George Floyd trial,could you make a case for the defendant not being guilty of the charges?

Presented as part of the prosecution's closing arguments:

05OUWpc.jpg


Note that in second and third degree murder, ''the fact that other causes contributed to the death (of George Floyd) does not relieve the defendant of criminal liability." But, in order to convict under those charges, the entirety of the charge has to be met beyond a reasonable doubt - for all of the ''elements.''

Based on this, what would your verdict be?
 
Last edited:
So, your response is to change the subject entirely and go by way of blacks commit more crime rubbish?

I could say I expected better from you, but in reality, you just follow the same stupid pattern of all racists.

Here. Some light reading:

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0021934719895999

I didn't change the subject, you did. I've always pointed out that cops shoot more unarmed white people than black person but that of course there are more white people percentage wise but when you consider that 58 % of all violent crimes are committed by black people when it shows that race is not what is at stake here.

You didn't acknowledge that I said any of that and then went off on your rant. You are the racist here.
 
Based on this, what would your verdict be?
Manslaughter 2nd degree

Surprised Failure to provide Medical Assistance in a timely manner or some such charge

That could be ?proven? the first time Floyd said I can't breath OR even I have swallowed some drugs

:)
 
Last edited:
Why not? He had fentanyl, methamphetamine, THC and morphine in his system.

https://www.hennepin.us/-/media/hen...lic-safety/documents/floyd-autopsy-6-3-20.pdf

If you look at how the jury is to deliberate over the charges, they have to look at all the elements of each charge - for second and third degree murder, it doesn't really matter if other factors contributed to Floyd's death, Chauvin would still be criminally responsible. (providing all of the elements have been met beyond a reasonable doubt) That's how I'm understanding the chart I've posted above?
 
Manslaughter 2nd degree

Surprised Failure to provide Medical Assistance in a timely manner or some such charge

That could be ?proven? the first time Floyd said I can't breath OR even I have swollowed some drugs

:)
Yea, I can see manslaughter 2nd degree, although third degree murder could be possible. By ''intentional'' act, it doesn't mean that Chauvin intended to kill Floyd; he intentionally acted in a way that was considered dangerous (and should have known better kind of thing, that death might be possible given the level of force). The prosecution had mentioned in closing ''if someone knows better, then they should do better.'' But, one could also say that Chauvin was following what he thought in that moment, were acceptable procedures, and he wouldn't have dreamed that Floyd would have died. There's reasonable doubt there, I guess.

Equally possible, is a hung jury. Just one or two jurors might hold out...if this drags on all week, that will likely be the outcome.
 
providing all of the elements have been met beyond a reasonable doubt

I feel
  • murder in second and
  • murder in third
  • BOTH
  • fail at the
  • second element
  • SUBSTANTIAL
fentanyl, methamphetamine, THC and morphine in his system.

for me rule out SUBSTANTIAL

Again call for Medical Assistance at first mention of
the first time Floyd said I can't breath OR even I have swallowed some drugs

all charges go away

:)
 
So that whole argument hinges upon you uncritically accepting bureaucratic whitewashing? Really?
Government bean counting is not the same as what actual Americans think. Why, does everything your government does reflect the thinking of a majority of Aussies?
You really cannot accept that a person with Syrian ancestry would be considered "white" legally in the US? And isn't it interesting how you believe the law should be ignored if it goes against your own racial prejudice.

That's kind of telling, don't you think?

Legally, Syrian Americans are considered white in the US. I get it.. Red blooded Americans like you can't understand how a Muslim would be considered "white", given your previous response:

Correction, Ahmad Al Aliwi Al-Issa was a Syrian Muslim, not white.

But he is actually white.
Anyway, that guy surrendered after being shot in the leg. See, the "white" guy was shot.
Tell me... Would he have been shot in the leg if he had been black? If a black man shot so many people, would it have been a simple leg shot in the end?
No idea why you keep saying "not shot or tased". Neither was Floyd, so it's anyone's guess how you imagine these cases are relevant. Where's the drugged up white guy with positional asphyxia?

Oh right, I already posted two of them ages ago: http://sciforums.com/threads/george...lty-of-the-charges.164217/page-7#post-3671646
No criminal charges filed against the officers in two strikingly similar situations to Floyd's, including cause of death findings, but the victims were both white. That blows your sorry cherry-picking out of the water.
Deliberately obtuse. How totally unexpected..

