No she didn't. She never said that. You're lying just like you always do. Don't waste my time anymore..
Yes, she sSpeaking of dishonest behaviour, still waiting for you to address this:
Then of course comes the one in the OP who claims that bigfoot is a spirit that visits from the spiritual realm, which directly contradicts Ketchum's study.
So which one is correct, MR?
Is bigfoot a spirit from the spiritual realm as per your OP? Or is bigfoot a real life human being, as per Ketchum's study?
Because you are contradicting yourself in this thread. Your OP and the bigfoot claim in the OP of this thread is a direct contradiction to Ketchum's study. Your OP and the article you linked clearly states that there can be no evidence of bigfoot because it is a spirit, yet here you are pushing that Ketchum's study is correct. Why are you contradicting yourself?
I don't respond to points based on fabrications and lies. Bells says Fred Beck's experience never happened and left no evidence because he later believed they came from another plane. That's false. He told the story himself of how it happened and included other witnesses and left footprints and damage to the cabin. It was a real physical encounter, just like the 6 or 7 other accounts I posted. That's why I'm not responding to that. Got it?
See, the only way you can try and get away with that is if you think we are stupid or if you think we did not read the link you provided in the OP.
Beck's comments, which you so firmly supported and fought for for several pages, declared that bigfoot is not a real being that leaves evidence, but is a spiritual being that is unable to leave any physical evidence like blood, skin, fur or even the dead body which they had allegedly shot, because he declared they are spirits and everything connected to them retreat to the spiritual realm. Yet here you are, after declaring Beck was correct, now saying that Ketchum had DNA evidence, which directly and absolutely contradicts Beck's accounts and experiences, which you previously said was correct.
Which begs the question.. Why are you contradicting your own arguments and why are you providing contradictory stories and refusing to account for the blatant contradiction?
Are they real and physical beings as Ketchum claims? Or are they spirits like Beck claims?
If you believe in one, then it will automatically disprove the other, which raises a lot of questions. Claim I am lying as much as you want, but the words of both are available for everyone to read for themselves. So, MR, which do you believe?
Here is what Beck said:
The The Abominable Snowmen are from a lower plane.When the condition and vibration is at a certain frequency, they can easily, for a time, appear in a very solid body. They are not animal spirits, but also lack the intelligence of a human consciousness When reading of evolution we have read many times conjecture about the missing link between man and the Anthropoid Ape. The Snowmen are a missing link in consciousness, neither animal nor human. They are very close to out dimension, and yet are a part of one lower. Could they be the missing link man has been so long searching for?
[...]
Most theories picture the Snowmen as material beings hiding in caves, and scampering over the mountains. The law of probability would be that eventually one would be found if their bodies were of physical construction only. If one claims only the physical laws to explain their existence, then we can use a material logic to prove or disprove the premise. If they are material life definite material evidence would surely be found.
What material evidence we do have, in my opinion which I believe firmly to be true, only shows material extrances into this plane, followed by the supernatural exits back into their own realm.
I and my companions have shot them, but could find no trace of them. If they were material life like we know it to be on this globe, one would die naturally or accidentally and the remains be found.
That is from the link you provided for in your OP and the very person you said saw and experienced bigfoot. Yet his claims and his experiences directly contradict Ketchum. Because according to Beck, it is impossible for beings from the spiritual realm to leave physical evidence, like materials from their bodies, for example (which Ketchum claims she used to test their DNA). According to Beck, they leave no trace. So what, exactly, did Ketchum test if they leave no trace because they are spirits? You cannot believe in both here. Which one is correct? And why are you using contradictory arguments which cancel each other out?
Then you insinuate that giant squids can be compared to your impossible creature, when giant squids are caught/washed up numerous times around the world.
