another application (such as, say, a users antivirus system). Or, if one wants to be really mean, they could create something that infects the BIOS/CMOS itself (or the UEFI that newer boards are using)... even worse are viruses that infect the firmware chips of hardware:Of course the OS is rebooted and of course the Virus (if any) is/was hiding in the files that support the OS.
However, creating stuff like this requires a lot of time, access, and a depth of understanding that surpasses a mere maintenance person.ONE OF THE most shocking parts of the recently discovered spying network Equation Group is its mysterious module designed to reprogram or reflash a computer hard drive’s firmware with malicious code. The Kaspersky researchers who uncovered this said its ability to subvert hard drive firmware—the guts of any computer—“surpasses anything else” they had ever seen.
The hacking tool, believed to be a product of the NSA, is significant because subverting the firmware gives the attackers God-like control of the system in a way that is stealthy and persistent even through software updates. The module, named “nls_933w.dll”, is the first of its kind found in the wild and is used with both the EquationDrug and GrayFish spy platforms Kaspersky uncovered.
The captain of this flight AA8501, didn't know whether the FAC had a virus or not.. He was simply doing what his Military training required him to do. Reboot the system and start again...why else would he disconnect the FAC... just for fun perhaps?
oh ..please.. don't forget the political influences and the huge amount of money involved in this... ( Consumer confidence in air flight is enormously important. )
Given that the investigation is never open to independent review and pubic scrutiny the fact that they are specialist works against them. You know .."the more you know, the more power you have, the more potentially corrupt you become"
*note also BEA and Airbus involvement in :
Air Canada flight 624 March 29th 2015 crash
There is no protection against this potential as far as I can see.
Your desire to bury the potential of Airbus equipment failure under the unproven suicide of a co-pilot is considerably more sickening.
hee hee I have my methods...Is that so? I dare say it is interesting how you know my mental state at this time - are you a spy?
So far
MH370 has gone inexplicably missing
Air Aisia had a proven FAC failure.
Germanwings flies at 700 kph into a mountain.
And now we have had a flight in Canada go down
and you wish to kick back and ignore the obvious...
hee hee .. why do you think you are more interested in attacking me instead of dealing with the topic of this thread? guess...
play the man and not the ball...? why?
No they wont...Ignore the obvious fear-mongers such as yourself? Yes, I'd love to be able to ignore them - unfortunately, some of us have to take a stand against what can only be described as paranoid delusions.
I am curious... what group, exactly, is responsible for these varied and differing incidents? Is it the Illuminati perhaps?
Careful, if you keep poking around in their business, they might make you disappear! lol
What logic?.. what facts?The ball has already been played - it was spiked into the ground at your feet by several arguments born of logic, fact, and rational thinking. You are the one standing there waving a shuttlecock racket around and swinging at imaginary insects.
No they wont...
and no it is not that simple...
but they might want you to disappear just like they might want a heap of passengers to...
What logic?.. what facts?
Call to authority is not much good.
Facts that aren't media hype ...very few.
At the moment no one knows jack shit.
and what do you have to say about the CVRBB they reckon they found with out resorting to authority and attacking me because the truth is staring you in the face.
compare these two recovered flight recorders:
well to digress back a few posts, the top red painted CVR was apparently recovered from a crash site that was littered with totally pulverized bits and pieces . In fact not even the engines nor the landing gear and tyres survived such pulverizing. Yet here was have a CVR BB that is still painted red made from plate steel and stainless steel still relatively intact... How is that?
The lower CVR is a black box recovered from an actual plane crash.. The above one well who knows...it coudl have come form any where, butr certainly not a hot pulverizing accident like purported.
see post #4611) What evidence do you have that the red CVR was made from plate/stainless steel and not the titanium container that is commonly used?
2) Again, we are talking about a device mounted at the rear of the plane - it is quite feasible that, upon impact, it sheared off and bounced out of the immediate crash zone, and thus was not in any actual fire.
3) Again, we are talking a device designed to survive virtually anything that could befall the aircraft... the rest of its components are not.
You say the lower CVR was recovered from an "actual plane crash"... are you now claiming the co-pilot didn't manage to get the plane into the dirt? If so... where is it, and where did the debris come from?