Why weren't they charged? They killed him and Farah.

Which is probably why the same civil rights lawyer involved in Floyd's case, is going after the police in Florida. It defies logic that police in the US can keep getting away with killing people in this way.

And it still does not take away from the over-policing and higher rate of killing of black males by police in the US. You have police departments and officers who are getting away with absolutely crap and killings and add another layer of racial bias to the mix. It's why black males are twice as likely as white males to be killed by police. It's not acceptable, whether you are white or black or of any ethnic background. It is absolutely unacceptable and I cannot for the life of me understand how you or anyone can defend it.

See the aforementioned post for two direct comparisons to Floyd's: http://sciforums.com/threads/george...lty-of-the-charges.164217/page-7#post-3671646
The white guys don't get charges pressed against the officers.
Why not? Why weren't they charged? Do you think it's acceptable that they weren't charged?

Speaking of the cctv footage seen by the dispatcher, you didn't notice how Chauvin was pushed back suddenly and had to lean forward with his body weight to try to keep Floyd in the car? If not, just more of the many things you seem to completely miss.
And then he used his hands and dragged him out of the car. No one has been able to explain why he did that. Given he refused to testify, we'll never know. Maybe he's waiting for a book deal.

What part of "the officers likely didn't know where the ambulance was" don't you understand?
And which part of the 'the officers did not tell them that the patient had already left' didn't you understand in any of it?

Please learn to read. I didn't excuse anything. In fact, I actually said "that cop wrongly detained the filming man". Hint, that's the opposite of excusing it.
I also told you that the motorcyclist wasn't in custody, so it doesn't refute what I said earlier (hence bullshit), about police not leaving an arrested person unsecured. Try to pay attention.
And again, he warranted the motorcyclist to be enough of a threat that he pulled his weapon out. Despite the guy sitting on his bike in a drive way with his hands up in the air.. But then he realises he's being filmed and the guy with the phone on his front porch is suddenly the bigger threat that he leaves the guy he deemed dangerous enough to draw his weapon on was left forgotten as he launched his verbal and then physical attack on a guy sitting on his own front porch filming the officer who had entered his front yard with his gun drawn?

I can't help it if you don't understand how muscles and body weight work. The cctv footage seen by the dispatcher you cited clearly shows Chauvin struggle to keep Floyd in the car. I can't help it if you're blind and you were duped by the prosecution conflating when the officers decided to quit trying to fight to get Floyd in the car, and laid him down like he asked them to. Remember, guy whining about claustrophobia?
Oh, so now you're going to argue that they were helping him with his claustrophobia by dragging him out of the car and kneeling on his neck until he died.

Could you be more ridiculous?

I have some idea how clueless you are about the realities of policing.
Crowds have been increasingly attacking police since 2016.
I guess you can be.

There were less than a dozen people. All were either filming, begging them to get off his neck and/or calling 911.

The fire department who responded to the scene described them as upset but not unruly. Video footage of the scene shows they were not unruly. Any more excuses you planning on making?
You obviously have no idea how muscles, body weight, or even simple reasoning works. You don't try to yank someone out of car to immediately try to shove them back in.
Read what I said and then try that again.
 
So, if a black person doesn't think like most other black people, they're racist (self-loathing blacks)?
No. Candace Owens is just racist. Full stop.

Anybody, regardless of ethnicity, sex, sexuality, religion, who comes out and opines that the problem with Hitler was that he wanted to globalise, should never, ever, be linked to as an example. But here you are. Linking Candace Owens and using her as an example. Because she's the far right's go to girl to prove you aren't racist..

If so, are you telling me blacks are less capable of independent thought than whites? I don't believe it, but if that's your lived experience, who am I to argue.
She's a con artist and a bigot.

I don't give a shit what her ethnicity or colour is.

You do know that the original Uncle Tom martyred himself to save others from slavery, right?
Yep. And then pro-slavery white men decided to turn him into something else and it is that version that became the dominant story.

And you need to pay attention to more than clickbait. Blacks were better under Jim Crow, but only in specific ways, like more intact families and less children outside of marriage. You know, protective factors against a life a crime. It is a sad fact that I can understand you wanting to avoid.

