I am afraid that nebel is impervious to reason.
Doing the Numbers on No. 1
- Thread starter nebel
- Start date
instead of discussing (glad there is no cussing) the messenger, tackle the message. it is tens all the way down,young man.
Last edited:
No doubt the moles consider their hills more important than the mountains.
It is an old strategy, if the message is inconvenient, perceived as defective, decapitate the messenger. Or at least try to depict her/him as deficient. empty headed. Inviting a hydra response.
I am not implying a significance to the numbers as conspiracy theorists might construct, but they are there. and herewith staying power.
Last edited:
indeed, moles live in tunnels, they never see the mountains., normally even their own piles against the blue sky. Sherpas and moles are about as far apart as you can get in look back time, horizon.
Last edited:
The punchline is that you're the mole.
THERE IS NO MESSAGE
If there IS a message you have not said (delivered) it
All you have are vague happenstances
You can get those in any newspaper generllge under a heading something like Your Stars for the Day
You appear to be looking up Uranus to find something mystic
It's a planet not a crystal ball and both are as relevant to each other as your supposed groupings of 10
Check your posts, you posted it. Tunnel vision at it's best. your arguments are already buried.
I am with the 1o, the No.1, you are the mole sitting in your hole.
The 10s are not going away, mole piles? hollow.
Last edited:
that is all that counts.
Your trying to equate science data with astrology is showing how desperate you are to undo or discredit the 10s. .
Last edited:
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
You are putting the fault on the wrong party here.
- You have presented your case.
- We have shown that the argument is logically flawed: because you are
a. cherry-picking data to suit your idea, and
b. warping that data to make it fit, by using arbitrary units, and employing arbitrary margins of error, and assigning arbitrary significance to the result. - You have presented no further argument, and you are simply repeatedly insisting your original argument has merit. That too is a logical flaw (argument by repetition.)
The last relevant point that was on-topic was our dismantling of your idea. The discussion has no where else to go. What you are doing is simply hoping to lay down the last word, as if that will keep the discussion going. And that's why people are now targeting you, because you have become the source of the problem).
That's not how science is done. One critical component of the scientific method is knowing when an idea is not bearing fruit, and it's time to let go.
Last edited:
a) Of course the compilation contains only data that are relevant. Why would I pick apples when I am looking for cherries?
b) units that are universally recognized, Light Seconds. AU, km/s, "c". Bode, Of course, applying a certain system will have a pattern clearly emerge. try to doing math in Roman notation. The finest science has been done by employing specialized relevant notations.
That was no refutation of arguments at all, perhaps really vindicating them instead.
Of course I rested my case, The numbers stand. but am glad to match wits against determined nay sayers.
Of which you have none
The last thing anyone here wants is for you to try and match anything else
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Nebel, you clearly understand the error, and you also clearly believe that, as long as you keep talking, you think you're getting positive attention - as witnessed by your post count (where you make giant threads of only you talking). You will then take this back to your Facebook page and claim "Look how much interest I'm generating! Hundreds of posts and views!" Just as you have done here, by claiming people are following you on Facebook.
This is a purely self-serving exercise for you. For this reason, your credibility has dropped to the level of troll (a troll seeks any attention, even negative attention).
And thus you go on the ignore list.
Pity. You're not a bad guy, but your motives are destructive.
This is a purely self-serving exercise for you. For this reason, your credibility has dropped to the level of troll (a troll seeks any attention, even negative attention).
And thus you go on the ignore list.
Pity. You're not a bad guy, but your motives are destructive.
Any significant meaning to 3 in a row?
[Click]
[Click]
and I thought the nasa/ astronomy charts charts that I was drawing from were science based.
Any significant meaning to 3 in a row?
[Click]
It depends. if it is 3 mole piles in a row, it means there is likely a tunnel connecting them. If there is three positions corresponding to a sequence linked to "c" value it is worth keeping it in memory. If there are 9 in a row, in multiples, and one of them just happens to be very close to your favoured counting aid, there might be a future surprise in store for you.
That is a measure of last resort. When everything else failed. happened to a hero of mine, J. Kepler.
Universally recognized? Really?
And yes, you can join the others on my ignore list.
well, they are in the metric system. Mp/h, feet/sec, stones, pounds, ounces are recognized too, in some places.
When we get more and finer exoplanet data, we will see whether these ratios , round numbers (in any system) will jump up to our attention, out of the nebel of data.
Imagine the scenario (unlikely) we discovered that using "c" we come to round numbers in an exoplanet system. would be be amiss making connections to the ones we see here in No. 1?
unlikely because nature turns out to fashion often the most divergent from identical laws, structures.
Last edited:
Just about everybody on this thread has pointed out your tunnel vision.