George White was critically injured. But when surgeons in his Atlanta hospital found out he had black ancestry, they kicked him out mid-examination, shipping him across the street to a black hospital despite the pouring rain. He died in the overcrowded, underfunded hospital days later. The year was 1931, and like hundreds of thousands of other black people in the segregated South, White was a victim of Jim Crow segregation laws.

Between the 1870s and the 1960s, Jim Crow laws upheld a vicious racial hierarchy in southern states, circumventing protections that had been put in place after the end of the Civil War—such as the 15th Amendment, which gave black men the right to vote 150 years ago this week. The discriminatory laws denied black people their rights, subjected them to public humiliation, and perpetuated their economic and educational marginalization. Anyone who challenged the social order faced mockery, harassment, and murder
.​

Jim Crow era.. Keeping black families together..

Too bad about Mr White's family or the families of the thousands of black men and women who were lynched or murdered

I don't have to deny racism in myself when I can just keep pointing to yours. No, I have zero black friends. I don't have much in common with blacks, but then I don't have much in common with most whites either.
Says a lot about you.

So far, all your little quibbles about her have been vacuous. Just a pissy little leftist regurgitating the usual leftist crap.
Uh huh..

Hey! She could be your black friend. You have a lot in common!

Wow, you're so twisted up about Owens that you didn't realize that had nothing to do with her.
Again, learn the difference between the medical finding of homicide and the criminal charge.
Your play is obvious. It was the 'see, black person also thinks so and so'.. And you picked Candace Owens.

There's a history of you making up pure bullshit to justify your own racist tendency.
And again, learn how to read simple English. I already corrected your failing comprehension once.
Ah, projecting again.

You do this all the time.

That picture was the cherry-picking. You did not limit those two flags accompanying each other only by white supremacists. Now, maybe that was your intent, but you failed to communicate it. Yes, everyone can go look for themselves.

So are you now tell me that you agree that not all Confederate flag wavers are racist? That's what it would take for your post to not be a hasty generalization. So take your pick.
Cherry picked? There are hundreds of such images. I picked the smallest ones I could fit without taking up the entire page.

And my comment was clear. You're the one twisting yourself into a pretzel to make it into something else entirely.

You also do this all the time.

How does that have anything to do with white posters? It didn't say, "can white people make the case for his innocence". And I gave you an example of a black person who does, and your only comeback was the "no true Scotsman" fallacy. It just somehow doesn't count, just because you say so. That's bullshit, and any adult should be able to recognize that.

You're a racist if you insist that a person's skin color alone makes them bad people or their opinion automatically invalid. Period.
My comment was clear enough and explained why it was inappropriate.

Your example was of a black Hitler sympathiser with a known history of fraudulent behaviour and racist ideology for political expediency..

I'm not the one arguing that skin colour makes someone bad. But you're such a dishonest hack, that you think this play is effective.
 
Again call for Medical Assistance at first mention of I can’t breathe or even I have swallowed some drugs.

I didn’t hear him say that he swallowed drugs. Did he say that?

What I heard was that he had claustrophobia and that he felt choked and couldn’t breathe when he was put into the car.

Claustrophobia can make you feel like you’re going to die. It can also make you feel like you’re choking, cause your heart to race and cause shortness of breath, but it won’t kill you. However, the drugs in his system could have kill him.
 
Doesn't matter. If Chauvin _contributed_ to his death (not caused it; see the chart above) he can be found culpable for murder.

If he died of a drug overdose, the contributor would more than likely be one of the passengers in his vehicle that provided him with the drugs.
 
If he died of a drug overdose, the contributor would more than likely be one of the passengers in his vehicle that provided him with the drugs.
Yep. But he didn't die of a drug overdose, per the coroner. His death was a homicide caused by "cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression." A second coroner agreed, saying his death was caused by "asphyxiation from sustained pressure."

Hence the trial.
 
I didn’t hear him say that he swallowed drugs. Did he say that?
The discovery of the pill fragments heightened the importance of a garbled audio clip of Floyd taken during the arrest by a police body-worn camera. The two sides offered opposing interpretations of the audio. The prosecution said Floyd said “I ain’t do no drugs,” in the clip. The defense claims that Floyd actually said, “I ate too many drugs.” One witness for the prosecution, James Reyerson, the agent in charge of an investigation into George Floyd’s arrest, said he heard both versions after hearing two different renditions. When presented with a longer version of the audio, that included police conversation about drugs, Reyerson ultimately said he believed Floyd to be stating he hadn’t used drugs.

https://slate-com.cdn.ampproject.or...oyd-swallowed-drugs-as-police-approached.html

:)
 
The first officers on the scene handcuffed the victim and put him in a vehicle.
The defendant arrived pulled the handcuffed victim from the vehicle and tossed him on the ground placing his knee on his neck.
The defendant is responsible for the victim's death because of his actions because the death was caused by those actions not whatever chemicals were in the victim's body. Even if the drugs hastened the victim's death I suggest he would still be alive if he had remained seated in the vehicle until paramedics arrived.
 
The first officers on the scene handcuffed the victim and put him in a vehicle.
The defendant arrived pulled the handcuffed victim from the vehicle and tossed him on the ground placing his knee on his neck.
The defendant is responsible for the victim's death because of his actions because the death was caused by those actions not whatever chemicals were in the victim's body. Even if the drugs hastened the victim's death I suggest he would still be alive if he had remained seated in the vehicle until paramedics arrived.

I’m not so sure about that.

Nelson asked Tobin if he'd heard of "wooden chest syndrome," a rigidity of the chest wall found in people who take fentanyl. Tobin conceded that the condition can "impede the ability of lungs to expand."

Nelson also noted that in his report, Tobin said he would expect the peak of respiratory suppression from fentanyl to come on fairly quickly — about five minutes after taking a pill.

Nelson used this to ask about the partial tablets with Floyd's saliva on them that were found in the back of the police cruiser. If, hypothetically, Floyd had those pills in his mouth as he struggled in the back of the squad car at 8:18 p.m., Nelson asked, would Tobin would expect the fentanyl Floyd ingested to affect his breathing five minutes later, when he was on the ground?

Tobin said yes, but that it would depend on "how much of it was ingested."

The officer in the 2019 video suspected that he shoved drugs in his mouth then.

>Open your mouth. Spit out what you’ve got.


The muscle rigidity seen in his hands could be an indication of wooden chest syndrome. There are several cases where patients presented with their fists clinched, dyskinesia and distress. They were alert and responsive, even yelling, but none of them were exhibiting other typical features of opioid overdose. It can also cause laryngospasm making you feel like you’re choking and can’t breathe. Toss in methamphetamine with a stressful event and voila.
 
Last edited:
I’m not so sure about that.

Nelson asked Tobin if he'd heard of "wooden chest syndrome," a rigidity of the chest wall found in people who take fentanyl. Tobin conceded that the condition can "impede the ability of lungs to expand."
Sure. He might have had that. He might have had a stroke in another ten minutes. He might have had a heart attack in an hour. Heck, a meteor might have hit him the next day and killed him anyway; you have to admit it's possible.

But none of that matters. What DOES matter is that Chauvin kept his knee on his neck and back until he was unconscious, then he kept it there until he stopped breathing, then kept it there until his heart stopped, too. Something else may have killed him later.

But that doesn't really matter. Chauvin kneeled on him at 8:20pm on May 25, 2020. He stopped moving within a minute. He began pleading for his life, and did so multiple times over the next three minutes, saying "I can't breathe" several times. Chauvin kept his knee on his neck. By 8:25 Chauvin was unconscious. Chauvin kept his knee on Floyd's neck. At 8:27 paramedics arrived. They could not find a pulse; Floyd's heart had stopped. Chauvin kept his knee on Floyd's neck even after his heart had stopped. He only removed it, almost eight minutes after he started kneeling on Floyd, when paramedics had to move the body to a stretcher.

There is no doubt that Floyd performed an action that could reasonably be expected to harm someone, that it was not a method he was trained to use, and that he did so long after Floyd was no longer a threat (i.e. not only was he unconscious, his heart had stopped.) And there is no doubt that Floyd was alive before Chauvin's act and was dead afterwards, and both the coroner and an independent pathologist agree that Chauvin's actions led to Floyd's death. The only real remaining question are the details of his intent - those determine which of those crimes his actions fall under.
 
Breaking news everyone - verdict has been reached. It will be announced later this afternoon. Only ten hours of deliberation.

Potentially guilty? Usually, guilty verdicts are arrived at quicker than acquittals, but who knows.
 
Back
Top